The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word andquot;secularandquot; was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > The polity assured to the people of India by ...

Join the Discussion on the App

The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.

Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.
Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modu's appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the author's arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?

a)
Gondu's petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.
b)
Gondu' spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.
c)
Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.
d)
Gondu's challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Languages: Mock Test - 9

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is descr...

Correct Answer is (a) Police department is guilty of murder. This was a cold blooded murder committed with a prior concert and design.

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Article 30 says "All minorities shall have the right to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice." The protection granted to Minority Educational Institutions to admit students of their choice is subject to reasonable restrictions. Holy Mary Institute, an educational minority institution was granted the status of "Christian Minority Educational Institution". Recently, Holy Land Govt. made a law mandating the Secondary School Certificates or Transfer Certificates (T.C.) from the school from which they have studied shall be the basis for the purpose of determining the minority status of candidates. Holy Mary Institute challenged the law on the ground that is an intrusion on the right to administer the minority institutions conferred by Article 30(1).Based on the principle of law and information set out in the given passage, choose the most appropriate choice

View answer

The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Parliament can amend the constitution of India or any law without violating the Basic Structure of constitution of India. Basic Structure of the constitution of India consists of its essential features such as democracy, secularism, judicial review etc.The Parliament has decided to pass a constitutional amendment act to abolish the religions in India.Following the amendment, all the religion will be derecognized by the State and Central Government.Based on the authors arguments and given principle of law, decide the validity of the amendment?

View answer

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. The main purpose of the passage is to

View answer

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. All of the following can be inferred from the passage except.

View answer

The Writ Jurisdiction of Supreme Court can be invoked under Article 32 of the Constitution for the violation of fundamental rights guaranteed under Part – III of the Constitution. Any provision in any Constitution for Fundamental Rights is meaningless unless there are adequate safeguards to ensure enforcement of such provisions. Since the reality of such rights is tested only through the judiciary, the safeguards assume even more importance. In addition, enforcement also depends upon the degree of independence of the Judiciary and the availability of relevant instruments with the executive authority. Indian Constitution, like most of Western Constitutions, lays down certain provisions to ensure the enforcement of Fundamental Rights.However, Article 32 is referred to as the “Constitutional Remedy” for enforcement of Fundamental Rights. This provision itself has been included in the Fundamental Rights and hence it cannot be denied to any person. Dr. B. R. Ambedkar described Article 32 as the most important one, without which the Constitution would be reduced to nullity. It is also referred to as the heart and soul of the Constitution. By including Article 32 in the Fundamental Rights, the Supreme Court has been made the protector and guarantor of these Rights. An application made under Article 32 of the Constitution before the Supreme Court, cannot be refused on technical grounds. In addition to the prescribed five types of writs, the Supreme Court may pass any other appropriate order. Moreover, only the questions pertaining to the Fundamental Rights can be determined in proceedings against Article 32. Under Article 32, the Supreme Court may issue a Writ against any person or government within the territory of India. Where the infringement of a Fundamental Right has been established, the Supreme Court cannot refuse relief on the ground that the aggrieved person may have remedy before some other court or under the ordinary law.The relief can also not be denied on the ground that the disputed facts have to be investigated or some evidence has to be collected. Even if an aggrieved person has not asked for a particular Writ, the Supreme Court, after considering the facts and circumstances, may grant the appropriate Writ and may even modify it to suit the exigencies of the case. Normally, only the aggrieved person is allowed to move the Court. But it has been held by the Supreme Court that in social or public interest matters, any one may move the Court. A Public Interest Litigation can be filed before the Supreme Court under Article 32 of the Constitution or before the High Court of a State under Article 226 of the Constitution under their respective Writ Jurisdictions.Q. According to the passage, article 32 has which of the following characteristics?A. it is used for enforcement of fundamental rights.B. The Supreme Court may issue a writ against any person or government of India.C. Article 32 defines a fundamental right.

View answer

The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The polity assured to the people of India by the Constitution is described in the Preamble wherein the word "secular" was added by the 42nd Amendment. It highlights the fundamental rights guaranteed in Articles 25 to 28 that the State shall have no religion of its own and all persons shall be equally entitled to freedom of conscience and the right freely to profess, practise and propagate religion of their own choice, in brief, this is the concept of secularism as a basic feature of the Constitution of India and the way of life adopted by the people of India as their abiding faith and creed. M.C. Setalvad in Patel Memorial Lectures - 1985, on Secularism, referring to the Indian concept of secularism, stated thus:The ideal, therefore, of a secular State in the sense of a State which treats all religions alike and displays benevolent neutrality towards them is in a way more suited to the Indian environment and climate than that of a truly secular State. Secularism, in the Indian context, must be given the widest possible content. It should connote the eradication of all attitudes and practices derived from or connected with religion which impede our development and retard our growth into an integrated nation The concept of secularism is very much embedded in our constitutional philosophy.Secularism is thus more than a passive attitude of religious tolerance. It is a positive concept of equal treatment of all religions. The State has no religion. The State is bound to honour and to wield the scales even between all religions. It may not advance the cause of one religion to the detriment of another. Thus, only concerted and earnest endeavour, both by the State and citizen, towards secularisation lead to the stabilisation of our democratic state and the establishment of a true and cohesive Indian nationhood.Q. Modu is an ardent follower of a religion followed by the majority population in the country. Moduis elected with a landslide victory in the general elections.Gondu, his political opponent belongs to a minority religion in the country. Gondu challenges Modus appointment. Basic premise of the challenge is that election cannot be allowed of a person who follows communal practices, excludes the interests of other religions and remains silent during religious intolerance and lynching. Based on the authors arguments and reasoning of the passage, decide the validity of the petition?a)Gondus petition would not succeed, since there is a need for greater representation of minorities in political office.b)Gondu spetition would not succeed, since secularism does not mean that the state creates a high wall against the religion. Equality is the norm, discrimination is violation.c)Modu would be disqualified from being appointed as Prime Minister, since secularism ensures tolerance and equality of religions.d)Gondus challenge would succeed, since secularism requires that only irreligious individuals are appointed as the head of the state.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam