Question Description
The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice The given passage has a blank and a sentence that is highlighted as it might have an error in it. You are required to read the same carefully and answer the questions that follow:The United States pivot to Asia strategy was originally conceptualized by the Obama administration. The strategy entailed the rebalance of US economic, diplomatic and military assets from other states to the Asia Pacific region. The increased US military presence in the region during then US president Barack Obama's term resulted in countries raising their military expenditure to cater for arms procurement and funding of their armed forces. This also led to heightened tensions over maritime territories in the region. In a bid to outshine the US, China increased its military, economic and diplomatic activity in the region. The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'. This policy was replaced by then US president Donald J Trump's 'America First' policy although as far as the Indo-Pacific was concerned, the strategic aim remained unchanged -- the containment of China.AUKUS in my view is a revival and a follow on of the Pivot to Asia strategy by the Biden administration which signals the resurgence of US influence on the Indo-Pacific region and their readiness to face the Chinese threat with plans for intensified military and economic presence to forward US interests. While the US never abandoned its Pivot to Asia strategy, Biden has renewed the US commitment to the region by focusing on retaining the balance of power and identifying allied partners to address the China challenge. The envisaged plans for future partnerships regarding military assistance entail going beyond the existing Quad which is now translated into reality by this pact. This would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.The immediate follow up of the AUKUS pact was the decision by Australia to cancel the contract for the supply of 12 short fin Barracuda class submarines from France and opting for SSNs (nuclear-powered general-purpose attack submarines) ________________________________ with the UK and the US. In 2016, the government of then Australian prime minister Malcolm Turnbull signed a deal with the French firm Naval Group to design a new generation of 12 submarines that would be mostly built in Australia and partly in France. The programme was beset with delays and cost blowouts, leading to uncertainty and tension behind the scenes.The AUKUS pact seems to have received a positive response from an Indian perspective which signals Washington's political resolve to confront the growing security challenges in the Indo-Pacific region. Although the pact would be focusing mainly on the Pacific and the South China Sea region, any action designed to deter China with or without New Delhi's active participation is a welcome move. India is focused on resolving the land border issues with China and hence has to depend upon partnerships to secure its maritime domain which is threatened by massive expansion plans of the PLA Navy. Towards this, having France as a maritime partner which has sovereign island territories and security interests in the Indian Ocean can expand India's reach in the region. It would be worthwhile to consider strengthening maritime security cooperation with France which would enable us to focus on our area of interest in Indian ocean region as the net security provider. Cooperation with France would also provide India with an alternate/wider option to Russia to progress with the SSN programme considering that transfer of nuclear technology may be easier since it would be a win-win situation for both countries.Which of the following is not correct as per the given passage?a)The US will supply highly enriched uranium to Australia to fuel the submarines; Australia has agreed not to produce highly enriched uranium itself.b)The pivot to Asia was heavily criticized by foreign policy analysts and think-tanks even calling it 'Obama's biggest mistake'.c)The pact would also compensate for the absence of a security component currently in the perceived Quad alliance.d)Both (a) and (b)e)All are correctCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.