Analysis of Corporal Turnbull's decision to avoid punishing Private Quelch
Corporal Turnbull's decision to avoid punishing Private Quelch can be analyzed from various perspectives:

Understanding Private Quelch's behavior
- Private Quelch's behavior of constantly correcting his fellow soldiers and showing off his knowledge may have been annoying to others, but it was not harmful or disruptive to the military operation.
- Punishing Private Quelch for his behavior may not have been necessary as it did not violate any military rules or regulations.

Considering the impact of hash punishment
- Hash punishment can have negative consequences on morale and discipline within the unit.
- Using hash punishment for minor infractions can create a hostile environment and lead to resentment among the soldiers.

Promoting a positive work environment
- Corporal Turnbull may have chosen to avoid punishing Private Quelch in order to maintain a positive work environment within the unit.
- By addressing Private Quelch's behavior through other means, such as counseling or mentoring, Corporal Turnbull could guide him towards more appropriate conduct without resorting to hash punishment.

Encouraging professional development
- Instead of punishing Private Quelch, Corporal Turnbull could have utilized his knowledge and skills in a more productive manner.
- By channeling Private Quelch's expertise towards tasks that benefit the unit, Corporal Turnbull could foster professional development and improve overall performance.
In conclusion, Corporal Turnbull's decision to avoid punishing Private Quelch may have been justified in the context of maintaining morale, promoting a positive work environment, and encouraging professional development within the unit.