Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >  If n>2 then the number of surjection that can... Start Learning for Free
If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is?
Most Upvoted Answer
If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,....
Number of Surjections from (1,2,3,...,n) onto (1,2)

To find the number of surjections from the set (1,2,3,...,n) onto the set (1,2), we can use the principle of inclusion-exclusion.

Principle of Inclusion-Exclusion:

The principle of inclusion-exclusion is a counting technique used to calculate the number of elements in the union of multiple sets, taking into account the overlap between the sets.

Step 1: Total Number of Functions

The total number of functions that can be defined from the set (1,2,3,...,n) onto the set (1,2) is given by:

2^n

This is because for each element in the set (1,2,3,...,n), there are 2 choices to map it to in the set (1,2) - either 1 or 2. Since there are n elements in the set (1,2,3,...,n), the total number of functions is 2^n.

Step 2: Excluding Functions with Empty Images

To find the number of surjections, we need to exclude the functions that have empty images. In other words, we need to exclude the functions that do not map any element to the set (1,2).

The number of functions with empty images is 2^(n-2). This is because for each element in the set (1,2,3,...,n), there are 2 choices to map it to in the set (1,2), except for the last two elements. For the last two elements, there is only one choice - they must be mapped to the set (1,2) to ensure a surjection.

Therefore, the number of functions with empty images is 2^(n-2).

Step 3: Including Functions with One Empty Image

Next, we need to consider the functions that have exactly one empty image. This means that one element from the set (1,2,3,...,n) is not mapped to the set (1,2).

The number of functions with one empty image can be calculated using the principle of inclusion-exclusion. The number of functions with one empty image is given by:

C(n,1) * 2^(n-3)

Here, C(n,1) represents the number of ways to choose one element from the set (1,2,3,...,n), and 2^(n-3) represents the number of ways to assign the remaining elements to the set (1,2), excluding the last two elements.

Step 4: Calculating the Number of Surjections

Finally, we can find the number of surjections by subtracting the number of functions with empty images and the number of functions with one empty image from the total number of functions.

Number of surjections = 2^n - 2^(n-2) - C(n,1) * 2^(n-3)

Simplifying this expression gives us the final answer for the number of surjections from the set (1,2,3,...,n) onto the set (1,2).
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

India really cannot handle tension in West Asia right now.That may seem obvious: after all, any escalation in hostilities between Iran and the United States, after the latter killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, will have a huge impact across the region and beyond. Its not for nothing that "World War 3" trended on Twitter on Friday.There are two primary dangers for India, other than the extremely destabilising effects of any outright war in the region.One, there are 8 million Indians living and working in West Asia, the vast majority of whom live in the Arabian Gulf. Conflict would put them all in danger, as it did at the start of the 1990s, when the US went to war with Iraq and New Delhi had to arrange an airlift of more than 110,000 Indian citizens.But even if there isnt all-out conflict, heightened tensions could hurt the economies of the region, and endanger the jobs of many Indians. Already the events of the last few years, including inter-regional conflict between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, employment nationalisation drives in a number of countries and Dubais struggles to recover from economic crisis, have hurt the diaspora.Kerala has already begun coming to terms with the idea that many more will return. A sudden jolt would put pressure on the places Indians return to, and also endanger the $40 billion in remittances India receives from West Asia - more than 50% of all remittances to the country, a key source of foreign exchange.Then there is the question of oil prices. Though international prices have gone up by 4% since the strike on Soleimani, analysts do not currently expect them to get much higher - presuming it is in no ones interests for that to happen and that both the US and Iran will back down from outright conflict.Yet if that presumption is wrong, India will face some difficult times. Although India does not now import much oil from Iran, it is still heavily reliant on the Strait of Hormuz - the tiny span of water through which a quarter of the worlds oil and a third of its natural gas travels. Higher oil prices would automatically mean inflation in India, where analysts are already worried about rising food prices.Even if Indias economy were on a more stable footing, conflict in the region would be dangerous. But the current tensions, coming as they do when the Indian economy seems poised on a precipice, should be even more alarming for policymakers.Q. Which one of the following CANNOT be inferred from the information given in the fifth paragraph?

India really cannot handle tension in West Asia right now.That may seem obvious: after all, any escalation in hostilities between Iran and the United States, after the latter killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, will have a huge impact across the region and beyond. Its not for nothing that "World War 3" trended on Twitter on Friday.There are two primary dangers for India, other than the extremely destabilising effects of any outright war in the region.One, there are 8 million Indians living and working in West Asia, the vast majority of whom live in the Arabian Gulf. Conflict would put them all in danger, as it did at the start of the 1990s, when the US went to war with Iraq and New Delhi had to arrange an airlift of more than 110,000 Indian citizens.But even if there isnt all-out conflict, heightened tensions could hurt the economies of the region, and endanger the jobs of many Indians. Already the events of the last few years, including inter-regional conflict between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, employment nationalisation drives in a number of countries and Dubais struggles to recover from economic crisis, have hurt the diaspora.Kerala has already begun coming to terms with the idea that many more will return. A sudden jolt would put pressure on the places Indians return to, and also endanger the $40 billion in remittances India receives from West Asia - more than 50% of all remittances to the country, a key source of foreign exchange.Then there is the question of oil prices. Though international prices have gone up by 4% since the strike on Soleimani, analysts do not currently expect them to get much higher - presuming it is in no ones interests for that to happen and that both the US and Iran will back down from outright conflict.Yet if that presumption is wrong, India will face some difficult times. Although India does not now import much oil from Iran, it is still heavily reliant on the Strait of Hormuz - the tiny span of water through which a quarter of the worlds oil and a third of its natural gas travels. Higher oil prices would automatically mean inflation in India, where analysts are already worried about rising food prices.Even if Indias economy were on a more stable footing, conflict in the region would be dangerous. But the current tensions, coming as they do when the Indian economy seems poised on a precipice, should be even more alarming for policymakers.Q. Which one of the following CANNOT be inferred from the information given in the fifth paragraph?

India really cannot handle tension in West Asia right now.That may seem obvious: after all, any escalation in hostilities between Iran and the United States, after the latter killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, will have a huge impact across the region and beyond. Its not for nothing that "World War 3" trended on Twitter on Friday.There are two primary dangers for India, other than the extremely destabilising effects of any outright war in the region.One, there are 8 million Indians living and working in West Asia, the vast majority of whom live in the Arabian Gulf. Conflict would put them all in danger, as it did at the start of the 1990s, when the US went to war with Iraq and New Delhi had to arrange an airlift of more than 110,000 Indian citizens.But even if there isnt all-out conflict, heightened tensions could hurt the economies of the region, and endanger the jobs of many Indians. Already the events of the last few years, including inter-regional conflict between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, employment nationalisation drives in a number of countries and Dubais struggles to recover from economic crisis, have hurt the diaspora.Kerala has already begun coming to terms with the idea that many more will return. A sudden jolt would put pressure on the places Indians return to, and also endanger the $40 billion in remittances India receives from West Asia - more than 50% of all remittances to the country, a key source of foreign exchange.Then there is the question of oil prices. Though international prices have gone up by 4% since the strike on Soleimani, analysts do not currently expect them to get much higher - presuming it is in no ones interests for that to happen and that both the US and Iran will back down from outright conflict.Yet if that presumption is wrong, India will face some difficult times. Although India does not now import much oil from Iran, it is still heavily reliant on the Strait of Hormuz - the tiny span of water through which a quarter of the worlds oil and a third of its natural gas travels. Higher oil prices would automatically mean inflation in India, where analysts are already worried about rising food prices.Even if Indias economy were on a more stable footing, conflict in the region would be dangerous. But the current tensions, coming as they do when the Indian economy seems poised on a precipice, should be even more alarming for policymakers.Q. Why does the author believe that the heightened tension (fourth paragraph) could jeopardise jobs of Indian working abroad?

The eye-popping bids in the current auction of wireless frequencies by the Federal Communications Commission are a testament to soaring demand for mobile Internet service. As of last week, bids in the auction exceeded $38 billion, far more than the $10.5 billion reserve price set by the F.C.C. These frequencies, also known as spectrum, are needed to expand cellular networks so they can carry more phone calls and data.The superheated bidding provides fresh evidence that the telecommunications industry is thriving despite protests by executives at companies like Verizon and AT&T that they are being stymied by regulation. Phone companies are upset that President Obama recently called for strong rules that would prohibit telecom companies, including wireless businesses, from creating fast and slow lanes on the Internet. His proposal needs to be approved by the F.C.C., an independent agency that is not obliged to do what Mr. Obama wants but that in this case should follow his direction.Telecom executives have said that such rules would reduce their incentive to invest, presumably because their potential profits would be reduced by any regulation that prevented them from charging fees to big web businesses to deliver some content to consumers faster than other information. But the companies cant be all that worried if they are willing to spend billions of dollars on wireless frequencies.Some of the money raised in the auction will be used to pay for a $7 billion communications network called FirstNet, for police, fire and other public safety agencies, a network Congress authorized in 2012. The rest of the money will go to the Treasury and help reduce the federal deficit.Few people expected that the bids would go this high for spectrum that most analysts say is less optimal for carrying wireless phone signals than other, lower frequency airwaves that more easily penetrate buildings.A separate auction that is expected to be held in 2021 will include more highly valued airwaves that are used by television broadcasters. A portion of the money bid by telecom companies in that auction will be used to pay TV stations that agree to give up some or all of the frequencies they are using.The auction of TV airwaves was originally expected to take place next year but has been delayed because of disagreements among broadcasters, telecom companies and regulators about how it should be carried out. There are billions of dollars at stake for television stations and phone companies. The high bids in the current auction should encourage them to resolve their differences and avoid further delays. They all have too much to gain from a successful auction.Americans are increasingly dependent on their cellphones - 63 percent of Americans used their phones to go online in 2013, up from 31 percent in 2009, according to the Pew Research Center. That helps explain why wireless frequencies are becoming more valuable and why the government should make sure spectrum is used efficiently.Q. Which of the following is not true as per the passage?

If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is?
Question Description
If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is?.
Solutions for If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is?, a detailed solution for If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? has been provided alongside types of If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice If n>2 then the number of surjection that can be defined from (1,2,3,.n) onto (1,2) is? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev