Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French languag...

Join the Discussion on the App

Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?

a)
Because it was the clearest and logical
b)
Because it was his native language
c)
Because people were from France
d)
None of these

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: The Last Lesson- 3

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Verified Answer

Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Be...

M Hamel called French the most beautiful language in the world. According to him, it was the clearest and the most logical language. He wanted the people of France to guard it amongst themselves and never forget it.

View all questions of this test

Most Upvoted Answer

Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Be...

Explanation:

The story "The Last Lesson" is written by Alphonse Daudet. It is a story of a small French village, where the last lesson of French language was being taught by Mr. M. Hamel. The story revolves around the importance of language and education.

In the story, Mr. M. Hamel called the French language the most beautiful because of the following reasons:

1. Clarity and Logical: According to Mr. M. Hamel, French is the clearest and most logical language. It has a clear and precise structure, which makes it easy to understand and learn.

2. Rich Vocabulary: French language is known for its rich vocabulary. It has a vast collection of words, phrases, and expressions, which makes it a beautiful language.

3. Cultural Heritage: French language is a part of French culture and heritage. It is a language that has been spoken for centuries and has a rich history and tradition.

4. Literature and Art: French language has a long and rich literary and artistic tradition. It is the language of great writers and artists like Victor Hugo, Emile Zola, Claude Monet, and many others.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Mr. M. Hamel called the French language the most beautiful because of its clarity, logical structure, rich vocabulary, cultural heritage, and literary and artistic tradition. It is a language that has played a significant role in shaping the French culture and identity.

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow:M. Hamel went on to talk of the French language, saying that it was the most beautiful language in the world — the clearest, the most logical; that we must guard it among us and never forget it, because when people are enslaved, as long as they hold fast to their language it is as if they had the key to their prison. Then he opened a grammar book and read us our lesson. I was amazed to see how well I understood it. All he said seemed so easy, so easy!Q. Franz was able to understand the grammar lesson easily because he was___________ .

View answer

Read the given passages and answer the questions that follow:M. Hamel went on to talk of the French language, saying that it was the most beautiful language in the world — the clearest, the most logical; that we must guard it among us and never forget it, because when people are enslaved, as long as they hold fast to their language it is as if they had the key to their prison. Then he opened a grammar book and read us our lesson. I was amazed to see how well I understood it. All he said seemed so easy, so easy!Q. Which of the following can be attributed to M. Hamel’s declaration about the French language?

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Which of the following can be said to be true about languages like Latin and Greek?

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Which of the following can be said to be true about languages like Latin and Greek?

View answer

Modern science has provided us a universal method by which we may study and master any subject. As applied to an art, this method has proved highly successful in the case of music. It has not been applied to language because there was a well fixed method of language study in existence long before modern science was even dreamed of, and that ancient method has held on with wonderful tenacity. The great fault with it is that it was invented to apply to languages entirely different from our own. Latin grammar and Greek grammar were mechanical systems of endings by which the relationships of words were indicated. Of course the relationship of words was at bottom logical, but the mechanical form was the chief thing to be learned. Our language depends wholly (or very nearly so) on arrangement of words, and the key is the logical relationship. A man who knows all the forms of the Latin or Greek language can write it with substantial accuracy; but the man who would master the English language must go deeper, he must master the logic of sentence structure or word relations. We must begin our study at just the opposite end from the Latin or Greek; but our teachers of language have balked at a complete reversal of method, the power of custom and time has been too strong, and in the matter of grammar we are still the slaves of the ancient world. As for spelling, the irregularities of our language seem to have driven us to one sole method, memorizing: and to memorize every word in a language is an appalling task. Our rhetoric we have inherited from the middle ages, from scholiasts, refiners, and theological logicians, a race of men who got their living by inventing distinctions and splitting hairs. The fact is, prose has had a very low place in the literature of the world until within a century; all that was worth saying was said in poetry, which the rhetoricians were forced to leave severely alone, or in oratory, from which all their rules were derived; and since written prose language became a universal possession through the printing press and the newspaper we have been too busy to invent a new rhetoric.Q. Why has the method, by which we may master any subject, not been applied to language?

View answer

Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Why did Mr. M. Hamel call the French language the most beautiful?a)Because it was the clearest and logicalb)Because it was his native languagec)Because people were from Franced)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam