Question Description
A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice A Japanese government panel announced that it recommends regulating only genetically modified organisms that have had foreign genes permanently introduced into their genomes and not those whose endogenous genes have been edited. The only stipulation is that researchers and businesses will have to register their modifications to plants or animals with the government, with the exception of microbes cultured in contained environments. Reactions to the decision are mixed. While lauding the potential benefits of genome editing, an editorial opposes across-the-board permission. Unforeseen risks in gene editing cannot be ruled out. All genetically modified products must go through the same safety and labeling processes regardless of method.a) Excepting microbes cultured in contained environments from the regulations of genome editing is prematureb) Creating categories within genetically modified products in terms of transgenic modification and genome editing advances science but defies laws.c) Exempting from regulations the editing of endogenous genes is not desirable as this procedure might be risk-prone.d) A government panel in Japan says transgenic modification and genome editing are not the same.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.