How has the writer has proved the futility of king’s desire?a)by show...
Proving the Futility of King's Desire
The writer has effectively proved the futility of the king's desire in the following ways:
Toy Tiger as a Symbol
The writer uses a toy tiger as a symbol to show the king's desire as futile. The king's desire to hunt and kill a hundred tigers is portrayed as a childish obsession. The toy tiger represents the real tigers that the king wants to hunt. The king's desire to hunt the tigers is shown to be meaningless when compared to the toy tiger.
Victim of a Toy Tiger
The writer shows the king as a victim of the toy tiger. The king's obsession with hunting tigers leads him to kill 99 tigers, but he fails to catch the last one. The last tiger that the king fails to catch is the toy tiger, which symbolizes the futility of his desire. The king is shown as a victim of his own desire, which has made him blind to the reality of his situation.
Powerful King
Although the king is portrayed as a powerful figure, the writer proves the futility of his desire by showing that even a powerful king cannot achieve everything he desires. The king's power and wealth cannot buy him the satisfaction he seeks in hunting tigers. The writer shows that the king's desire is not only futile but also harmful to others, as he kills 99 tigers for his own satisfaction.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the writer has effectively proved the futility of the king's desire by using a toy tiger as a symbol, showing the king as a victim of his own desire, and highlighting the limitations of even a powerful king. The story serves as a cautionary tale against the dangers of obsession and desire.