Question Description
In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “Strong” arguments and “Weak” arguments in so far as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.Instructions: Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a strong argument and which is a weak argument. Give answerStatement: Should Former Indian players, who have played for India on International level, be allowed to work as coach for the team of other countries?Arguments:I. Yes, that experience which does not harm one’s nation must be used to benefit others.II. No, this will put the prestige of the country in danger because these coaches will reveal our team’s weaknesses to other teams.a)If only argument I is strong.b)If only argument II is strong.c)If either I or II is strong.d)If neither I nor II is strong ; ande)If both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.