Banking Exams Exam  >  Banking Exams Questions  >   Direction: The question given below consists... Start Learning for Free
Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.
Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.
Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?
Arguments:
I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.
II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"
III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.
  • a)
    None is strong
  • b)
    Only II is strong
  • c)
    Both III and II are strong
  • d)
    Only III is strong
  • e)
    Both I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed...
We first make sure to read the statement carefully and then see what immediate inferences can be drawn based on our first reading. The next step is to look at the arguments given in the options, analyze them and see if they seem relevant with respect to the information/data provided to us. Finally, it is very important to study the question closely.
In the question, it is written that which of the following ‘supports’ the given statement thus, we must look for an option choice which supports the idea of the statement.
Following the aforementioned steps, we must analyze the given statement and the corresponding question closely.
Argument I captures the views of the Finance Minister which led to the Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. It follows the flow of ideas in the most appropriate manner and is thus strong in the sense to support the given idea.
Argument II can be understood as the continuation of the exchange of ideas between the two leaders and it supports the idea that the two leaders intended to hit back at each other.
Argument III can be rejected. It is simply an elaborated version of one of the lines from the given context.
Hence, the correct option is (E).
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2025 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: The question given below consists of a statement, followed by three arguments numbered I, II and III. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are ‘strong’ arguments and which is/are ‘weak’ arguments and accordingly choose your answer from the alternatives given below each question.Statement: If a person disagreeing with the government is a "compulsive contrarian", can someone who always agrees with it be called "his master's voice", asked senior Congress leader P Chidambaram, hitting back at Finance Minister Arun Jaitley. The finance minister has slammed 108 economists and social scientists as "compulsive contrarians" for raising concern over "political interference" to influence statistical data.Which of the following argument supports the above statement in the best possible manner?Arguments:I. In his blog published on Tuesday, Jaitley had said these "compulsive contrarians" have repeatedly signed memorandums of what he said was manufactured political issues against the present government.II. Responding to Jaitley, Chidambaram tweeted: "According to Mr. Jaitley, one who disagrees with the government is a 'compulsive contrarian'. Can we then say that anyone who always agrees with the government is 'His Master's Voice'?"III. As many as 108 economists and social scientists, including Jean Dreze (Allahabad University), Emily Breza (Harvard University), Satish Deshpande (Delhi University), Esther Duflo (MIT, US), and Jayati Ghosh (JNU), had made an appeal last week, expressing their concern over "political interference" in influencing statistical data in India.a)None is strongb)Only II is strongc)Both III and II are strongd)Only III is stronge)Both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'E'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Top Courses for Banking Exams

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev