Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >  THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF ... Start Learning for Free
THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief?
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

The first thing to know when talking about privacy in India is that a majority of the population does not always understand what it means. It is at times confused with shame. Its also confused with the emotion we feel when we do something that does not meet our standards or our sense of what is right. Modern Indian languages do not seem to have an exact word which captures the meaning of privacy; theyre usually some variation of the words for isolation, intimacy or secrecy, once again hinting at a conceptual confusion.Privacy, however, is not only about hiding something or keeping it secret. It is, at its core, the right to be left alone. It doesnt mean that one is withdrawing from society. It is an expectation that society will not interfere in the choices made by the person so long as they do not cause harm to others. It means that ones right to eat whatever one chooses, the right to drink what one chooses, the right to love and marry whom one chooses, to wear what one chooses, among others, are rights which the state cannot interfere with. It is natural that the very concept of privacy seems incomprehensible. If you have grown up in a society where everything you do is dictated by someone else, and the cost of disobedience is high, to have the freedom to choose what you will in such important matters sounds like fantasy. But it is also a common misconception that the non-well-off in India do not know or care about privacy.Millions of men and women push back daily against the oppressive hold of their families and communities, and fight for the freedom to make their own choices. They may not have the right word for it, but they are creating space for themselves to exercise the right to privacy.It is in this context that one must understand the hearings in the Supreme Court on the right to privacy. Although the nine-judge bench has decided there is a fundamental right to privacy protected under the Constitution in the specific context of the Aadhaar case, privacy has many more dimensions than just data protection or surveillance by the state. A fundamental right to privacy, enshrined and protected in the Constitution, would mean that all persons have the right to be left alone by the state unless such intrusion is necessitated by a just, reasonable, and fair law. The implications of the judgment will go far beyond just the Aadhaar scheme and law. The law laid down by the Supreme Court on privacy could affect the course of development of the law governing reproductive rights, gay rights, beef bans, prohibition, among a host of other issues that the Indian state and society are grappling with.Q. In the Parliament, private member legislation is passed seeking to curb the Rights of Civil Societies to draft a law. Civil Societies challenged the law arguing the violation of speech, expression, privacy and other constitutional rights. Based on the authors view above will the right to define and draft laws be saved under the Privacy rights?

The first thing to know when talking about privacy in India is that a majority of the population does not always understand what it means. It is at times confused with shame. Its also confused with the emotion we feel when we do something that does not meet our standards or our sense of what is right. Modern Indian languages do not seem to have an exact word which captures the meaning of privacy; theyre usually some variation of the words for isolation, intimacy or secrecy, once again hinting at a conceptual confusion.Privacy, however, is not only about hiding something or keeping it secret. It is, at its core, the right to be left alone. It doesnt mean that one is withdrawing from society. It is an expectation that society will not interfere in the choices made by the person so long as they do not cause harm to others. It means that ones right to eat whatever one chooses, the right to drink what one chooses, the right to love and marry whom one chooses, to wear what one chooses, among others, are rights which the state cannot interfere with. It is natural that the very concept of privacy seems incomprehensible. If you have grown up in a society where everything you do is dictated by someone else, and the cost of disobedience is high, to have the freedom to choose what you will in such important matters sounds like fantasy. But it is also a common misconception that the non-well-off in India do not know or care about privacy.Millions of men and women push back daily against the oppressive hold of their families and communities, and fight for the freedom to make their own choices. They may not have the right word for it, but they are creating space for themselves to exercise the right to privacy.It is in this context that one must understand the hearings in the Supreme Court on the right to privacy. Although the nine-judge bench has decided there is a fundamental right to privacy protected under the Constitution in the specific context of the Aadhaar case, privacy has many more dimensions than just data protection or surveillance by the state. A fundamental right to privacy, enshrined and protected in the Constitution, would mean that all persons have the right to be left alone by the state unless such intrusion is necessitated by a just, reasonable, and fair law. The implications of the judgment will go far beyond just the Aadhaar scheme and law. The law laid down by the Supreme Court on privacy could affect the course of development of the law governing reproductive rights, gay rights, beef bans, prohibition, among a host of other issues that the Indian state and society are grappling with.Q. Auto Shanker was conv icted of six murders and sentenced to death. While in jail, Shanker wrote his auto-biography and expressed his wish that this be published in the Blitz magazine. Before publishing the autobiography, Blitz announced the publication.Prison officials then forced Shanker to write to the magazine requesting that the auto-biography not be published. Blitz then brought the action to prevent the Prison officials from violating the magazines and the prisoners Freedom of Expression. In such a case, based on the authors reasoning, which will be the best option to strike the balance between the freedom of press vis-A-vis the right to privacy of the citizens.

The first thing to know when talking about privacy in India is that a majority of the population does not always understand what it means. It is at times confused with shame. Its also confused with the emotion we feel when we do something that does not meet our standards or our sense of what is right. Modern Indian languages do not seem to have an exact word which captures the meaning of privacy; theyre usually some variation of the words for isolation, intimacy or secrecy, once again hinting at a conceptual confusion.Privacy, however, is not only about hiding something or keeping it secret. It is, at its core, the right to be left alone. It doesnt mean that one is withdrawing from society. It is an expectation that society will not interfere in the choices made by the person so long as they do not cause harm to others. It means that ones right to eat whatever one chooses, the right to drink what one chooses, the right to love and marry whom one chooses, to wear what one chooses, among others, are rights which the state cannot interfere with. It is natural that the very concept of privacy seems incomprehensible. If you have grown up in a society where everything you do is dictated by someone else, and the cost of disobedience is high, to have the freedom to choose what you will in such important matters sounds like fantasy. But it is also a common misconception that the non-well-off in India do not know or care about privacy.Millions of men and women push back daily against the oppressive hold of their families and communities, and fight for the freedom to make their own choices. They may not have the right word for it, but they are creating space for themselves to exercise the right to privacy.It is in this context that one must understand the hearings in the Supreme Court on the right to privacy. Although the nine-judge bench has decided there is a fundamental right to privacy protected under the Constitution in the specific context of the Aadhaar case, privacy has many more dimensions than just data protection or surveillance by the state. A fundamental right to privacy, enshrined and protected in the Constitution, would mean that all persons have the right to be left alone by the state unless such intrusion is necessitated by a just, reasonable, and fair law. The implications of the judgment will go far beyond just the Aadhaar scheme and law. The law laid down by the Supreme Court on privacy could affect the course of development of the law governing reproductive rights, gay rights, beef bans, prohibition, among a host of other issues that the Indian state and society are grappling with.Q. On a particular day, three escaped convicts intruded into the house of James Hill and held him and members of his family hostage for nineteen hours, whereafter they released them unharmed. The incident became prime news in the local newspapers and the members of the press started swarming the Hills home. Unable to stop the siege of the press correspondents, the family shifted to a far-away place. Life magazine sent its men to the former home of Hill family where they reenacted the entire incident, and photographed it, showing inter alia that the members of the family were ill-treated by the intruders. When Life published the story, Hill brought a suit against Life magazine, for invasion of his privacy. In such a case, based on the authors reasoning, which will be the best option to safeguard the privacy of Hills family as well as the Right to Speech of the Press?

THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief?
Question Description
THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief?.
Solutions for THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief?, a detailed solution for THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? has been provided alongside types of THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice THE WAY YOU TREAT OTHERS ALWAYS HAS A WAY OF COMING BACK TO YOU. This is right or wrong? Give me answer in brief? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev