Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago?
Observe the given options and mark the correct one.
a)
The Constitution reflects the views of its members alone
b)
It expresses the broad consensus of its time
c)
The Constituent Assembly represented only the selected groups and communities
d)
There is no concrete sanctity to the Constitution by the Constituent Assembly
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago?
Observe the given options and mark the correct one.

a)
The Constitution reflects the views of its members alone
b)
It expresses the broad consensus of its time
c)
The Constituent Assembly represented only the selected groups and communities
d)
There is no concrete sanctity to the Constitution by the Constituent Assembly

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Answer

Correct option is B , because the constitution expresses a broad consensus of it's time,it tells about the people and their thoughts of the country at that time, the development and advancement of country,the society and its demerits ,the economic condition .And the most important thing the need of the country. Hope it will help you!!!!

Answer

Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago?

The correct answer is option 'B' - It expresses the broad consensus of its time.

Explanation:

The Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago should be accepted because it expresses the broad consensus of its time. Here are the reasons why:

1. Reflects the views of its members alone:
The Constitution is not a mere reflection of the views of the members of the Constituent Assembly alone. It is a document that was created after much deliberation and debate, taking into consideration the opinions and perspectives of various stakeholders. The members of the Constituent Assembly represented diverse groups and communities, and their views were taken into account during the drafting process.

2. Represents the broad consensus of its time:
The Constitution was framed at a time when India was going through a significant transition from colonial rule to an independent nation. The Constituent Assembly comprised representatives from different political parties, regions, and communities. Despite their differences, they were able to arrive at a consensus on various key issues and principles that form the foundation of the Constitution. This broad consensus ensures that the Constitution is a balanced and inclusive document, reflecting the aspirations and values of the diverse Indian society.

3. Represents selected groups and communities:
While it is true that the Constituent Assembly represented selected groups and communities, it is important to note that the members were chosen through a democratic process. The Assembly included representatives from different regions, religions, castes, and genders, ensuring a fair representation of the Indian society at that time. The inclusion of diverse perspectives helped in creating a Constitution that takes into account the interests and concerns of various sections of society.

4. Concrete sanctity to the Constitution:
The Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly holds a concrete sanctity. It is the supreme law of the land and provides a framework for governance, ensuring the protection of fundamental rights and principles of justice, equality, and liberty. The Constitution has stood the test of time and has been amended as per the changing needs of the society. Its sanctity lies in its ability to adapt and evolve, while still upholding the core values and principles enshrined in it.

In conclusion, the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago should be accepted because it expresses the broad consensus of its time. It is a document that reflects the collective wisdom and aspirations of the diverse Indian society, ensuring a fair and inclusive governance framework for the nation.

Answer

Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago?

Introduction:
The Constitution of a country is a fundamental document that outlines the principles, values, and structure of governance. It is essential to analyze the reasons for accepting the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago.

Expresses the broad consensus of its time:
One of the primary reasons for accepting the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly is that it expresses the broad consensus of its time. The Constituent Assembly consisted of representatives from various political parties, communities, and regions, ensuring a diverse and inclusive representation. The discussions and debates held during its formation allowed for the incorporation of different perspectives and ensured that the Constitution reflected the aspirations and concerns of the entire nation. The Constitution, therefore, stands as a product of collective wisdom and consensus, making it a crucial document for accepting.

Reflects the views of its members alone:
Contrary to option 'a', the Constitution does not solely reflect the views of its members alone. The Constituent Assembly was not a group of individuals with homogeneous opinions but rather a platform for diverse voices. It comprised representatives from different walks of life, including politicians, lawyers, activists, and thinkers, who brought their unique perspectives and insights to the table. The Constitution, therefore, is a result of extensive deliberations that took into account multiple viewpoints.

Represented selected groups and communities:
Option 'c' states that the Constituent Assembly represented only selected groups and communities, which is incorrect. The Constituent Assembly sought to ensure fair representation of various communities, castes, religions, and regions. Members of the Assembly were elected based on the principles of proportional representation, ensuring that all sections of society had a voice in shaping the Constitution. This inclusivity and representation make the Constitution more acceptable and credible.

Concrete sanctity to the Constitution:
Option 'd' suggests that there is no concrete sanctity to the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly. On the contrary, the Constitution holds immense sanctity as it serves as the supreme law of the land. It provides a framework for governance, upholds the rights and freedoms of citizens, and establishes the separation of powers. The Constitution has withstood the test of time and has been a guiding force in maintaining the democratic fabric of the nation. Its sanctity lies in its ability to adapt and evolve with the changing needs of society while upholding the fundamental principles enshrined in it.

Conclusion:
Accepting the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago is crucial due to its ability to express the broad consensus of its time, reflect diverse viewpoints, ensure representation of various communities, and provide a concrete sanctity to the governance of the nation. The Constitution stands as the bedrock of our democracy and continues to guide the nation towards progress and inclusive growth.

Answer

Introduction:
The Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago should be accepted because it expresses the broad consensus of its time. This means that it reflects the collective will and aspirations of the people who were involved in the process of drafting the Constitution.

Explanation:
1. Broad Consensus:
The correct answer is option B because the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly was not the product of individual opinions but rather a result of extensive debates, discussions, and negotiations among the members representing various sections of society. The Constituent Assembly consisted of representatives from diverse backgrounds, including different political parties, communities, and regions. The Constitution they drafted was a culmination of their efforts to find common ground and create a framework that would be acceptable to a wide range of stakeholders.

2. Reflecting the Views of its Members:
Option A is incorrect because the Constitution does not solely reflect the views of its members alone. While the members of the Constituent Assembly played a crucial role in shaping the Constitution, their individual opinions were not the sole basis for its provisions. The Constitution was a result of deliberation and compromise, taking into account the diverse perspectives and interests of the Assembly members.

3. Representation of Selected Groups and Communities:
Option C is incorrect because the Constituent Assembly represented not only selected groups and communities but also a wide range of stakeholders. The members of the Assembly were chosen through a democratic process, and they represented different political parties, regions, religions, and social groups. The Assembly aimed to ensure fair representation and inclusivity, which is reflected in the Constitution they drafted.

4. Sanctity of the Constitution:
Option D is incorrect because the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly holds concrete sanctity. It is the supreme law of the land and provides the framework for governance, fundamental rights, and principles of democracy. The Constitution has withstood the test of time and has been amended to address the changing needs of society. It has provided stability and continuity to the country's political system and has been upheld by the judiciary.

Conclusion:
The Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago should be accepted because it expresses the broad consensus of its time. It reflects the collective will and aspirations of the people who were involved in its drafting and represents a framework that has stood the test of time. The Constitution provides a stable and inclusive foundation for governance and upholds the principles of democracy and fundamental rights.

Answer

Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago?

The Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago should be accepted because it expresses the broad consensus of its time. This means that it reflects the collective agreement and understanding of the diverse groups and communities that were represented in the assembly. Let's discuss this in more detail:

1. Broad Consensus:
The Constitution was drafted by a diverse group of representatives who were elected from various regions and communities across the country. These representatives were chosen to ensure fair representation of different interests and opinions. Therefore, the Constitution can be seen as a result of a deliberative process that aimed to find common ground among these representatives. It reflects the broad consensus reached by the assembly members on various important issues.

2. Reflects the Views of the Time:
The Constitution was drafted during a critical period in the history of India when the country had just gained independence from colonial rule. The Constituent Assembly members were acutely aware of the challenges and aspirations of the newly independent nation. They had firsthand experience of the struggles and sacrifices made during the freedom movement. As a result, the Constitution was formulated to address the specific needs and goals of the time, taking into consideration the prevailing political, social, and economic conditions.

3. Inclusive Representation:
The Constituent Assembly consisted of representatives from diverse backgrounds, including different religions, castes, languages, and regions. The assembly members included leaders from different political parties, social reformers, intellectuals, and experts in various fields. The inclusion of such a wide range of perspectives ensured that the Constitution was not biased towards any particular group or community. It aimed to protect the rights and interests of all individuals and communities, promoting equality and social justice.

4. Sanctity of the Constitution:
The Constitution is considered the supreme law of the land and provides the framework for governance in India. It has been the guiding document for the functioning of the country's democratic institutions. The Constitution has stood the test of time and has been amended to address the changing needs and demands of society. Its sanctity lies in the fact that it has provided stability, continuity, and a sense of security to the people of India for more than five decades.

Conclusion:
The Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than fifty years ago should be accepted because it represents the broad consensus of its time. It reflects the collective wisdom and aspirations of the diverse groups and communities that were represented in the assembly. The Constitution has played a crucial role in shaping India's democratic system and has provided a strong foundation for the country's progress and development. Therefore, it is important to recognize and respect the Constitution as a living document that continues to guide and govern the nation.

Similar Class 9 Doubts

Why should we accept the Constitution made by the Constituent Assembly more than six decades ago?

Why should we accept a constitution made by constituent assembly long ago?

Assess the contribution made by Constituent Assembly to form the Indian constitution ?

asses the contribution made by the constituent assembly to form the Indian constitution

Top Courses for Class 9View all

Science Class 9

Social Studies (SST) Class 9

Mathematics (Maths) Class 9

English Class 9

English Grammar Advanced

Top Courses for Class 9

Top Courses for Class 9

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

Class 9 Study Material

Class 9 Subjects

Competitive Examinations for Class 9

NCERT Books

NCERT Solutions

Reference Books for Class 9

Other Popular Exams

Company