Question Description
Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the passage given below carefully and answer the questions that follow:With a convincing majority of 141 of 193 countries, the UN General Assembly voted for a resolution that deplored in the “strongest terms” Russia’s attack on Ukraine and demanded an immediate withdrawal of Russian troops. The resolution, which was discussed in a rare special emergency session and under the rubric of the “Uniting for Peace” resolution invoked after decades, came as a result of an aborted resolution at the UN Security Council, which Russia, as a permanent member, had vetoed. Russia rejected the outcome as a political vote that came of severe “pressure” from the U.S. and European countries that were the drivers of the resolution, but it seemed clear that it was isolated on the global stage. Belarus, Eritrea, North Korea and Syria voted against the motion, and 35, including India, abstained. While the resolution also decried the Russian decision to recognise Donetsk and Luhansk as independent states, representatives of member states made it clear that it was the relentless bombing of Ukrainian cities that they could not turn a blind eye to.India’s abstention, not a surprise, disappointed many western countries that have been lobbying for a shift in the Indian position. India has also sent humanitarian aid to Ukraine although its vote of abstention indicates the Modi government still has many reasons not to vote against Russia, a strategic and defence partner that has stood by India. As the conflict continues, and the global community expresses its disapproval, however, India’s desire to remain an “abstentionist” power is being called into question. The Government has also said that it needs to remain on good terms with both sides as its primary focus remains the safe exit of Indians from the conflict zone. While evacuating Indians is an important priority, it cannot be India’s only focus in this crisis.Q. Which of the following can be concluded from the passage given above?a)The conflict is getting severe and that India might have to engage more deeply as being indecisive may not be goodb)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentc)The ties that India has had with Russia since long will always be given preference by the Indian governmentd)India will soon need to play a diplomatic role as Russia is hostile to most other countries than Indiae)Both (a) and (c)Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.