Question Description
Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: A passage is given below followed by a possible inference, which can be drawn from the facts stated in the passage. You have to examine the inference in the context of the passage and decide upon its degree of truth or falsity.Mark answer (A) if the inference is "definitely true", i.e. it properly follows from the statement of facts given.Mark answer (B) if the inference is "probably true" though not "definitely true" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (C) if the "data is inadequate", i.e. from the facts given, you cannot say whether the inference is likely to be true or false.Mark answer (D) if the inference is "probably false" though not "definitely false" in the light of the facts given.Mark answer (E) if the inference is "definitely false", i.e. it cannot possibly be drawn from the facts given or it contradicts the given facts.As costs of repayment and interest spike, exchequers can be wiped out. The most important reason why India was relatively insulated from the global meltdown of 2008-09 was because our capital controls restricted the amounts which the government and companies could have borrowed globally; this insulated us from the devastating downgrades and bond market movements that damaged European economies.In the past, India has borrowed overseas in times of trouble. It floated quasi-sovereign bonds in 1991 during our economic crisis, in 1998 after the Asian crisis and in 2001 when the economy was weak and the rupee headed south.Each time, the economy sprung back, not because of the loans but because of reforms. The only people, who will laugh their way to the bank, if the government decides to shop for loans, will be investment bankers, not the government or taxpayers. Today, with nearly $300 billion in reserves, and near-5% growth, there is no reason to panic and shop for loans abroad.It is said that global confidence in India is fickle. Yet, FMCG giant Unilever is bringing in $4.5 billion to buttress its stake in its Indian arm, because it sees growth prospects here as better than elsewhere in the world. It is betting on India's growth prospects with hard cash. The government should reciprocate purposefully: clearing long pending projects, reforming sectors like coal and electricity and rolling out ambitious projects like the Delhi-Mumbai infrastructure corridor.Global companies are investing in India despite weak investor confidence.a)(A)b)(B)c)(C)d)(D)e)(E)Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.