All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Banking Exams Exam  >  Banking Exams Questions  >   IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a des... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?
  • a)
    The software has been launched in 14 languages
  • b)
    The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.
  • c)
    The software would scan documents using Unicode encoding
  • d)
    The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.
  • e)
    None of these
Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Most Upvoted Answer
IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable e...
The software e-Aksharayan was launched in 7 Indian languages. They are namely: Hindi, Bangla, Malayalam, Gurmukhi, Tamil, Kannada & Assamese.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Similar Banking Exams Doubts

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people, excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage. The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Nariman on Tuesday said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.“You see, a claimant submits documents to prove his legacy from his father. A family tree is drawn, which includes the claimant’s siblings, etc. The authorities verify his claim with each one of the member in the family tree before deciding his claim [for citizenship]. Now, your SOP says that a person can submit fresh documents claiming to prove his legacy from his grandfather. Now, the family tree has to be recreated. Everything has to be re-verified. This amounts to redoing the entire exercise. Why?”, Justice Gogoi asked Attorney General K.K. Venugopal.Besides, the Bench pointed out, the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once. Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed. “Are you not contradicting yourself here?” Justice Gogoi asked Mr. Venugopal.The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government's proposal to submit fresh documents. Mr. Hajela has to file his report before September 5, the next date of hearing.Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date. This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.“Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the 'claims and objections' stage, will upset the apple cart,” Justice Nariman observed.Mr. Venugopal countered that the government is giving “another chance to people who risk losing all their rights”.To this, Justice Nariman agreed that the court was dealing with “human problems of a huge magnitude”.“Consequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance. Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?” Justice Nariman asked Mr. Hajela, stakeholders and petitioners in the litigation.To this, Mr. Hajela said reopening of family trees would risk the possibility of “trading of legacies or meeting of minds”. "Giving a second chance would only open trading in legacies. There may be people who are willing to sell the legacies to others,” he said.The Supreme Court further asked Mr. Hajela to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC. This is after Mr. Hajela placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.Which among the following substantiates the observation of the Supreme Court that the government is contradicting its own stand in the issue of National Register of Citizens?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people, excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage. The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Nariman on Tuesday said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.“You see, a claimant submits documents to prove his legacy from his father. A family tree is drawn, which includes the claimant’s siblings, etc. The authorities verify his claim with each one of the member in the family tree before deciding his claim [for citizenship]. Now, your SOP says that a person can submit fresh documents claiming to prove his legacy from his grandfather. Now, the family tree has to be recreated. Everything has to be re-verified. This amounts to redoing the entire exercise. Why?”, Justice Gogoi asked Attorney General K.K. Venugopal.Besides, the Bench pointed out, the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once. Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed. “Are you not contradicting yourself here?” Justice Gogoi asked Mr. Venugopal.The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government's proposal to submit fresh documents. Mr. Hajela has to file his report before September 5, the next date of hearing.Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date. This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.“Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the 'claims and objections' stage, will upset the apple cart,” Justice Nariman observed.Mr. Venugopal countered that the government is giving “another chance to people who risk losing all their rights”.To this, Justice Nariman agreed that the court was dealing with “human problems of a huge magnitude”.“Consequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance. Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?” Justice Nariman asked Mr. Hajela, stakeholders and petitioners in the litigation.To this, Mr. Hajela said reopening of family trees would risk the possibility of “trading of legacies or meeting of minds”. "Giving a second chance would only open trading in legacies. There may be people who are willing to sell the legacies to others,” he said.The Supreme Court further asked Mr. Hajela to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC. This is after Mr. Hajela placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.Which among the following is a possible consequence of the new standard operating procedure adopted by the Government regarding the National Register of Citizens?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people, excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage. The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Nariman on Tuesday said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.“You see, a claimant submits documents to prove his legacy from his father. A family tree is drawn, which includes the claimant’s siblings, etc. The authorities verify his claim with each one of the member in the family tree before deciding his claim [for citizenship]. Now, your SOP says that a person can submit fresh documents claiming to prove his legacy from his grandfather. Now, the family tree has to be recreated. Everything has to be re-verified. This amounts to redoing the entire exercise. Why?”, Justice Gogoi asked Attorney General K.K. Venugopal.Besides, the Bench pointed out, the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once. Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed. “Are you not contradicting yourself here?” Justice Gogoi asked Mr. Venugopal.The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government's proposal to submit fresh documents. Mr. Hajela has to file his report before September 5, the next date of hearing.Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date. This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.“Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the 'claims and objections' stage, will upset the apple cart,” Justice Nariman observed.Mr. Venugopal countered that the government is giving “another chance to people who risk losing all their rights”.To this, Justice Nariman agreed that the court was dealing with “human problems of a huge magnitude”.“Consequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance. Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?” Justice Nariman asked Mr. Hajela, stakeholders and petitioners in the litigation.To this, Mr. Hajela said reopening of family trees would risk the possibility of “trading of legacies or meeting of minds”. "Giving a second chance would only open trading in legacies. There may be people who are willing to sell the legacies to others,” he said.The Supreme Court further asked Mr. Hajela to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC. This is after Mr. Hajela placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.Which among the following is true regarding the new move of the Government regarding the National Register of Citizens in Assam?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people, excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage. The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Nariman on Tuesday said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.“You see, a claimant submits documents to prove his legacy from his father. A family tree is drawn, which includes the claimant’s siblings, etc. The authorities verify his claim with each one of the member in the family tree before deciding his claim [for citizenship]. Now, your SOP says that a person can submit fresh documents claiming to prove his legacy from his grandfather. Now, the family tree has to be recreated. Everything has to be re-verified. This amounts to redoing the entire exercise. Why?”, Justice Gogoi asked Attorney General K.K. Venugopal.Besides, the Bench pointed out, the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once. Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed. “Are you not contradicting yourself here?” Justice Gogoi asked Mr. Venugopal.The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government's proposal to submit fresh documents. Mr. Hajela has to file his report before September 5, the next date of hearing.Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date. This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.“Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the 'claims and objections' stage, will upset the apple cart,” Justice Nariman observed.Mr. Venugopal countered that the government is giving “another chance to people who risk losing all their rights”.To this, Justice Nariman agreed that the court was dealing with “human problems of a huge magnitude”.“Consequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance. Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?” Justice Nariman asked Mr. Hajela, stakeholders and petitioners in the litigation.To this, Mr. Hajela said reopening of family trees would risk the possibility of “trading of legacies or meeting of minds”. "Giving a second chance would only open trading in legacies. There may be people who are willing to sell the legacies to others,” he said.The Supreme Court further asked Mr. Hajela to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC. This is after Mr. Hajela placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.Which among the following is opposite in meaning to the word deferred as used in the passage?

Direction: Read the following passage carefully and answer the questions that follow.The Supreme Court on Tuesday asked the Union government whether it is giving the over 40 lakh people, excluded from the National Register of Citizens (NRC) in Assam, a “second chance” to gain citizenship by allowing them to produce fresh documents to prove their Indian legacy.The court was referring to the Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) proposed by the government, which allows a claimant for Indian citizenship to “change his legacy” by submitting additional documents at the ‘claims and objections’ stage. The court asked whether this would amount to “re-doing the claims” of those left out from the draft NRC published on July 30.A Bench of Justices Ranjan Gogoi and Rohinton Nariman on Tuesday said allowing a claimant to change his legacy would amount to “tinkering with the family tree” and re-doing the verification process.“You see, a claimant submits documents to prove his legacy from his father. A family tree is drawn, which includes the claimant’s siblings, etc. The authorities verify his claim with each one of the member in the family tree before deciding his claim [for citizenship]. Now, your SOP says that a person can submit fresh documents claiming to prove his legacy from his grandfather. Now, the family tree has to be recreated. Everything has to be re-verified. This amounts to redoing the entire exercise. Why?”, Justice Gogoi asked Attorney General K.K. Venugopal.Besides, the Bench pointed out, the government, in the beginning, had specified that documents on legacy would be allowed to be filed only once. Now, it has changed tack to permit additional documents to be filed. “Are you not contradicting yourself here?” Justice Gogoi asked Mr. Venugopal.The court directed Assam State NRC Coordinator Prateek Hajela to file a report on the ramifications of the government's proposal to submit fresh documents. Mr. Hajela has to file his report before September 5, the next date of hearing.Meanwhile, the court deferred the receipt of claims and objections to a later date. This stage was supposed to start within the next days, on August 30, and would have continued till October 28.“Allowing a person to suddenly pull out an additional document, that too at the 'claims and objections' stage, will upset the apple cart,” Justice Nariman observed.Mr. Venugopal countered that the government is giving “another chance to people who risk losing all their rights”.To this, Justice Nariman agreed that the court was dealing with “human problems of a huge magnitude”.“Consequences are so severe that should they be given one more chance. Suppose a claimant has misfired once but can deliver in the next. Why should such a person not be given another chance?” Justice Nariman asked Mr. Hajela, stakeholders and petitioners in the litigation.To this, Mr. Hajela said reopening of family trees would risk the possibility of “trading of legacies or meeting of minds”. "Giving a second chance would only open trading in legacies. There may be people who are willing to sell the legacies to others,” he said.The Supreme Court further asked Mr. Hajela to submit a report with a time-frame to carry out the sample re-verification of at least 10 per cent of the names included in the final draft NRC. This is after Mr. Hajela placed before the Bench a district-wise data of the percentage of the population who have been excluded from the final draft NRC.Which among the following is similar in meaning to the word Ramifications as used in the passage?

Top Courses for Banking ExamsView all

Top Courses for Banking Exams

IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice IT Ministry has launched E-Aksharayan, a desktop software to enable editing of text printed on scanned documents in 2018. Which among the following is NOT correct about the software?a)The software has been launched in 14 languagesb)The software would scan printed Indian language documents into a fully editable text format.c)The software would scan documents using Unicode encodingd)The software would cease the gap in Internet accessibility due to non-availability of content in Indian languages.e)None of theseCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.
Explore Courses for Banking Exams exam

Top Courses for Banking Exams

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup