Why did the servants refuse to help ?a)out of fearsb)because of superstitionsc)because he was an American Soldierd)All theseCorrect answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > Why did the servants refuse to help ?a)out o...

Join the Discussion on the App

Why did the servants refuse to help ?

a)
out of fears
b)
because of superstitions
c)
because he was an American Soldier
d)
All these

Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: The Enemy- 3

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Why did the servants refuse to help ?a)out of fearsb)because of super...

Possible answer:

The servants refused to help the American Soldier due to a combination of fears and superstitions. Let's examine each factor in more detail.

Fears:

- The British Raj, which controlled India during World War II, had strict rules about fraternizing with enemy soldiers.
- The Indian caste system also placed limits on who could touch or serve whom, reinforcing social hierarchies that were based on birth rather than merit.
- The soldiers themselves were often seen as intimidating figures, with guns, uniforms, and unfamiliar languages and customs.
- The servants may have been afraid of being punished or ostracized if they were caught aiding a foreigner, especially one who was wounded or ill.
- They may have also feared for their own safety, as the war created widespread disruption and violence in many parts of India.

Superstitions:

- India has a rich and diverse tradition of religious and folk beliefs that can shape people's attitudes and actions.
- Some superstitions may have led the servants to believe that helping a wounded or sick person could bring bad luck or evil spirits into their homes.
- For example, the soldier's blood, sweat, or breath may have been seen as contaminated or polluting.
- Similarly, touching a foreigner's belongings or body parts could violate taboos related to purity or hygiene.
- Some superstitions may have also reinforced prejudices against certain groups, such as Americans, who were seen as outsiders or aggressors.

Overall, the combination of fears and superstitions likely contributed to the servants' refusal to help the American Soldier. However, it's worth noting that not all Indians shared these views, and many risked their lives to assist Allied troops during the war. The story of the soldier and the servants highlights the complex and diverse nature of Indian society during a tumultuous period in history.

Free Test

FREE

Test: The Enemy- 3
15 Ques | 10 Min

Start Free Test

View all free Class 12 tests

Community Answer

Why did the servants refuse to help ?a)out of fearsb)because of super...

All of these

Share via Whatsapp

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

When the "Great War for the Empire" (often incorrectly referred to as the "Seven Years War") ended in 1763, Great Britain was deeply in debt, but was ceded some first rate real estate, namely Canada. The war itself had been conducted on a global scale, including the French and Indian Wars in North America, and it took two separate treaties to terminate hostilities (the treaty of Paris and the treaty of Hubertus burg.) Every major power inEurope participated in the war, and on a vast geographical scale that included hostilities along the African Coast, in Central and North America, India and the Philippines, all at great expense to the participants.The explanations of the origins of the War are exceptionally intricate and unmemorable.The Great War included our French and Indian War, which pitted Britain against France in the New World.The colonists, especially from Massachusetts and Connecticut, contributed money and troops to the effort and after the war Britain reimbursed the colonies £ 1,072, 783, a third of which went to Massachusetts in light of its proportionately greater contribution. This roughly halved the war debts of the Colonies. Gipson described this British largesse as “unprecedented” in the sense that it was apparently the first time in modern history that a parent state reimbursed its colonies for such expenditures. On the other hand, Britain evidently imposed a one shilling per pound tax on tea imported into the American colonies.When the smoke of war cleared, Britains public debt was a then staggering sum of £146,000,000, and called for annual interest payments of £4,700,000 which left the British citizenry “with little prospect of reducing the heavy load of taxation.” On the other hand, the War had brought “unprecedented prosperity” to the colonies, even great fortunes, because of the “shipment of vast sums of . . . specie from England to America, not only as pay for the soldiers, teamsters, army pioneers, bateau-men, and others, but also for the purchase at good prices of enormous quantities of food, supplies and other things needed for carrying on the war.”There were other effects as well, all of which presented some peril for Britain; the American colonies soon emerged as an economic powerhouse, soon out producing Britain in, ships and steel because of its natural advantages. In Great Britain, in the 1760’s there was almost a 100% face value tax on imported tea.This was comprised of a 25% import tax on face value plus an additional excise of 25% plus 1 shilling per pound for tea sold for domestic consumption.Q. The use of the word specie in the passage denotes

View answer

When the "Great War for the Empire" (often incorrectly referred to as the "Seven Years War") ended in 1763, Great Britain was deeply in debt, but was ceded some first rate real estate, namely Canada. The war itself had been conducted on a global scale, including the French and Indian Wars in North America, and it took two separate treaties to terminate hostilities (the treaty of Paris and the treaty of Hubertus burg.) Every major power inEurope participated in the war, and on a vast geographical scale that included hostilities along the African Coast, in Central and North America, India and the Philippines, all at great expense to the participants.The explanations of the origins of the War are exceptionally intricate and unmemorable.The Great War included our French and Indian War, which pitted Britain against France in the New World.The colonists, especially from Massachusetts and Connecticut, contributed money and troops to the effort and after the war Britain reimbursed the colonies £ 1,072, 783, a third of which went to Massachusetts in light of its proportionately greater contribution. This roughly halved the war debts of the Colonies. Gipson described this British largesse as “unprecedented” in the sense that it was apparently the first time in modern history that a parent state reimbursed its colonies for such expenditures. On the other hand, Britain evidently imposed a one shilling per pound tax on tea imported into the American colonies.When the smoke of war cleared, Britains public debt was a then staggering sum of £146,000,000, and called for annual interest payments of £4,700,000 which left the British citizenry “with little prospect of reducing the heavy load of taxation.” On the other hand, the War had brought “unprecedented prosperity” to the colonies, even great fortunes, because of the “shipment of vast sums of . . . specie from England to America, not only as pay for the soldiers, teamsters, army pioneers, bateau-men, and others, but also for the purchase at good prices of enormous quantities of food, supplies and other things needed for carrying on the war.”There were other effects as well, all of which presented some peril for Britain; the American colonies soon emerged as an economic powerhouse, soon out producing Britain in, ships and steel because of its natural advantages. In Great Britain, in the 1760’s there was almost a 100% face value tax on imported tea.This was comprised of a 25% import tax on face value plus an additional excise of 25% plus 1 shilling per pound for tea sold for domestic consumption.Q. "Gipson described this British largesse…" What is the largesse that Gipson is referring to?

View answer

When the "Great War for the Empire" (often incorrectly referred to as the "Seven Years War") ended in 1763, Great Britain was deeply in debt, but was ceded some first rate real estate, namely Canada. The war itself had been conducted on a global scale, including the French and Indian Wars in North America, and it took two separate treaties to terminate hostilities (the treaty of Paris and the treaty of Hubertus burg.) Every major power inEurope participated in the war, and on a vast geographical scale that included hostilities along the African Coast, in Central and North America, India and the Philippines, all at great expense to the participants.The explanations of the origins of the War are exceptionally intricate and unmemorable.The Great War included our French and Indian War, which pitted Britain against France in the New World.The colonists, especially from Massachusetts and Connecticut, contributed money and troops to the effort and after the war Britain reimbursed the colonies £ 1,072, 783, a third of which went to Massachusetts in light of its proportionately greater contribution. This roughly halved the war debts of the Colonies. Gipson described this British largesse as “unprecedented” in the sense that it was apparently the first time in modern history that a parent state reimbursed its colonies for such expenditures. On the other hand, Britain evidently imposed a one shilling per pound tax on tea imported into the American colonies.When the smoke of war cleared, Britains public debt was a then staggering sum of £146,000,000, and called for annual interest payments of £4,700,000 which left the British citizenry “with little prospect of reducing the heavy load of taxation.” On the other hand, the War had brought “unprecedented prosperity” to the colonies, even great fortunes, because of the “shipment of vast sums of . . . specie from England to America, not only as pay for the soldiers, teamsters, army pioneers, bateau-men, and others, but also for the purchase at good prices of enormous quantities of food, supplies and other things needed for carrying on the war.”There were other effects as well, all of which presented some peril for Britain; the American colonies soon emerged as an economic powerhouse, soon out producing Britain in, ships and steel because of its natural advantages. In Great Britain, in the 1760’s there was almost a 100% face value tax on imported tea.This was comprised of a 25% import tax on face value plus an additional excise of 25% plus 1 shilling per pound for tea sold for domestic consumption.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?

View answer

When the "Great War for the Empire" (often incorrectly referred to as the "Seven Years War") ended in 1763, Great Britain was deeply in debt, but was ceded some first rate real estate, namely Canada. The war itself had been conducted on a global scale, including the French and Indian Wars in North America, and it took two separate treaties to terminate hostilities (the treaty of Paris and the treaty of Hubertus burg.) Every major power inEurope participated in the war, and on a vast geographical scale that included hostilities along the African Coast, in Central and North America, India and the Philippines, all at great expense to the participants.The explanations of the origins of the War are exceptionally intricate and unmemorable.The Great War included our French and Indian War, which pitted Britain against France in the New World.The colonists, especially from Massachusetts and Connecticut, contributed money and troops to the effort and after the war Britain reimbursed the colonies £ 1,072, 783, a third of which went to Massachusetts in light of its proportionately greater contribution. This roughly halved the war debts of the Colonies. Gipson described this British largesse as “unprecedented” in the sense that it was apparently the first time in modern history that a parent state reimbursed its colonies for such expenditures. On the other hand, Britain evidently imposed a one shilling per pound tax on tea imported into the American colonies.When the smoke of war cleared, Britains public debt was a then staggering sum of £146,000,000, and called for annual interest payments of £4,700,000 which left the British citizenry “with little prospect of reducing the heavy load of taxation.” On the other hand, the War had brought “unprecedented prosperity” to the colonies, even great fortunes, because of the “shipment of vast sums of . . . specie from England to America, not only as pay for the soldiers, teamsters, army pioneers, bateau-men, and others, but also for the purchase at good prices of enormous quantities of food, supplies and other things needed for carrying on the war.”There were other effects as well, all of which presented some peril for Britain; the American colonies soon emerged as an economic powerhouse, soon out producing Britain in, ships and steel because of its natural advantages. In Great Britain, in the 1760’s there was almost a 100% face value tax on imported tea.This was comprised of a 25% import tax on face value plus an additional excise of 25% plus 1 shilling per pound for tea sold for domestic consumption.Q. Which one(s) of the following would possibly NOT be reason(s) for the prosperity of British colonies in America?1. The colonies produced more ships and steel than Britain.2. Transfer of large sums of money from Britain to the colonies.3. The colonies contributed money and troops to the war effort.4. Britain imposed tax on import of tea into the colonies.5. Britain had a very high public debt at the end of the war.