Question Description
There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2025 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice There is information in the form of passage given below. Some questions have been framed on the same which can be solved by a careful reading of the passage. You must read the given details carefully and choose the best option for each question as your answer.Ayurveda suffered a decline in the late 19th century in the absence of research and development. Ayurveda was the backbone of health care through ancient and medieval times, until the 19th century, because it was a discipline for ensuring longevity rather than merely treating the symptoms of illness. As scholars have claimed it was a science of life; not merely to cure the sick but also to make the healthy healthier; Chavanprash is an elementary example while Rasayana or rejuvenation is its advanced face.Until Allopathy took long strides in the early decades of the 20th century, Ayurveda commanded its place. Yet Indian scholars have not strategized the recovery of this science of life. Our science of life — Ayur Veda — is potentially a champion of Indian civilizational revival and deserves our serious attention. Its concept of positive health care must be fully discovered. Who does not wish to live well and long? When I began to work, I was 20 and it was considered to be too early. My employers retired its staff and executives at 55. Today, those retired at 60 complain about how to occupy themselves. Most of them are fit to continue working. Death at 71 or 72 is considered tragically young. At Independence time, 60 was an acceptable age to wind up from life. Give or take, life span expectation has jumped by 20 years in better-to-do families. The new challenge before Ayurveda, or any other school of treatment, is how to make the lengthening of lives more interesting, and more readily enjoyable. Ayurveda and its Rasayana have rejuvenation.Similarly, Naturopathy can work wonders. I have witnessed my cousin being made to lose weight and how. When her therapy began, she was 18 years old weighing 216 lbs. In twelve months, the weight came down to 130 lbs. The medicines were few, the diet was strict for six days a week. Once a week she could have even a bar of chocolate. In a country with rampant poverty, Homeopathy can be a good alternative. In some persons, a few drops of its medicines work wonders. All for a few rupees — no pain, no injections, no surgeries. Germans invented it and they must be generously complimented. Unfortunately, hardly anyone has pursued it with research. Hence this wonderful cure has not gone very far. Nevertheless, the system deserves encouragement and greater patronage. Incidentally, Homeopathy is so named because it is not an antagonistic treatment. It is sympathetic in the sense that the medicine aggravate symptoms of the ailment in the hope that they get pushed out of the body. Most other schools of medical treatment are known to be antagonistic which means attacking the symptoms in the hope of killing them. Ayurveda and Naturopathy are different in the sense that one takes a broad view of the patient's whole life or ayu. Naturopathy again leans on nature and tries to bring the patients' living in step with what nature expected. Antagonist treatment can provoke reactions. Homeopathy is different from others in this regard.Ayurveda must be given the credit for innovating the vocation of nursing. Both male and female nursing began centuries ago although the practice took a long time to spread. Indeed, Ayurveda has a record of innovativeness, sustaining a whole Indian civilization with its holistic approach to life. __________, more confidence in its practitioners is necessary; investors would come given this ingredient.Q. Which of the following can be inferred from the passage?(i) The Greeks have contributed to Indian medicine since ages so much so that the life expectancy has gone up(ii) Most of the alternative branches of medicine work on the symptoms and not just the problem(iii) Renowned medicine practitioners have only worked on gastronomy and treatments by working on the stomacha)Only (i)b)Both (i) and (ii)c)Only (ii)d)Both (ii) and (iii)e)NoneCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.