All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 12 Exam  >  Class 12 Questions  >  Which Indian state/UT recently passed a &lsqu... Start Learning for Free
Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?
  • a)
    Assam
  • b)
    New Delhi
  • c)
    Rajasthan
  • d)
    Punjab
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Clear all your Class 12 doubts with EduRev
Most Upvoted Answer
Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, ...
The Delhi Cabinet had passed an ambitious Delhi Startup Policy which aims to turn the capital into an international startup hub.
The vision is to enable Delhi to emerge as a “Global Innovation Hub and the most preferred destination for Startups by 2030”. The government intends to encourage, facilitate and support 15,000 startups by 2030. A Startup Policy Monitoring Committee will be formed to oversee the Policy. It will be headed by the Finance Minister of the Delhi Government.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam

Similar Class 12 Doubts

India really cannot handle tension in West Asia right now.That may seem obvious: after all, any escalation in hostilities between Iran and the United States, after the latter killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, will have a huge impact across the region and beyond. Its not for nothing that "World War 3" trended on Twitter on Friday.There are two primary dangers for India, other than the extremely destabilising effects of any outright war in the region.One, there are 8 million Indians living and working in West Asia, the vast majority of whom live in the Arabian Gulf. Conflict would put them all in danger, as it did at the start of the 1990s, when the US went to war with Iraq and New Delhi had to arrange an airlift of more than 110,000 Indian citizens.But even if there isnt all-out conflict, heightened tensions could hurt the economies of the region, and endanger the jobs of many Indians. Already the events of the last few years, including inter-regional conflict between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, employment nationalisation drives in a number of countries and Dubais struggles to recover from economic crisis, have hurt the diaspora.Kerala has already begun coming to terms with the idea that many more will return. A sudden jolt would put pressure on the places Indians return to, and also endanger the $40 billion in remittances India receives from West Asia - more than 50% of all remittances to the country, a key source of foreign exchange.Then there is the question of oil prices. Though international prices have gone up by 4% since the strike on Soleimani, analysts do not currently expect them to get much higher - presuming it is in no ones interests for that to happen and that both the US and Iran will back down from outright conflict.Yet if that presumption is wrong, India will face some difficult times. Although India does not now import much oil from Iran, it is still heavily reliant on the Strait of Hormuz - the tiny span of water through which a quarter of the worlds oil and a third of its natural gas travels. Higher oil prices would automatically mean inflation in India, where analysts are already worried about rising food prices.Even if Indias economy were on a more stable footing, conflict in the region would be dangerous. But the current tensions, coming as they do when the Indian economy seems poised on a precipice, should be even more alarming for policymakers.Q. Which one of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?

India really cannot handle tension in West Asia right now.That may seem obvious: after all, any escalation in hostilities between Iran and the United States, after the latter killed top Iranian military commander Qassem Soleimani, will have a huge impact across the region and beyond. Its not for nothing that "World War 3" trended on Twitter on Friday.There are two primary dangers for India, other than the extremely destabilising effects of any outright war in the region.One, there are 8 million Indians living and working in West Asia, the vast majority of whom live in the Arabian Gulf. Conflict would put them all in danger, as it did at the start of the 1990s, when the US went to war with Iraq and New Delhi had to arrange an airlift of more than 110,000 Indian citizens.But even if there isnt all-out conflict, heightened tensions could hurt the economies of the region, and endanger the jobs of many Indians. Already the events of the last few years, including inter-regional conflict between Saudi Arabia and Qatar, employment nationalisation drives in a number of countries and Dubais struggles to recover from economic crisis, have hurt the diaspora.Kerala has already begun coming to terms with the idea that many more will return. A sudden jolt would put pressure on the places Indians return to, and also endanger the $40 billion in remittances India receives from West Asia - more than 50% of all remittances to the country, a key source of foreign exchange.Then there is the question of oil prices. Though international prices have gone up by 4% since the strike on Soleimani, analysts do not currently expect them to get much higher - presuming it is in no ones interests for that to happen and that both the US and Iran will back down from outright conflict.Yet if that presumption is wrong, India will face some difficult times. Although India does not now import much oil from Iran, it is still heavily reliant on the Strait of Hormuz - the tiny span of water through which a quarter of the worlds oil and a third of its natural gas travels. Higher oil prices would automatically mean inflation in India, where analysts are already worried about rising food prices.Even if Indias economy were on a more stable footing, conflict in the region would be dangerous. But the current tensions, coming as they do when the Indian economy seems poised on a precipice, should be even more alarming for policymakers.Q. Which one of the following best expresses the main idea of the passage?

The world marvels at how well the Indian Constitution has kept a diverse country together for more than 70 years. Its robustness and durability rest on its many built-in safeguards securing citizens rights to freedom and justice and fair play which no government, however powerful, can hope to effectively recast within the space of a single or even multiple tenures in office.Mistakenly, however, this lengthy founding document of the Indian Republic is believed to have been completed solely by the Constituent Assembly, working flat out in just two years, eleven months and 17 days. In fact, the Constitutions long history stretches to over 40 years before its enactment, going all the way back to the Indian Councils Act of 1909. This law, for the first time, brought Indians into governance at central and provincial levels, albeit in a very limited way, through a highly restricted and unrepresentative electorate split on communal lines.The Government of India Act, 1919 was a vast improvement on the Indian Councils Act but remained unrepresentative. It also persisted with communal representation, which had earlier been endorsed by the Congress and the Muslim League through the Lucknow Pact of 1916. In its report submitted in 1930, the Simon Commission, constituted to evaluate the Government of India Act of 1919, recommended much greater Indian involvement in the governance of the country. What followed its report were three extraordinary roundtable conferences - in 1930, 1931 and 1932 - all held in London to see how best Indians could administer their country.Deliberations in these conferences brought out the concerns of different communities, especially the Depressed Classes of which Ambedkar was the de facto leader, and the Muslims led by Muhammad Ali Jinnah.Except the second conference, which Gandhi attended, the other two were boycotted by the Congress. These conferences gave voice to other interest groups too -those representing women and Anglo-Indians, for instance - and led to the passage of the Government of India Act of 1935, much of which found its way into the Constitution.Q. Which of the following was one of the major flaws of the "Government of India Act, 1919"?

Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 12 2025 is part of Class 12 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 12 exam syllabus. Information about Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 12 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 12. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 12 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Which Indian state/UT recently passed a ‘Startup Policy’, to support 15,000 start-ups by 2030?a)Assamb)New Delhic)Rajasthand)PunjabCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 12 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 12 exam
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App for FREE
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup