The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > The passage given below is followed by four ...

Join the Discussion on the App

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.

Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.

a)
A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.
b)
Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.
c)
If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.
d)
Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Verbal For CAT 2018 ( Slot - II)

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the opt...

In the given paragraph, the author has discussed about Bad Samaritan laws and whether it is enforceable by law. While answering the question, the author puts forward three points which she deems necessary for the implementation of Bad Samaritan law. Only after crossing the three obstacles mentioned by the author, the law should be enacted. Option D is the most relevant in this context.

Option A is about implementing the law without any conditions, which is not what the author wants to convey.

Option B does not mention anything about the three obstacles.

Option C is stated with a firmness which is not the tone of the author. The author says that the law may be enacted, not must be enacted.

Hence, option D is the correct answer.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the opt...

Author's Position on Bad Samaritan Laws

Introduction:
The author raises the question of whether the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril should be enforced by criminal law, specifically mentioning bad Samaritan laws.

Challenges to Proponents of Bad Samaritan Laws:
1. Morally Legitimate: Proponents must demonstrate that enforcing a duty to aid others is morally legitimate in principle.
2. Enforceability: They must show that this duty can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts.
3. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Proponents need to prove that the benefits of these laws outweigh their problems, risks, and costs.

Author's Position:
The author's position is that while bad Samaritan laws may be desirable, they must undergo rigorous testing to ensure they are legally sound before being enacted. This suggests a cautious approach to implementing such laws, emphasizing the need for thorough examination of their legal implications and enforceability.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Attention CAT Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws?Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question:Certain forms of personal righteousness have become to a majority of the humans almost automatic. It is as easy for most of us to keep from stealing our dinners as it is to digest them, and there is quite as much voluntary morality involved in one process as in the other. To steal would be for us to fall sadly below the standard of habit and expectation which makes virtue easy. In the same way we have been carefully reared to a sense of family obligation, to be kindly and considerate to the members of our own households, and to feel responsible for their well-being. As the rules of conduct have become established in regard to our self-development and our families, so they have been in regard to limited circles of friends. If the fulfillment of these claims were all that a righteous life required, the hunger and thirst would be stilled for many good men and women, and the clew of right living would lie easily in their hands.But we all know that each generation has its own test, the contemporaneous and current standard by which alone it can adequately judge of its own moral achievements, and that it may not legitimately use a previous and less vigorous test. The advanced test must indeed include that which has already been attained; but if it includes no more, we shall fail to go forward, thinking complacently that we have "arrived" when in reality we have not yet started.To attain individual morality in an age demanding social morality, to pride ones self on the results of personal effort when the time demands social adjustment, is utterly to fail to apprehend the situation. It is perhaps significant that a German critic has of late reminded us that the one test which the most authoritative and dramatic portrayal of the Day of Judgment offers, is the social test. The stern questions are not in regard to personal and family relations, but did ye visit the poor, the criminal, the sick, and did ye feed the hungry?All about us are men and women who have become unhappy in regard to their attitude toward the social order itself; toward the dreary round of uninteresting work, the pleasures narrowed down to those of appetite, the declining consciousness of brain power, and the lack of mental food which characterizes the lot of the large proportion of their fellow-citizens. These men and women have caught a moral challenge raised by the exigencies of contemporaneous life; some are bewildered, others who are denied the relief which sturdy action brings are even seeking an escape, but all are increasingly anxious concerning their actual relations to the basic organization of society.The test which they would apply to their conduct is a social test. They fail to be content with the fulfillment of their family and personal obligations, and find themselves striving to respond to a new demand involving a social obligation; they have become conscious of another requirement, and the contribution they would make is toward a code of social ethics.Q.According to the passage, which is the least suitable statement about "righteousness" mentioned in the passage?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question:Certain forms of personal righteousness have become to a majority of the humans almost automatic. It is as easy for most of us to keep from stealing our dinners as it is to digest them, and there is quite as much voluntary morality involved in one process as in the other. To steal would be for us to fall sadly below the standard of habit and expectation which makes virtue easy. In the same way we have been carefully reared to a sense of family obligation, to be kindly and considerate to the members of our own households, and to feel responsible for their well-being. As the rules of conduct have become established in regard to our self-development and our families, so they have been in regard to limited circles of friends. If the fulfillment of these claims were all that a righteous life required, the hunger and thirst would be stilled for many good men and women, and the clew of right living would lie easily in their hands.But we all know that each generation has its own test, the contemporaneous and current standard by which alone it can adequately judge of its own moral achievements, and that it may not legitimately use a previous and less vigorous test. The advanced test must indeed include that which has already been attained; but if it includes no more, we shall fail to go forward, thinking complacently that we have "arrived" when in reality we have not yet started.To attain individual morality in an age demanding social morality, to pride ones self on the results of personal effort when the time demands social adjustment, is utterly to fail to apprehend the situation. It is perhaps significant that a German critic has of late reminded us that the one test which the most authoritative and dramatic portrayal of the Day of Judgment offers, is the social test. The stern questions are not in regard to personal and family relations, but did ye visit the poor, the criminal, the sick, and did ye feed the hungry?All about us are men and women who have become unhappy in regard to their attitude toward the social order itself; toward the dreary round of uninteresting work, the pleasures narrowed down to those of appetite, the declining consciousness of brain power, and the lack of mental food which characterizes the lot of the large proportion of their fellow-citizens. These men and women have caught a moral challenge raised by the exigencies of contemporaneous life; some are bewildered, others who are denied the relief which sturdy action brings are even seeking an escape, but all are increasingly anxious concerning their actual relations to the basic organization of society.The test which they would apply to their conduct is a social test. They fail to be content with the fulfillment of their family and personal obligations, and find themselves striving to respond to a new demand involving a social obligation; they have become conscious of another requirement, and the contribution they would make is toward a code of social ethics.Q.Which of the following statement can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

Read the passage carefully and answer the following question:Certain forms of personal righteousness have become to a majority of the humans almost automatic. It is as easy for most of us to keep from stealing our dinners as it is to digest them, and there is quite as much voluntary morality involved in one process as in the other. To steal would be for us to fall sadly below the standard of habit and expectation which makes virtue easy. In the same way we have been carefully reared to a sense of family obligation, to be kindly and considerate to the members of our own households, and to feel responsible for their well-being. As the rules of conduct have become established in regard to our self-development and our families, so they have been in regard to limited circles of friends. If the fulfillment of these claims were all that a righteous life required, the hunger and thirst would be stilled for many good men and women, and the clew of right living would lie easily in their hands.But we all know that each generation has its own test, the contemporaneous and current standard by which alone it can adequately judge of its own moral achievements, and that it may not legitimately use a previous and less vigorous test. The advanced test must indeed include that which has already been attained; but if it includes no more, we shall fail to go forward, thinking complacently that we have "arrived" when in reality we have not yet started.To attain individual morality in an age demanding social morality, to pride ones self on the results of personal effort when the time demands social adjustment, is utterly to fail to apprehend the situation. It is perhaps significant that a German critic has of late reminded us that the one test which the most authoritative and dramatic portrayal of the Day of Judgment offers, is the social test. The stern questions are not in regard to personal and family relations, but did ye visit the poor, the criminal, the sick, and did ye feed the hungry?All about us are men and women who have become unhappy in regard to their attitude toward the social order itself; toward the dreary round of uninteresting work, the pleasures narrowed down to those of appetite, the declining consciousness of brain power, and the lack of mental food which characterizes the lot of the large proportion of their fellow-citizens. These men and women have caught a moral challenge raised by the exigencies of contemporaneous life; some are bewildered, others who are denied the relief which sturdy action brings are even seeking an escape, but all are increasingly anxious concerning their actual relations to the basic organization of society.The test which they would apply to their conduct is a social test. They fail to be content with the fulfillment of their family and personal obligations, and find themselves striving to respond to a new demand involving a social obligation; they have become conscious of another requirement, and the contribution they would make is toward a code of social ethics.Q.Which of the following is not a consequence of the consciousness towards the demand of a social obligation?

View answer

Group QuestionAnswer the questions based on the passage given below.The US Treasury Department recently announced that it would start demanding details of the shell companies that rich foreigners use to buy real estate in Manhattan and Miami-Dade County. This is a good step that should help law enforcement agencies crack down on money laundering, tax evasion and other crimes. The program should be broadened to cover the whole country, and must be forcefully carried out.In recent years, there have been certain sections of people that have stashed billions of dollars of wealth in the United States by buying property and other costly assets. These purchases are generally made through limited liability corporations that are not required to disclose their wealthy owners or beneficiaries. While limited liability corporations have many legitimate purposes, there is no justification for allowing owners to shield their identities even from law enforcement and regulators. The secrecy is so complete that law enforcement officials say they are often unable to identify the true owners. All efforts by lawmakers have been thwarted by lobbying from the financial and real estate industries and state governments.The department currently requires mortgage lenders to know the identities of the true owners of shell companies in transactions that involve loans. Under the new policy, the departments Financial Crimes Enforcement Network will require details of limited liability companies that buy properties without loans. However, the order applies only to Manhattan and Miami-Dade County, and will be effective for only 180 days, starting in March.The department should also adopt pending regulations that would require financial firms to know who owns the limited liability companies whose accounts they manage. It is absurd that regulators would not require such basic transparency as a matter of course. The current system practically lays out the welcome mat for some foreigners hiding assets from their governments, making United States one of the worlds biggest tax havens.Supporters of the current system may argue that requiring more transparency would burden financial institutions without ending money laundering and tax evasion, since determined criminals will find ways to thwart the law. But that doesnt justify doing nothing about this hole in financial regulations.Q.From the context, a shell company can be inferred to be

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

Crash Course for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series 2024

3 Months Preparation for CAT

CAT Mock Test Series and 500+ Practice Tests 2024

Top Courses for CAT

View all

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Should the moral obligation to rescue and aid persons in grave peril, felt by a few, be enforced by the criminal law? Should we follow the lead of a number of European countries and enact bad Samaritan laws? Proponents of bad Samaritan laws must overcome at least three different sorts of obstacles. First, they must show the laws are morally legitimate in principle, that is, that the duty to aid others is a proper candidate for legal enforcement. Second, they must show that this duty to aid can be defined in a way that can be fairly enforced by the courts. Third, they must show that the benefits of the laws are worth their problems, risks and costs.a) A number of European countries that have successfully enacted bad Samaritan laws may serve as model statutes.b) Everyone agrees that people ought to aid others, the only debate is whether to have a law on it.c) If bad Samaritan laws are found to be legally sound and enforceable they must be enacted.d) Bad Samaritan laws may be desirable but they need to be tested for legal soundness.Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam