All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >  The twelfth century witnessed the emergence o... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?
  • a)
    It emerged in Kerala.
  • b)
    It was led by a Basavanna.
  • c)
    Their followers were known Nayanars.
  • d)
    They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Viras...
The sect is generally regarded in South Indian oral tradition as having been founded by Basavanna.
The Virashaiva tradition in Karnataka: They worship Shiva in his manifestation as a linga, and men usually wear a small linga in a silver case on a loop strung over the left shoulder.
Lingayats believe that on death the devotee will be united with Shiva and will not return to this world.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Viras...
The correct answer is option B) It was led by Basavanna.



Explanation:



The Virashaiva tradition emerged in the twelfth century and continues to be an important community in the region to date. This tradition was led by a prominent philosopher and social reformer named Basavanna. Basavanna was a Kannada poet and a key figure in the development of the Virashaiva movement.

Key Points:

- The Emergence of the Virashaiva Tradition: The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of the Virashaiva tradition. This movement was a social and religious reform movement that aimed to challenge the existing social hierarchy and caste system prevalent in society.

- Basavanna: Basavanna was the main leader and founder of the Virashaiva movement. He was born into a Brahmin family but challenged the caste system and advocated for equality and social justice. Basavanna emphasized the importance of spiritual experience over ritualistic practices and rejected the notion of caste-based discrimination.

- Vachanas: Our understanding of the Virashaiva tradition comes from the vachanas composed by the women and men who joined the movement. Vachanas are devotional poetry written in the Kannada language. They express the spiritual experiences, social critique, and philosophical ideas of the Virashaivas.

- Views and Beliefs: The Virashaivas rejected the idea of caste and believed in the equality of all individuals. They emphasized the importance of personal and direct experience of the divine. They advocated for social reform, gender equality, and rejected the notion of untouchability. The Virashaivas also challenged the priestly class and emphasized the idea of a direct relationship with God.

In conclusion, the Virashaiva tradition emerged in the twelfth century and was led by Basavanna. This movement aimed to challenge the caste system and promote social equality and justice. Our understanding of this tradition comes from the vachanas composed by the followers of the movement.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. Which of the following did not hail the 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change as a failure?

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. What is the meaning of the term innuendo as used in the passage?

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. Why has the author held countries responsible for the failure of COP25?

While the rhetoric of collective responsibility to achieve "ambitious outcomes" in terms of climate action to address the "climate emergency" stands questioned in the 25th Conference of Parties, the grim realities of the inequalities between countries and the evasion of responsibilities and commitments by the developed countries point towards the fundamental role and continued importance of the United Nations FrameworkConvention on Climate Change that remains wider in its scope and broader in its vision than the Paris Agreement.The developed countries are also seeking to manipulate the science policy interface in an attempt to sideline the equity and climate justice-related perspectives of the developing countries.The 25th Conference of Parties of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, the annual climate summit of the countries that are signatories to the Convention, recently concluded at Madrid in December 2019. Instead of being hailed as a milestone, almost universally, it has been held to be a failure. A remarkable range of opinions appears to concur on this view, from the United Nations Secretary General to a number of governments, including the European Union and some of the small island states, and a range of nongovernmental organizations, including some of the biggest international players.Referring to the year-long wave of public action preceding COP25, especially by students and youth in the developed countries, this narrative of failure has held all countries responsible for the lack of "ambitious" outcomes adequate to dealing with the "climate emergency." While some accounts have justifiably noted the role of the United States in the overall outcome, others have also targeted Brazil, and China, and even India by innuendo. This narrative of collective responsibility for the outcome has dominated the global media too and has been uncritically echoed in the national media in countries like India.But if COP25 was indeed the failure it is perhaps justifiably held to be, why indeed did it fail and what precisely was the anatomy of the failure? Despite the incessant rhetoric of "ambition" to face the "climate emergency," why indeed were the outcomes so meagre, and where does the responsibility lie?Unfortunately, the understanding of the challenge of global warming has been made considerably more difficult by the widespread tendency to ignore the reality of the grossly unequal world in which we live. The UNFCCC recognizes this in its explicit articulation of the principles of equity and common but differentiated responsibilities as the basis for climate action, and thus, calls on the developed countries to take the lead. However, all too often the argument is made that these principles and their implementation in the differentiation between developed and developing countries in climate action has somehow become outdated.Q. With reference to the passage, what is the meaning of the term signatories?

The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The twelfth century witnessed the emergence of a new movement as Virashaiva tradition. This continues to be an important community in the region to date. Our understanding of this tradition is derived from vachanas composed of women and men who joined the movement. Which of the following statement is correct about this tradition?a)It emerged in Kerala.b)It was led by a Basavanna.c)Their followers were known Nayanars.d)They supported the idea of caste and theory of rebirth.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup