You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Class 12 Exam > Class 12 Questions > You have been appointed as the Chief Secretar...

Join the Discussion on the App

a)
ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.
b)
talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.
c)
educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.
d)
ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

General Tests: Mock Test - 10

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nucl...

Option b is the best way to go ahead as it will ally the apprehensions of the locals and pacify them.

Option c is the next best option as educating the people in the area and clarifying their misconceptions regarding the nuclear power plants will help to ensure that such protests do not recur in the future. But it will take a lot of time, so next best to option b. Option d is incorrect as you cannot ask the government to scrap the project just because it is potentially dangerous for the local people, overlooking the fact that it will benefit many more people by fulfilling the energy needs of the country. Option a is incorrect as using the force to clamp down the protests will be inappropriate as the protesters are not violent.

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Courts ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment."Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trumps strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.But he also called Mr. Trumps proposal "beyond the pale.""To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesnt understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you cant punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesnt seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.Q. Suppose in the US Congress a bill is introduced to expatriate Americans accused and suspected of terrorism as well as burning the flag. This bill was fiercely opposed by the house during its introduction.Based on the authors reasoning, what can be the justification for the opposition

View answer

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Courts ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment."Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trumps strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.But he also called Mr. Trumps proposal "beyond the pale.""To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesnt understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you cant punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesnt seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.Q. Jinkal is a Joint Managing Director of a public limited company. He being in charge of the factory situated at USA was flying National Flag at the office premises of his factory. He was not allowed to do so by the Government officials on the ground that the same is impermissible under the Flag Code. Will the Right to fly the National Flag freely with respect and dignity saved within the meaning of First Amendment. Based on the authors interpretation which of the following is true.

View answer

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Courts ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment."Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trumps strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.But he also called Mr. Trumps proposal "beyond the pale.""To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesnt understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you cant punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesnt seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.Q. Which of the following views can be correctly attributed to the opinion of Mr. Trump regarding the flag burning

View answer

This idea to strip citizenship faded away due to the Supreme Courts ruling. President Donald J. Trump revived the idea to strip the citizenship of Americans accused of terrorism and took it much further than the extreme case of a suspected terrorist. He proposed that Americans who protest government policies by burning the flag could lose their citizenship - meaning, among other things, their right to vote - as punishment."Nobody should be allowed to burn the American flag - if they do, there must be consequences - perhaps loss of citizenship or year in jail", wrote the next President of the free world on a social media site.Trump wrote the post shortly after Fox News aired a segment about a dispute at Hampshire College in Massachusetts, which removed the American flag from its campus flagpole after protests over his election victory; during one demonstration, someone burned a flag.Even if Mr. Trump were to persuade Congress to enact a criminal statute, a dramatic shift in the balance between government power and individual freedom will occur; anyone convicted and sentenced could point to clear Supreme Court precedents to make the case for a constitutional violation.The obstacles include the precedent that the Constitution does not allow the government to expatriate Americans against their will, through a landmark 1967 case, Afroyim v. Rusk. They also include a 1989 decision, Texas v. Johnson, in which the court struck down criminal laws banning flag burning, ruling that the act was a form of political expression protected by the First Amendment.David D. Cole, a Georgetown University law professor who co-wrote the Supreme Court briefs in the flag-burning case and who is about to become national legal director at the American Civil Liberties Union, said he wondered if Mr. Trumps strategy was to goad people into burning flags in order to "marginalize" the protests against him.But he also called Mr. Trumps proposal "beyond the pale.""To me it is deeply troubling that the person who is going to become the most powerful government official in the United States doesnt understand the first thing about the First Amendment - which is you cant punish people for expressing dissent - and also doesnt seem to understand that citizenship is a constitutional right that cannot be taken away, period, under any circumstances," he said.Q. United States established a new vetting measure to keep radical Islamic terrorists out of the United States of America. In pursuance of the same an executive order is signed to remove Americans of Iranian, Syrian, Yemeni and Libyan Origin. If this is true, then, based on the authors reasoning and precedents cited in the passage above, will the order stand the scrutiny of law

View answer

Indias foreign policy is undergoing a series of fundamental transformations in terms of its underlying narratives, processes and desired endgames. There is a conscious and consistent effort to break with the past, no matter how the outcomes might look eventually.What could potentially make this change last longer than initially thought is that Prime Minister Narendra Modi has the mandate, the capability and the willingness to effect major changes and re-conceptualise the countrys external security orientation. And yet, one must ask: Does this really mark a fundamental policy shift, or does it just amount to a slew of optics-friendly acts that are well-choreographed but not visionary?One of the most striking features of the Modi governments foreign policy is its propensity for risk-taking - quite unlike most previous governments, barring perhaps that of Indira Gandhi. Armed with a clear majority, the government is keen to play offensive, undoing the decades-old defensive Indian strategic behaviour. New Delhis actions at Doklam; its surgical strikes against Pakistan in 2016 after the Uri terror attacks; and the Balakot air strikes in the wake of Pulwama attacks this February - notwithstanding the questionable material outcomes in all these cases - are examples of this new-found offensive streak and risktaking tendency.Q. The phrase "break with the past" refers to

View answer

You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2024 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice You have been appointed as the Chief Secretary in a state where a Nuclear Plant has been proposed. People vehemently opposed this project because not much has been done by the government for the victims of nuclear accidents in the past. Now, the onus lies on you to smoothly set up the Nuclear plant as it will help fulfill the urgent energy need of the country. You will- a)ask the security forces in the state to clamp down the protests by the local people using force.b)talk to the representatives of the local protestors and assure them that all the safety measures will be put in place.c)educate all the people in the area about the misconceptions that they have regarding the nuclear plants.d)ask the government to scrap the project as it is potentially dangerous for the local people.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.

Explore Courses for Class 12 exam