Banking Exams Exam  >  Banking Exams Questions  >   Direction: In making decisions about importa... Start Learning for Free
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.
Statement:
Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?
Arguments:
I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.
II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.
  • a)
    If only argument I is strong
  • b)
    If only argument II is strong
  • c)
    If either I or II is strong
  • d)
    If neither I nor II is strong
  • e)
    If both I and II are strong
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desir...
As we see in the statement, it talks about the privatization of railways. If railways in India are privatized there will be lots of changes in services, prices, and facilities. Argument I is strong because "competitiveness" and "better service" are desirable.
Thus, the argument I is strong. The argument II is weak because the argument has a flawed assumption that MNC's are a threat to national security without any basis in facts.
Hence, the correct option is (A).
Free Test
Community Answer
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desir...
Strong vs. Weak Arguments in Privatizing Indian Railways
Argument I: Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.
- This argument is strong as it directly addresses the key question of whether privatizing Indian railways can lead to increased competitiveness and improved services for the public.
- It highlights the potential benefits of privatization, such as introducing competition, efficiency, and innovation in the sector.
- The argument focuses on the welfare of the public and the overall improvement of railway services, making it directly related to the question at hand.
Argument II: No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.
- This argument is weak as it does not directly address the main question of whether privatization can bring positive changes to Indian railways.
- It raises concerns about national security, which may not be directly related to the efficiency and service quality of the railways.
- The argument focuses on a potential negative consequence of privatization, but it does not provide a strong case against the overall benefits of introducing competition and efficiency in the sector.
Therefore, in this case, only argument I is strong as it directly relates to the question of whether privatizing Indian railways can lead to increased competitiveness and better service for the public.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those, which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those, which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question. The question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments a Strong argument is and which a weak argument is.Statement:Should the railways in India be privatized in a phased manner like other public sector enterprises?Arguments:I. Yes, this is the only way to bring in competitiveness and provide better service to the public.II. No, this will pose a threat to the national security of our country as multinationals will enter into the fray.a)If only argument I is strongb)If only argument II is strongc)If either I or II is strongd)If neither I nor II is stronge)If both I and II are strongCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Top Courses for Banking Exams

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev