Rudyard Kipling, a renowned English writer, and his wife both expressed their strong disapproval of interviews, considering them to be an immoral and offensive crime against a person. Let's explore the reasons behind their viewpoint.

1. Invasion of Privacy: Kipling and his wife believed that interviews were a violation of an individual's privacy. They felt that the public had no right to pry into their personal lives and that interviews forced them to reveal intimate details that they wished to keep private.

2. Manipulation of Words: Another reason for their disapproval was the potential for interviews to manipulate or misinterpret their words. They believed that journalists often twisted their statements to fit their own narratives or sensationalize the content, leading to a misrepresentation of their ideas and beliefs.

3. Loss of Control: Kipling and his wife felt that interviews took away their control over their own thoughts and ideas. They believed that journalists often imposed their own perspectives and biases on the interviewee, distorting the intended message.

4. Sensationalism and Intrusion: The couple also expressed their disdain for the sensationalism associated with interviews. They believed that journalists often focused on scandalous or controversial aspects of their lives, invading their personal space and causing unnecessary stress and discomfort.

5. Dehumanization: Additionally, Kipling and his wife argued that interviews reduced individuals to mere objects of public curiosity. They believed that the constant scrutiny and intrusion into their personal lives stripped them of their humanity, turning them into mere subjects of gossip and speculation.

In conclusion, Rudyard Kipling and his wife strongly opposed interviews, considering them to be an immoral and offensive crime against an individual. They believed that interviews invaded their privacy, manipulated their words, imposed external perspectives, sensationalized their lives, and dehumanized them. Their disapproval stemmed from the negative impact that interviews had on their personal lives and their ability to control their own narrative.