What is the difference in who exercises executive power in the above t...
Executive Power in the Two Constitutions of Nepal
The first constitution of Nepal was promulgated in 1951, which established the monarchy as the executive power. The king had the authority to appoint and dismiss prime ministers and other government officials. The monarch had absolute power and could overrule any decision made by the government.
The second constitution of Nepal was promulgated in 1990, which established a constitutional monarchy. The king was still the head of state, but the executive power was shared with the prime minister and the cabinet. The prime minister was appointed by the king, but the king had to act on the advice of the prime minister.
Why Nepal Needs a New Constitution Today
Despite the 1990 constitution, Nepal has faced political instability and conflict for several years. In 2006, a peace agreement was signed between the government and the Maoist rebels, which led to the formation of a new interim government. The interim government was tasked with drafting a new constitution that would address the demands of the Maoists and other marginalized groups.
The new constitution was finally promulgated in 2015, which established Nepal as a federal democratic republic. The president is the head of state, while the prime minister is the head of government. The constitution also guarantees fundamental rights and freedoms, such as freedom of speech, press, and assembly.
However, there are still some challenges that Nepal faces today that require a new constitution. These challenges include:
- The need to address the demands of marginalized groups, such as the Madhesis and Janajatis.
- The need to decentralize power and ensure greater representation and participation at the local level.
- The need to address issues related to governance, corruption, and accountability.
- The need to address issues related to economic development and social justice.
A new constitution could help address these challenges by providing a more inclusive and democratic framework for governance. It could also help strengthen the rule of law, promote transparency and accountability, and ensure greater participation and representation for all Nepalis.