The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the authorandrsquo;s position.The Labour Partyandrsquo;s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream leftandrsquo;s old electoral coalition - andshy;spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

CAT Exam > CAT Questions > The passage given below is followed by four s...

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.

The Labour Party’s troubles in England are not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.

a)
The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.
b)
The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.
c)
Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.
d)
The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Most Upvoted Answer

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the opti...

The author discusses a major issue plaguing the mainstream left in the passage- the growing political divide among its traditional support groups, which has led to a decline in the authority of the left across Europe. Each example mentioned in the paragraph, even the desperate measure mentioned in the last sentence, point towards the waning influence of the mainstream Left and social democracy in Europe.

Option A is a distortion. The people need not necessarily reject leftist ideals to endorse other political wings. They may simply agree more with the other alternatives.

Option B comes closest to the theme elucidated above. Option B is the answer.

Option C talks about a global decline, whereas the passage limits the discussion to the woes of the left in Europe.

Option D can be eliminated. The alternate political ideals endorsed by the supporters need not necessarily be new-age or modern. The author does not make such an assertion.

Answered by Wizius Careers · View profile

Community Answer

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the opti...

Option A is a distortion. The people need not necessarily reject leftist ideals to endorse other political wings. They may simply agree more with the other alternatives.

Option B comes closest to the theme elucidated above. Option B is the answer.

Option C talks about a global decline, whereas the passage limits the discussion to the woes of the left in Europe.

Option D can be eliminated. The alternate political ideals endorsed by the supporters need not necessarily be new-age or modern. The author does not make such an assertion.

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Read the passages carefully and answer the questions that follow :Time has many dimensions, is a concept often advanced to account for certain inexplicable happenings. The gist of the idea is that time - which seems to unfold in a linear way, with the past coming before the present and the present before the future - might, in another dimension, not be experienced sequentially. The past, present and future could exist simultaneously.The concept that there are unfamiliar dimensions of time is most easily approached by way of those dimensions with which we are already familiar, those of length, height and breadth. These, in turn, are best approached, quite literally, from a starting point, which, geometrically speaking, has a location but no dimensions. It does, however, relate to figures with dimensions in the following way: If a point is moved through space, it marks a line, with the one dimension of length. If a line is moved through space, it traces the figure of a plane with the two dimensions of length and breadth. And, if a plane is moved in space, it traces a figure with the three dimensions of length, breadth and height.We can also work backward to form a three-dimensional body and find that the cross section of the three-dimensional cube is a two-dimensional plane, the cross section of the two-dimensional plane is a one-dimensional line and that the cross section of the line is a dimensionless point. From this, we can infer that a body of three dimensions is the cross section of a body, when moved in a certain way, of four dimensions. Then comes the question, of what sort of body could a three-dimensional shape be the cross section? And, in what sort of new direction could a three-dimensional shape be moved to produce one of four dimensions, since a movement other than up and down, backward and forward or side to side would simply produce a larger figure, not one of a different dimension. The answer, of course, is the feature duration. For, as soon as something ceases to endure, it ceases to exit. To the three familiar dimensions, then, we should add duration in time as a fourth dimension. Ordinary, three-dimensional bodies should, therefore, be properly described as having only length, breadth and height but no duration. Is such a thing possible? It is, but only hypothetically. For in fact, the point, line and plane do not truly exist as such. Any line that can be seen has breadth as well as length (and duration), just as any physical plane has a certain thickness as well as length and breadth. What movement, then, must a figure of three dimensions undergo to produce a body of four dimensions?We moved a plane in the dimension of height to produce a cube, so the movement of a (hypothetical) cube in the dimension of time should produce a (real) figure of four dimensions. What does movement in the dimension of time mean? As we said, it must mean movement in a new direction, not up, down or sideways. Are there any other kinds of movement? For a start, there is the movement that the Earths rotation imparts to everything upon it and that puts even apparently motionless bodies in motion. Thus, we may say that the cross section of a real body, whose fourth dimension is duration, is inseparable from the motion that the turning world inevitably imparts to everything. Further, inevitable motions are that of the Earth around the Sun, of the Sun around the centre of the galaxy, and, perhaps, of the galaxy itself around some unknown point. Since any perceptible body is, in fact, undergoing all these motions simultaneously, we can say that it is ordinarily imperceptible. Because, motions and the dimensions, they imply, are only perceptible in a framework of time, they can be referred to as dimensions of time.If duration is one aspect of time, what might the others be? Among several possibilities, we can suggest appearance and disappearance, change and recurrence. Of all possibilities, only duration is perceptible. When we say that something is perceptible, we mean that we suddenly note its existence, when something disappears we note its lack of existence. We perceive no intermediate condition of appearing or disappearing. In the same way, we talk of change, but actually only develop the concept, as we perceive aggregates of characteristics that exist or cease to exist. And so we infer, but do not observe, the recurrence of sunset and sunrise, the passage of seasons, the growth of a child. And yet, things really do appear and disappear, change and recur, although not actually perceived to do so. They are, so to speak, hypothetical to us and must have their reality in other dimensions of time, just as the hypothetical three-dimensional body becomes real, that is, perceptible, in the dimension of time we call duration.If access to higher dimensions of time belongs to one body, it is at least theoretically possible that it belongs, though invisibly, to all bodies. We can further assume that such access is by way of unfamiliar modes or levels of consciousness – and that the name we give to one of these is prophecy.Q. The author mainly agrees with the idea that

View answer

Read the passages carefully and answer the questions that follow :Time has many dimensions, is a concept often advanced to account for certain inexplicable happenings. The gist of the idea is that time - which seems to unfold in a linear way, with the past coming before the present and the present before the future - might, in another dimension, not be experienced sequentially. The past, present and future could exist simultaneously.The concept that there are unfamiliar dimensions of time is most easily approached by way of those dimensions with which we are already familiar, those of length, height and breadth. These, in turn, are best approached, quite literally, from a starting point, which, geometrically speaking, has a location but no dimensions. It does, however, relate to figures with dimensions in the following way: If a point is moved through space, it marks a line, with the one dimension of length. If a line is moved through space, it traces the figure of a plane with the two dimensions of length and breadth. And, if a plane is moved in space, it traces a figure with the three dimensions of length, breadth and height.We can also work backward to form a three-dimensional body and find that the cross section of the three-dimensional cube is a two-dimensional plane, the cross section of the two-dimensional plane is a one-dimensional line and that the cross section of the line is a dimensionless point. From this, we can infer that a body of three dimensions is the cross section of a body, when moved in a certain way, of four dimensions. Then comes the question, of what sort of body could a three-dimensional shape be the cross section? And, in what sort of new direction could a three-dimensional shape be moved to produce one of four dimensions, since a movement other than up and down, backward and forward or side to side would simply produce a larger figure, not one of a different dimension. The answer, of course, is the feature duration. For, as soon as something ceases to endure, it ceases to exit. To the three familiar dimensions, then, we should add duration in time as a fourth dimension. Ordinary, three-dimensional bodies should, therefore, be properly described as having only length, breadth and height but no duration. Is such a thing possible? It is, but only hypothetically. For in fact, the point, line and plane do not truly exist as such. Any line that can be seen has breadth as well as length (and duration), just as any physical plane has a certain thickness as well as length and breadth. What movement, then, must a figure of three dimensions undergo to produce a body of four dimensions?We moved a plane in the dimension of height to produce a cube, so the movement of a (hypothetical) cube in the dimension of time should produce a (real) figure of four dimensions. What does movement in the dimension of time mean? As we said, it must mean movement in a new direction, not up, down or sideways. Are there any other kinds of movement? For a start, there is the movement that the Earths rotation imparts to everything upon it and that puts even apparently motionless bodies in motion. Thus, we may say that the cross section of a real body, whose fourth dimension is duration, is inseparable from the motion that the turning world inevitably imparts to everything. Further, inevitable motions are that of the Earth around the Sun, of the Sun around the centre of the galaxy, and, perhaps, of the galaxy itself around some unknown point. Since any perceptible body is, in fact, undergoing all these motions simultaneously, we can say that it is ordinarily imperceptible. Because, motions and the dimensions, they imply, are only perceptible in a framework of time, they can be referred to as dimensions of time.If duration is one aspect of time, what might the others be? Among several possibilities, we can suggest appearance and disappearance, change and recurrence. Of all possibilities, only duration is perceptible. When we say that something is perceptible, we mean that we suddenly note its existence, when something disappears we note its lack of existence. We perceive no intermediate condition of appearing or disappearing. In the same way, we talk of change, but actually only develop the concept, as we perceive aggregates of characteristics that exist or cease to exist. And so we infer, but do not observe, the recurrence of sunset and sunrise, the passage of seasons, the growth of a child. And yet, things really do appear and disappear, change and recur, although not actually perceived to do so. They are, so to speak, hypothetical to us and must have their reality in other dimensions of time, just as the hypothetical three-dimensional body becomes real, that is, perceptible, in the dimension of time we call duration.If access to higher dimensions of time belongs to one body, it is at least theoretically possible that it belongs, though invisibly, to all bodies. We can further assume that such access is by way of unfamiliar modes or levels of consciousness – and that the name we give to one of these is prophecy.Q. In the passage, the author has

View answer

Read the passages carefully and answer the questions that follow : Time has many dimensions, is a concept often advanced to account for certain inexplicable happenings. The gist of the idea is that time - which seems to unfold in a linear way, with the past coming before the present and the present before the future - might, in another dimension, not be experienced sequentially. The past, present and future could exist simultaneously. The concept that there are unfamiliar dimensions of time is most easily approached by way of those dimensions with which we are already familiar, those of length, height and breadth. These, in turn, are best approached, quite literally, from a starting point, which, geometrically speaking, has a location but no dimensions. It does, however, relate to figures with dimensions in the following way: If a point is moved through space, it marks a line, with the one dimension of length. If a line is moved through space, it traces the figure of a plane with the two dimensions of length and breadth. And, if a plane is moved in space, it traces a figure with the three dimensions of length, breadth and height. We can also work backward to form a three-dimensional body and find that the cross section of the three-dimensional cube is a two-dimensional plane, the cross section of the two-dimensional plane is a one-dimensional line and that the cross section of the line is a dimensionless point. From this, we can infer that a body of three dimensions is the cross section of a body, when moved in a certain way, of four dimensions. Then comes the question, of what sort of body could a three-dimensional shape be the cross section? And, in what sort of new direction could a three-dimensional shape be moved to produce one of four dimensions, since a movement other than up and down, backward and forward or side to side would simply produce a larger figure, not one of a different dimension. The answer, of course, is the feature duration. For, as soon as something ceases to endure, it ceases to exit. To the three familiar dimensions, then, we should add duration in time as a fourth dimension. Ordinary, three-dimensional bodies should, therefore, be properly described as having only length, breadth and height but no duration. Is such a thing possible? It is, but only hypothetically. For in fact, the point, line and plane do not truly exist as such. Any line that can be seen has breadth as well as length (and duration), just as any physical plane has a certain thickness as well as length and breadth. What movement, then, must a figure of three dimensions undergo to produce a body of four dimensions? We moved a plane in the dimension of height to produce a cube, so the movement of a (hypothetical) cube in the dimension of time should produce a (real) figure of four dimensions. What does movement in the dimension of time mean? As we said, it must mean movement in a new direction, not up, down or sideways. Are there any other kinds of movement? For a start, there is the movement that the Earths rotation imparts to everything upon it and that puts even apparently motionless bodies in motion. Thus, we may say that the cross section of a real body, whose fourth dimension is duration, is inseparable from the motion that the turning world inevitably imparts to everything. Further, inevitable motions are that of the Earth around the Sun, of the Sun around the centre of the galaxy, and, perhaps, of the galaxy itself around some unknown point. Since any perceptible body is, in fact, undergoing all these motions simultaneously, we can say that it is ordinarily imperceptible. Because, motions and the dimensions, they imply, are only perceptible in a framework of time, they can be referred to as dimensions of time. If duration is one aspect of time, what might the others be? Among several possibilities, we can suggest appearance and disappearance, change and recurrence. Of all possibilities, only duration is perceptible. When we say that something is perceptible, we mean that we suddenly note its existence, when something disappears we note its lack of existence. We perceive no intermediate condition of appearing or disappearing. In the same way, we talk of change, but actually only develop the concept, as we perceive aggregates of characteristics that exist or cease to exist. And so we infer, but do not observe, the recurrence of sunset and sunrise, the passage of seasons, the growth of a child. And yet, things really do appear and disappear, change and recur, although not actually perceived to do so. They are, so to speak, hypothetical to us and must have their reality in other dimensions of time, just as the hypothetical three-dimensional body becomes real, that is, perceptible, in the dimension of time we call duration. If access to higher dimensions of time belongs to one body, it is at least theoretically possible that it belongs, though invisibly, to all bodies. We can further assume that such access is by way of unfamiliar modes or levels of consciousness – and that the name we give to one of these is prophecy. Q. To understand the dimensions of time, we have to

View answer

Read the passages carefully and answer the questions that follow :Time has many dimensions, is a concept often advanced to account for certain inexplicable happenings. The gist of the idea is that time - which seems to unfold in a linear way, with the past coming before the present and the present before the future - might, in another dimension, not be experienced sequentially. The past, present and future could exist simultaneously.The concept that there are unfamiliar dimensions of time is most easily approached by way of those dimensions with which we are already familiar, those of length, height and breadth. These, in turn, are best approached, quite literally, from a starting point, which, geometrically speaking, has a location but no dimensions. It does, however, relate to figures with dimensions in the following way: If a point is moved through space, it marks a line, with the one dimension of length. If a line is moved through space, it traces the figure of a plane with the two dimensions of length and breadth. And, if a plane is moved in space, it traces a figure with the three dimensions of length, breadth and height.We can also work backward to form a three-dimensional body and find that the cross section of the three-dimensional cube is a two-dimensional plane, the cross section of the two-dimensional plane is a one-dimensional line and that the cross section of the line is a dimensionless point. From this, we can infer that a body of three dimensions is the cross section of a body, when moved in a certain way, of four dimensions. Then comes the question, of what sort of body could a three-dimensional shape be the cross section? And, in what sort of new direction could a three-dimensional shape be moved to produce one of four dimensions, since a movement other than up and down, backward and forward or side to side would simply produce a larger figure, not one of a different dimension. The answer, of course, is the feature duration. For, as soon as something ceases to endure, it ceases to exit. To the three familiar dimensions, then, we should add duration in time as a fourth dimension. Ordinary, three-dimensional bodies should, therefore, be properly described as having only length, breadth and height but no duration. Is such a thing possible? It is, but only hypothetically. For in fact, the point, line and plane do not truly exist as such. Any line that can be seen has breadth as well as length (and duration), just as any physical plane has a certain thickness as well as length and breadth. What movement, then, must a figure of three dimensions undergo to produce a body of four dimensions?We moved a plane in the dimension of height to produce a cube, so the movement of a (hypothetical) cube in the dimension of time should produce a (real) figure of four dimensions. What does movement in the dimension of time mean? As we said, it must mean movement in a new direction, not up, down or sideways. Are there any other kinds of movement? For a start, there is the movement that the Earths rotation imparts to everything upon it and that puts even apparently motionless bodies in motion. Thus, we may say that the cross section of a real body, whose fourth dimension is duration, is inseparable from the motion that the turning world inevitably imparts to everything. Further, inevitable motions are that of the Earth around the Sun, of the Sun around the centre of the galaxy, and, perhaps, of the galaxy itself around some unknown point. Since any perceptible body is, in fact, undergoing all these motions simultaneously, we can say that it is ordinarily imperceptible. Because, motions and the dimensions, they imply, are only perceptible in a framework of time, they can be referred to as dimensions of time.If duration is one aspect of time, what might the others be? Among several possibilities, we can suggest appearance and disappearance, change and recurrence. Of all possibilities, only duration is perceptible. When we say that something is perceptible, we mean that we suddenly note its existence, when something disappears we note its lack of existence. We perceive no intermediate condition of appearing or disappearing. In the same way, we talk of change, but actually only develop the concept, as we perceive aggregates of characteristics that exist or cease to exist. And so we infer, but do not observe, the recurrence of sunset and sunrise, the passage of seasons, the growth of a child. And yet, things really do appear and disappear, change and recur, although not actually perceived to do so. They are, so to speak, hypothetical to us and must have their reality in other dimensions of time, just as the hypothetical three-dimensional body becomes real, that is, perceptible, in the dimension of time we call duration.If access to higher dimensions of time belongs to one body, it is at least theoretically possible that it belongs, though invisibly, to all bodies. We can further assume that such access is by way of unfamiliar modes or levels of consciousness – and that the name we give to one of these is prophecy.Q. As per the passage, it is not possible to have a true line.

View answer

InstructionsFor the following questions answer them individuallyThe passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Production and legitimation of scientific knowledge can be approached from a number of perspectives. To study knowledge production from the sociology of professions perspective would mean a focus on the institutionalization of a body of knowledge. The professions-approach informed earlier research on managerial occupation, business schools and management knowledge. It however tends to reify institutional power structures in its understanding of the links between knowledge and authority.Knowledge production is restricted in the perspective to the selected members of the professional community, most notably to the university faculties and professional colleges. Power is understood as a negative mechanism, which prevents the non-professional actors from offering their ideas and information as legitimate knowledge.

View answer

Top Courses for CATView all

Quantitative Aptitude (Quant)

CAT Mock Test Series 2025

Crash Course for CAT

Mock Test Series for SNAP

Mock Test Series for XAT

Top Courses for CAT

View all

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.The Labour Party’s troubles in Englandare not isolated. Across Europe, the mainstream left’s old electoral coalition - spanning industrial workers, public sector employees and urban professionals - is fragmenting as class-based identities give way to multi-dimensional ones. Its more socially conservative components are turning to the centre- and far-right. Its progressive and radical ones are turning to liberals, greens and other left-wing parties. Where social democracy was the dominant force in much of the continent around the turn of the millennium, now it holds power only in a disparate handful of countries. It is to those places, where left-of-centre parties bombarded by many of those same changes nonetheless manage to wield power, that a despairing left may well now look.a)The repudiation of leftist ideals by many of its traditional support groups has led to the decline of the mainstream left, and hence social democracy, in Europe.b)The mainstream left and hence social democracy has waned in popularity across Europe due to a political divide within its traditional support groups.c)Change in political affiliations among its traditional supporters has led to the global decline of the mainstream left and the democracy advocated by it.d)The mainstream left has grown weaker across Europe due to the growing influence of new-age political ideals on its traditional support groups.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.

Explore Courses for CAT exam