CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >   Directions: Study the following information ... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.
The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.
Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.
When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.
A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.
Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?
  • a)
    Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.
  • b)
    Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.
  • c)
    Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.
  • d)
    Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the ...
Explanation:

Excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms:
- One valid reason for many to believe that the industry is inherently cyclical is the negative outcomes that may follow periods of rapid growth.
- During such periods, there is a tendency for less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations.
- These factors can lead to unsustainable practices and eventually result in negative consequences for the industry.
- Excessive valuations can result in inflated prices for investments, which may not be justified by the actual value of the firms.
- Lenient partnership terms can lead to a lack of accountability and discipline in investment decisions, increasing the risk of failure.

Impact of unsustainable practices:
- The unsustainable practices during periods of rapid growth can result in lower returns for investors in the long run.
- Firms that pay a premium for certain types of investments may not be able to generate high enough returns to sustain their operations.
- This can lead to a situation where firms are unable to raise follow-on funds, leading to a decrease in the overall supply of venture capital in the market.
- The cyclical nature of the industry is driven by these boom and bust cycles, where periods of rapid growth are followed by retrenchment and consolidation.
In conclusion, the belief that the industry is inherently cyclical is grounded in the observation of unsustainable practices during periods of rapid growth, such as excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms, which can have negative consequences for the long-term sustainability of the venture capital market.
Free Test
Community Answer
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the ...
Many believe that industry is cyclical because lenient (less-restrictive) agreements, higher-than-required valuations may lead to negative outcomes. Since a proper picture is not formed due to such rapid surge of investments, people think that businesses will ultimately fail because of these factors. Option 2 highlights this idea. Nothing with respect to option 1 and 3 can be inferred. Option 4 is incorrect because retrenchment is an effect rather than a cause of such venture investments.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2025 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Study the following information carefully and answer the question.The supply of venture capital is likely to continue growing. Within the past two years, numerous government-backed pension funds have invested in private equity for the first time. Many experienced investors have also decided to increase their allocations. This growth naturally begs the question of sustainability. Short-run shifts in the supply of or demand for venture capital investments have had dramatic effects. For instance, periods with a rapid increase in capital commitments have led to less restrictive partnership agreements, large investments in portfolio firms, and higher valuations. These patterns have led many practitioners to conclude that the industry is inherently cyclical, that the side effects associated with periods of rapid growth generate sufficient difficulties that periods of retrenchment are sure to follow.Neoclassical economics teaches us to examine not just the short-run supply and demand effects. Rather, it is also important to consider the nature of long-run supply and demand conditions. In the short run, intense competition between private-equity groups may lead to a willingness to pay a premium for certain types of firms. This is unlikely to be a sustainable strategy in the long run: firms that persist in such a strategy will eventually achieve low returns and be unable to raise follow-on funds. The types of factors that will determine the long-run, steady-state supply of venture capital in the economy are likely to be more fundamental. These most likely will include the magnitude of fundamental technological innovation in the economy, the presence of liquid and competitive markets for venture capitalists to sell their investments and the willingness of highly skilled managers and engineers to work in entrepreneurial environments.When one examines these more fundamental factors, there appears to have been quite substantial changes for the better over the past several decades. While the increase in innovative outputs can be seen through several measures, probably the clearest indication is in the extent of patenting. Patent applications by U.S. inventors have surged over the past decade to over 120 thousand per year. This does not appear to reflect the impact of changes in domestic patent policy or shifts in the success rate of applications. Rather, it appears to reflect a fundamental shift in the innovative fecundity in the domestic economy.A second change has been in the development of what economists term "agglomeration economies" in the regions with the greatest venture capital activity. The efficiency of the venture capital process itself has been greatly augmented by the emergence of other intermediaries familiar with the workings of the venture process. The presence of such expertise on the part of lawyers, accountants, and real estate brokers, among others, has substantially lowered the transaction costs associated with forming and financing new firms. In short, the increasing familiarity with the venture capital process has itself made the long-term prospects for venture investment more attractive than they have ever been before, in this country or abroad. Much is still not yet known about the venture capital industry. The extent to which the U.S. venture model will spread overseas and the degree to which the American model will — or can — be successfully adapted during this process are particularly interesting questions.Which of the following is a valid reason for many to believe that the 'industry is inherently cyclical'?a)Innovation is a cyclical aspect that emerges rapidly whenever a new generation of people enters the market.b)Negative outcomes may follow because of excessive valuations and lenient partnership terms.c)Venture capital's funds are exhausted after a rise in investments leading to a dearth of funds in the following period.d)Retrenchments lead to a loss of human resources, thus making the industry cyclical in terms of profitability.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev