Question Description
Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the passages given below and choose the best answers to the questions that follow.Low carbohydrate diets have become popular as a weight loss technique; however, critics contend such diets may have harmful side effects. One concern has been that low carbohydrate diets, which replace calories from carbohydrates with more consumption of high-protein foods like meat and eggs, alter the body's acid balance. This imbalance could lead to increased bone turnover (more rapid depletion than formation of bone) -- increasing the risk for osteoporosis."That's not what our study found," said lead author John D. Carter, assistant professor in the Division of Rheumatology, USF College of Medicine. "Patients on the low carbohydrate diet did lose weight, but the diet did not appear to compromise bone integrity or lead to bone loss".Earlier animal studies suggested that low carbohydrate-high protein diets could adversely affect bone quality. "I was surprised by the results," Dr. Carter said. "People on low carbohydrate diets absorb less calcium through the gut and excrete more calcium in the urine, so you'd expect they would be leaching their bones." Dr. Carter emphasized that he does not advocate strict low-carbohydrates for long-term weight management. "Such diets may adversely overload the kidneys with protein and lead dieters to consume more artery-clogging saturated fats and cholesterol", he said.The USF study followed 30 overweight patients for three months. Half followed a strict low carbohydrate diet -- consuming less than 20 grams of carbohydrates a day the first month and then less than 40 grams a day for the remaining two months. The control half ate a normal diet with no restrictions. The researchers used blood tests to measure the patients' breakdown and formation of bone and checked urine for signs that the dieters were complying with their low-carbohydrate diets. The difference in bone turnover between the low carbohydrate dieters and the non-dieters was insignificant after three months. But, the dieters lost significantly more weight -- an average of 14 pounds than the patients on unrestricted diets. A potential limitation of the USF study was that the researchers looked for at least a 50 percent difference in bone turnover between the dieters and non-dieters. It's possible that more subtle effects on bone quality might have been found, Dr. Carter said, particularly if the low carbohydrate diet was maintained beyond three months. The basis of a sound weight reduction program should be nutritional education with respect to food and its use in achieving caloric balance and on the need for regular exercise and physical activity. Emphasis should be on the need for a long persistent effort in this most difficult problem. Calories still count -and it would seem that the most desirable metabolic mixture at a reduced calorie level would be the one that would represent all the basic categories of nutritional elements and provide a balanced contribution of all essential nutrients. The advocates of severely restricted carbohydrate diets must consider and share the responsibility related to the increased hazards of such diets.Q. It can be inferred from the passage that:a)Patterns of bone formation differ in animals and humans.b)The USF study is effectively invalid since it does not consider all possibilities.c)A 1ow carbohydrate diet could increase incidences of heart attacks.d)High protein foods are best avoided.Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.