Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Banking Exams Exam > Banking Exams Questions > Direction: Read the following graph carefull...

Join the Discussion on the App

Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.

The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by him

Q. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-

a)
The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%
b)
The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%
c)
The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%
d)
The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%
e)
The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given data

Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

IBPS PO Mains Mock Test - 2

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question...

The average runs conceded per wicket for Umesh Yadav and Mohit Sharma in 2011 were 34.8 and 44.2 respectively.

It is given that the total number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma in 2011 was 50% more than that of Umesh Yadav

Let the number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav in 2011 be w

The total number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in 2011 be 34.8w

The total number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma in 2011 = 52.2w

Since, the average runs conceded per wicket for Mohit Sharma in 2011 was 44.2

Therefore, the number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma = 1.181w

Percentage by which number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that of Mohit Sharma = 15.3%

Hence correct answer is option B.

Answered by Notes Wala · View profile

Attention Banking Exams Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Banking Exams study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Banking Exams.

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

General Awareness & Knowledge

Tips & Tricks for Government Exams

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.Eight persons are sitting around a circular table such that some of them are facing towards the centre while some are facing away from centre. M is third to the right of S, who sits second to the left of Y. P sits on the immediate right of X, who faces the same direction as faced by M. Neither X nor P is adjacent to M. C is third to the left of Y. Not more than 4 persons face outside. B and S face same direction. C is third to the right of B. J is second to the left of M. C and J face opposite direction to that of B. Immediate neighbors of C face opposite directions.Q. How many persons face towards the centre?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given belowThere are nine people P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W and X in a family. It is a three generation family. They are sitting in a row facing in North and South directions not necessarily in the same order. The following information is known about them. R who is Ps father sits fourth to the right of Q who is the only daughter of T and they both face in the opposite directions. S sits third to the right of U who is Qs grandmother and one of them sits adjacent to X. S is unmarried and faces in a direction similar to that of V. T who is the sister of S sits at one of the ends with a female. Rs neighbours are females and face in opposite directions. Us spouse R faces in the North direction. X who is the wife of V sits at the middle facing in South direction. P, who is male, is the only sibling of V sits exactly between S and Qs cousin who is a male. The people sitting at ends face in North direction. P faces in the same direction as that of U. R sits adjacent to X.Q. How many males are there in the family?

View answer

Directions: Read the following information carefully and answer the questions given beside.Eight persons are sitting around a circular table such that some of them are facing towards the centre while some are facing away from centre. M is third to the right of S, who sits second to the left of Y. P sits on the immediate right of X, who faces the same direction as faced by M. Neither X nor P is adjacent to M. C is third to the left of Y. Not more than 4 persons face outside. B and S face same direction. C is third to the right of B. J is second to the left of M. C and J face opposite direction to that of B. Immediate neighbors of C face opposite directions.Q. Who is second to the right of C?

View answer

Directions: These questions are based on the following information, read the comprehension carefully to answer the given questions.Eight people A, B, C, D, E, F, G and H are sitting around a circular table but not necessarily in the same order. Some are facing inside and some are facing outside. Not more than two people facing same direction are sitting together.H sits third to the right of C who is not facing outside. Immediate neighbours of H are facing same directions with respect to each other but opposite direction with respect to H who is facing inside. B is the immediate neighbor of E and both are facing same direction. E sits second to the left of C who is not the immediate neighbor of B. There are equal number of persons facing inside and outside direction. B sits third to the left of A and both are facing opposite directions to each other. H sits to the immediate right of D. F sits second to the left of G.Q.If all the persons sitting are equidistant and if H faces south direction, what direction will B be facing?

View answer

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the questions given belowThere are nine people P, Q, R, S, T, U, V, W and X in a family. It is a three generation family. They are sitting in a row facing in North and South directions not necessarily in the same order. The following information is known about them. R who is Ps father sits fourth to the right of Q who is the only daughter of T and they both face in the opposite directions. S sits third to the right of U who is Qs grandmother and one of them sits adjacent to X. S is unmarried and faces in a direction similar to that of V. T who is the sister of S sits at one of the ends with a female. Rs neighbours are females and face in opposite directions. Us spouse R faces in the North direction. X who is the wife of V sits at the middle facing in South direction. P, who is male, is the only sibling of V sits exactly between S and Qs cousin who is a male. The people sitting at ends face in North direction. P faces in the same direction as that of U. R sits adjacent to X.Q. R and S face in which direction in the respective order?

View answer

Top Courses for Banking ExamsView all

Lucent for GK

Current Affairs & Hindu Analysis: Daily, Weekly & Monthly

General Awareness & Knowledge

Tips & Tricks for Government Exams

Improve Your Calculations: Vedic Maths (English)

Top Courses for Banking Exams

View all

Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: Read the following graph carefully and answer the question given below.The following radar gives the average of five bowlers for the two years i.e. 2011 and 2012 in the domestic cricket matches. In cricket, the average of a bowler is the ratio of runs conceded by him to the total number of wickets taken by himQ. In 2011, the number of runs conceded by Mohit Sharma was 50% more than the number of runs conceded by Umesh Yadav in the same year. It can be concluded in 2011 that-a)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was less than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 12.5%b)The number of wickets taken by Umesh Yadav was less than that by Mohit Sharma by approximately 15.3%c)The number of wickets taken by Mohit Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 25%d)The number of wickets taken by Ishant Sharma was more than that by Umesh Yadav by approximately 50%e)The ratio of the number of wickets taken by the given players in 2011 cannot be determined from the given dataCorrect answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.

Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam