Possible answer:

Democratic and Non-Democratic Countries

A democratic country is one where the people have the power to elect their leaders and make decisions through free and fair elections, and where the government is accountable to the people and respects their basic rights and freedoms. A non-democratic country is one where the power is concentrated in the hands of a few individuals or groups, who often use force or fraud to maintain their control, and where the people have limited or no say in how they are governed.

Good Democratic Country: Norway

Norway is a good example of a democratic country. Norway has a parliamentary system of government, where the people elect representatives to the Storting (parliament) every four years. The Storting has 169 members who are chosen by a proportional representation system, which gives smaller parties a chance to gain seats. The government is led by a Prime Minister, who is appointed by the King but has to enjoy the confidence of the Storting. The Prime Minister and the Cabinet are accountable to the Storting and can be removed by a vote of no confidence. Norway has a multi-party system, with several parties competing for votes and forming coalitions to govern. Norway also has a strong tradition of civic participation, with high levels of voter turnout, active civil society organizations, and a free media.

Good Non-Democratic Country: Singapore

Singapore is a good example of a non-democratic country. Singapore has a one-party dominant system of government, where the People's Action Party (PAP) has been in power since independence in 1965. The PAP has maintained its control through a combination of electoral rules that favor the ruling party, restrictions on free speech and assembly, and a powerful state apparatus that monitors and suppresses dissent. However, Singapore has also achieved remarkable economic growth and social stability, with high levels of education, health, and security. Singapore has been able to attract foreign investment and talent, and has developed a reputation for efficiency and innovation.

Conclusion

In conclusion, while democracy is generally considered to be a better form of government than non-democracy, there are exceptions and variations in how democracies and non-democracies work in practice. Norway and Singapore illustrate some of the strengths and weaknesses of democratic and non-democratic systems, and suggest that the quality of governance depends on many factors, including political culture, economic development, social cohesion, and global context.

Democratic Country is the best because in a democratic country people have the right to vote ,right to freedom and other rights but in non-democratic country there are no rights for people.