All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  The passage given below is followed by four s... Start Learning for Free
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.
Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.
  • a)
    Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.
  • b)
    Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.
  • c)
    Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality. 
  • d)
    Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your CAT doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the opti...
In the passage, the author touches upon the survival of the fittest mentality and certain traits associated with it. But humans, being social species, behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality at times, as they are also concerned about the survival of their group. The main point of the author here is that humans consider the survival of their group important too, which results in behaviour that seems counterintuitive.
Option A can be eliminated. The passage does not talk about improving individual survival.
The author does not assert that humans prioritize group survival over individual survival. The comparison between the importance of the two has not been done. Hence, option C is wrong.
Option D is out of scope. The comparative performance of groups has not been discussed in the passage. 
Option B captures the idea elucidated above. Option B is the answer.
Community Answer
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the opti...
Understanding the Summary Choice
The choice of option 'B' as the best summary reflects the author's nuanced view of human behavior in relation to Darwin's theory of evolution.
Clarification of the Author's Position
- The author acknowledges the concept of "survival of the fittest," which traditionally emphasizes traits that enhance individual survival.
- However, the author introduces the idea that human behavior often contradicts this notion, indicating a more complex understanding of survival.
Key Points Highlighted in the Passage
- Humans are inherently social creatures, which influences their behavior beyond mere individual survival.
- The concept of "indirect reciprocity" is introduced, showcasing that humans often engage in altruistic behaviors that do not provide immediate personal benefits.
Why Option 'B' is Correct
- Option 'B' captures the essence of this complexity by stating that besides behaviors aimed at ensuring individual survival, humans display counter-intuitive actions that can be understood through their social nature.
- It emphasizes the dual aspect of human behavior: the instinct for self-preservation coupled with social cooperation.
Contrasting Other Options
- Option 'A' implies a direct benefit from helping others, which is not the author's focus.
- Option 'C' suggests a prioritization of group survival over individual survival, which is too strong a claim based on the passage.
- Option 'D' introduces the idea of diversity in strengths but does not address the social aspect that is central to the author's argument.
Conclusion
In summary, option 'B' best encapsulates the author's argument about the intricate balance between individual and social behaviors in humans, making it the most fitting choice.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Scientists recently declared that the evidence is compelling enough to say that humanitys impact on the Earths atmosphere, oceans and wildlife has pushed the world into the new epoch.Britain is a world leader on the environment and has played a pivotal role in the European Union on this issue since 1986, when Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act, which established the EUs competence in this area. Yet the impact that leaving the EU would have on the UKs environmental standards rarely features in discussions. The evidence so far is clear: families in Britain, rivers, beaches and special places would pay the price if UK voted to leave.In 1995, under the last Conservative government, the UK was dirty man of Europe. Some 83% of the household waste went to landfill and just 7% was recycled or composted. By 2014, thanks to a series of EU directives, the UKs recycling rate had reached 45%.The UK currently recycles 90% of construction materials, well ahead of other countries. The Birds and Habitats Directives enabled bird and carnivore species to recover. The Natura 2000 Directive obliges the UK government to provide protected nature zones. Renewable energy capacity is growing, thanks to national targets set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive. In 2013, 15% of electricity produced in the UK came from renewable sources. Not only is the carbon footprint shrinking, it has created opportunities for renewable energy companies to grow. EU environmental legislation allows the phasing out of inefficient lightbulbs on an EU-wide basis. Also, higher standards on new car efficiency help lower fuel costs. Such strong regulations allow monitoring of environmental standards and tracking deviations. All this progress is at risk if the UK votes to leave. Anyone who thinks the environment will be better off if UK left the EU should take a long hard look at the Tory record.The Tories have talked green but acted blue.The Chinese and Indian governments have invited the European commission to help them to clean up their water and air. The EU now has global expertise in the environment. The evidence is clear. The EU has more influence globally with the UK as a member. Andas a member, UK has more influence globally. UKs voice in the Paris climate change talks was amplified because it is a part of a club of 28 countries. Leaving would mean implementing EU environment law without a seat at the table and a vote in decisions. When the UK can lead from the inside, why would it walk away? Ensuring the UK has a cleaner, greener future relies on the EU membership. Anyone who argues otherwise will be on the wrong side of history.Q.Paragraph 1 talks about humanitys impact in pushing the word ina new era. Which word best describes this time period?

Scientists recently declared that the evidence is compelling enough to say that humanitys impact on the Earths atmosphere, oceans and wildlife has pushed the world into the new epoch.Britain is a world leader on the environment and has played a pivotal role in the European Union on this issue since 1986, when Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act, which established the EUs competence in this area. Yet the impact that leaving the EU would have on the UKs environmental standards rarely features in discussions. The evidence so far is clear: families in Britain, rivers, beaches and special places would pay the price if UK voted to leave.In 1995, under the last Conservative government, the UK was dirty man of Europe. Some 83% of the household waste went to landfill and just 7% was recycled or composted. By 2014, thanks to a series of EU directives, the UKs recycling rate had reached 45%.The UK currently recycles 90% of construction materials, well ahead of other countries. The Birds and Habitats Directives enabled bird and carnivore species to recover. The Natura 2000 Directive obliges the UK government to provide protected nature zones. Renewable energy capacity is growing, thanks to national targets set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive. In 2013, 15% of electricity produced in the UK came from renewable sources. Not only is the carbon footprint shrinking, it has created opportunities for renewable energy companies to grow. EU environmental legislation allows the phasing out of inefficient lightbulbs on an EU-wide basis. Also, higher standards on new car efficiency help lower fuel costs. Such strong regulations allow monitoring of environmental standards and tracking deviations. All this progress is at risk if the UK votes to leave. Anyone who thinks the environment will be better off if UK left the EU should take a long hard look at the Tory record.The Tories have talked green but acted blue.The Chinese and Indian governments have invited the European commission to help them to clean up their water and air. The EU now has global expertise in the environment. The evidence is clear. The EU has more influence globally with the UK as a member. Andas a member, UK has more influence globally. UKs voice in the Paris climate change talks was amplified because it is a part of a club of 28 countries. Leaving would mean implementing EU environment law without a seat at the table and a vote in decisions. When the UK can lead from the inside, why would it walk away? Ensuring the UK has a cleaner, greener future relies on the EU membership. Anyone who argues otherwise will be on the wrong side of history.Q.The tone of the author can best be said to be ______.

Scientists recently declared that the evidence is compelling enough to say that humanitys impact on the Earths atmosphere, oceans and wildlife has pushed the world into the new epoch.Britain is a world leader on the environment and has played a pivotal role in the European Union on this issue since 1986, when Margaret Thatcher signed the Single European Act, which established the EUs competence in this area. Yet the impact that leaving the EU would have on the UKs environmental standards rarely features in discussions. The evidence so far is clear: families in Britain, rivers, beaches and special places would pay the price if UK voted to leave.In 1995, under the last Conservative government, the UK was dirty man of Europe. Some 83% of the household waste went to landfill and just 7% was recycled or composted. By 2014, thanks to a series of EU directives, the UKs recycling rate had reached 45%.The UK currently recycles 90% of construction materials, well ahead of other countries. The Birds and Habitats Directives enabled bird and carnivore species to recover. The Natura 2000 Directive obliges the UK government to provide protected nature zones. Renewable energy capacity is growing, thanks to national targets set by the EU Renewable Energy Directive. In 2013, 15% of electricity produced in the UK came from renewable sources. Not only is the carbon footprint shrinking, it has created opportunities for renewable energy companies to grow. EU environmental legislation allows the phasing out of inefficient lightbulbs on an EU-wide basis. Also, higher standards on new car efficiency help lower fuel costs. Such strong regulations allow monitoring of environmental standards and tracking deviations. All this progress is at risk if the UK votes to leave. Anyone who thinks the environment will be better off if UK left the EU should take a long hard look at the Tory record.The Tories have talked green but acted blue.The Chinese and Indian governments have invited the European commission to help them to clean up their water and air. The EU now has global expertise in the environment. The evidence is clear. The EU has more influence globally with the UK as a member. Andas a member, UK has more influence globally. UKs voice in the Paris climate change talks was amplified because it is a part of a club of 28 countries. Leaving would mean implementing EU environment law without a seat at the table and a vote in decisions. When the UK can lead from the inside, why would it walk away? Ensuring the UK has a cleaner, greener future relies on the EU membership. Anyone who argues otherwise will be on the wrong side of history.Q.What are the problems that the EU has not helped UK tackle?

Answer the following question based on the information given below.Animals can habituate to environmental disturbances. Whats more, they can get very good at telling the difference between stimuli that are relevant to them, and those that arent. Tree frogs can tell the difference between vibration caused by a predator and vibration caused by rain, even though these cues are extremely similar. Similarly, caterpillars living on leaves can tell the difference between vibrations caused by other caterpillars, predators, wind and rain.Spiders build webs on human-built structures such as pipelines, fences, road signs and wire rods, all of which are made out of materials not present in their evolutionary history. This means that they will absorb vibrations from the environment differently to a more natural place a spider might build its web, for example a plant. If these human-built objects are anywhere near humans (which they are likely to b e) they are also probably affected by human noise. For example, a spider that has built a web near a road will be subject to the vibration caused by cars driving by. This matters particularly to spiders because they use vibration so much in guiding their behaviour. Indeed, you can even imagine the web to be an extension of the spider itself, such that the vibrations on the very outside of the web travel down to the spider situated in the centre and tell it whether its being touched by prey, a mate, wind or rain.Q.Which of these statements is supported by the passage?

DIRECTION for the question:Read the passage and answer the question based on it.Demography of organizations, also called population ecology is an interesting field. It proposes that organisational mortality processes depend upon the age and size of the organizations, as well as on characteristics of populations and environments. Moreover, there is evidence of an imprinting process – meaning that environmental conditions at certain early phases in an organisation’s development have long-term consequence. In particular, organizations subject to intense competition have elevated mortality hazards at all ages. A central theme is structural inertia, the tendency for organizations to respond slowly relative to the speed of environmental change. A central argument holds that the inertia derives from the very characteristics that make organizations favoured actors in modern society in terms of reliability and (formal) accountability. It follows that changes in an organisation’s core features are disruptive and increase mortality hazards, at least in the short-run. Research on this subject tends to support this view. The concept of niche provides a framework for relating environmental variations and competition to population dynamics and segmentation. Much empirical work examines the niches of organisational populations in terms of dimensions of social, political, and economic environments. Most research in this field builds on theories of resource partition and of density dependence. Resource-partitioning theory concerns the relationship between increasing market concentration and increasing proliferation of specialists in mature industries. The key implication of this theory concerns the effects of concentration on the viability of specialist organizations (those that seek to exploit a narrow range of resources). The theory of density-dependent organisational evolution synthesizes ecological and institutional processes. It holds that growth in the number of organizations in a population (density) drives processes of social legitimatization and competition that, in turn, shape the vital rates.Q.Most top-notch business consultants recommend changing the entire configuration of an organisation’s strategy, structure and systems. If the ideas contained in the passage are agreed to, then such a recommendation

Top Courses for CATView all

Top Courses for CAT

The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The passage given below is followed by four summaries. Choose the option that best captures the author’s position.Taken from Darwin’s theory of evolution, survival of the fittest is often conceptualized as the advantage that accrues with certain traits, allowing an individual to both thrive and survive in their environment by out-competing for limited resources. Qualities such as strength and speed were beneficial to our ancestors, allowing them to survive in demanding environments, and thus our general admiration for these qualities is now understood through this evolutionary lens. Humans, however, also display a wide range of behavior that seems counter-intuitive to the survival of the fittest mentality until you consider that we are an inherently social species, and that keeping our group fit is a wise investment of our time and energy. One of the behaviors that humans display a lot of is “indirect reciprocity”. Distinguished from “direct reciprocity”, in which I help you and you help me, indirect reciprocity confers no immediate benefit to the one doing the helping.a)Humans who have the fittest traits help the less advantageous ones in their group to improve their individual survival.b)Other than the behaviour ensuring their individual survival, Humans also display certain counter-intuitive behaviour that can be explained considering they are a social species.c)Humans prioritize group survival over individual survival, which explains why they often behave in a way that defies the survival of the fittest mentality.d)Groups survive better if they have individuals with different strengths to draw on.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup