SSC CGL Exam  >  SSC CGL Questions  >   Read the following passage and answer the qu... Start Learning for Free
Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.
Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.
Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.
A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.
Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?
  • a)
    Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilled
  • b)
    Both generations consider culture and traditions equally
  • c)
    Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values more
  • d)
    Economic development does not create any generation gap
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Gover...
  • In the passage, it is mentioned that younger generation is more skilled and are also attracted to the cultures of tourist. While the older generations find their traditions devalued or rejected.
  • It can be referred from the lines: Economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master knew skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.
  • Thus, option C is correct.
The correct answer is Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values more.
Free Test
Community Answer
Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Gover...
Understanding the Generation Gap in Economic Development
Economic development often introduces changes that can create a divide between generations. In the context of tourism, this phenomenon is particularly pronounced.
Skills Disparity
- The younger generation tends to acquire new skills that align with the demands of modern tourism and global culture.
- They are more likely to embrace new technologies and practices that come with economic development, making them more adaptable and skilled.
Traditional Values vs. Modernization
- Conversely, the older generation may hold onto traditional values and practices, which can seem outdated in the face of rapid economic and cultural changes.
- As the younger generation embraces modern ideas, the older generation may feel their traditions are devalued or rejected, leading to feelings of alienation.
Cultural Influence of Tourists
- Tourists bring diverse cultures and lifestyles, which can be particularly appealing to younger individuals seeking new experiences and identities.
- This cultural influx can further drive a wedge between generations, as younger people may gravitate towards the new and exciting, while older individuals may prefer to preserve their heritage.
Potential for Tension
- The clash between progressive ideas embraced by the youth and the conservative values held by the older generation can result in social tensions.
- Economic development, particularly through tourism, can amplify these tensions, as it often prioritizes modern skills over traditional knowledge.
In conclusion, economic development, especially through tourism, tends to exaggerate the generation gap by enhancing the skill set of the younger generation while often leaving the older generation feeling sidelined and disconnected from the evolving cultural landscape.
Explore Courses for SSC CGL exam

Similar SSC CGL Doubts

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourisms capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourisms economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A countrys culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. Suggest a word that can replace spin off in the passage

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. Suggest a suitable title for the passage

DirectionsRead the passage given below and answer the questions that follow based on it.By launching the GSAT-9‘South Asia satellite’, India has reaffirmed the Indian Space Research Organisation’s scientific prowess, but the messaging is perhaps more geopolitical than geospatial. To begin with, the Centre has kept its promise of considering India’s “neighbourhood first”. Within a month of taking over as Prime Minister in 2014, Narendra Modi went to Sriharikota for the launch of PSLV C-23 and “challenged” ISRO scientists to build this satellite for the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. The decision was then announced at the SAARC summit in Kathmandu, and the government has kept its commitment of gifting its neighbours at least one transponder each on the GSAT-9, a project that cost about 450 crore. India has no doubt gained goodwill across the subcontinent through the gesture, and the moment was neatly captured by the videoconference that followed the launch, showing all SAARC leaders (with the exception of Pakistan’s) together on one screen as they spoke of the benefits they would receive in communication, telemedicine, meteorological forecasting and broadcasting. The message is equally strong to South Asia’s other benefactor, China, at a time when it is preparing to demonstrate its global clout at the Belt and Road Forum on May 14-15. The Belt and Road Initiative is an infrastructure network that every SAARC nation other than India has signed on to. China has pledged billions of dollars in projects to each of the countries in the region; that, India is obviously not in a position to match.Where India does excel is in its space programme, as it is the only country in South Asia that has independently launched satellites onindigenouslydeveloped launch vehicles. However, in recent years Pakistan and Sri Lanka have launched satellites with assistance from China, while Afghanistan, the Maldives and Nepal are also understood to have discussed satellite projects with China. Bangladesh, which will launch its first satellite Bangabandhu-1 this year, is working with a European agency. With the GSLV launch India is showing that where it is capable its commitment to the development of its neighbours is strong. Finally, by going ahead with the project despite Pakistan’s decision to pull out, the Modi government is signalling that it will continue with its plans for the neighbourhood — ‘SAARC minus one’ — if necessary. This vision was dealt a minor blow recently when Bhutan pulled out of the ‘mini-SAARC’ alternative plan of a motor vehicles agreement for BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India Nepal), but the government’s persistence indicates it will not bedeterredby the obvious domestic constraints of the SAARC grouping. As Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani, particularly aggrieved by Pakistan’s refusal to grant transit rights for India-Afghanistan trade, said at the launch of the GSLV-F09: “If cooperation through land is not possible, we can be connected through space.”Q. Choose the word which has its meaning most similar to the word ‘indigenously’used in the passage.

DirectionsRead the passage given below and answer the questions that follow based on it.By launching the GSAT-9‘South Asia satellite’, India has reaffirmed the Indian Space Research Organisation’s scientific prowess, but the messaging is perhaps more geopolitical than geospatial. To begin with, the Centre has kept its promise of considering India’s “neighbourhood first”. Within a month of taking over as Prime Minister in 2014, Narendra Modi went to Sriharikota for the launch of PSLV C-23 and “challenged” ISRO scientists to build this satellite for the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation. The decision was then announced at the SAARC summit in Kathmandu, and the government has kept its commitment of gifting its neighbours at least one transponder each on the GSAT-9, a project that cost about 450 crore. India has no doubt gained goodwill across the subcontinent through the gesture, and the moment was neatly captured by the videoconference that followed the launch, showing all SAARC leaders (with the exception of Pakistan’s) together on one screen as they spoke of the benefits they would receive in communication, telemedicine, meteorological forecasting and broadcasting. The message is equally strong to South Asia’s other benefactor, China, at a time when it is preparing to demonstrate its global clout at the Belt and Road Forum on May 14-15. The Belt and Road Initiative is an infrastructure network that every SAARC nation other than India has signed on to. China has pledged billions of dollars in projects to each of the countries in the region; that, India is obviously not in a position to match.Where India does excel is in its space programme, as it is the only country in South Asia that has independently launched satellites onindigenouslydeveloped launch vehicles. However, in recent years Pakistan and Sri Lanka have launched satellites with assistance from China, while Afghanistan, the Maldives and Nepal are also understood to have discussed satellite projects with China. Bangladesh, which will launch its first satellite Bangabandhu-1 this year, is working with a European agency. With the GSLV launch India is showing that where it is capable its commitment to the development of its neighbours is strong. Finally, by going ahead with the project despite Pakistan’s decision to pull out, the Modi government is signalling that it will continue with its plans for the neighbourhood — ‘SAARC minus one’ — if necessary. This vision was dealt a minor blow recently when Bhutan pulled out of the ‘mini-SAARC’ alternative plan of a motor vehicles agreement for BBIN (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India Nepal), but the government’s persistence indicates it will not bedeterredby the obvious domestic constraints of the SAARC grouping. As Afghanistan President Ashraf Ghani, particularly aggrieved by Pakistan’s refusal to grant transit rights for India-Afghanistan trade, said at the launch of the GSLV-F09: “If cooperation through land is not possible, we can be connected through space.”What according to the passage helped India gain goodwill across the subcontinent?

Top Courses for SSC CGL

Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for SSC CGL 2024 is part of SSC CGL preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the SSC CGL exam syllabus. Information about Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for SSC CGL 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for SSC CGL. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for SSC CGL Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Read the following passage and answer the questions that follow.Governments have seized on tourism as a way of creating employment and bringing income preferable foreign exchange into troubled economies. For years, tourism's capacity to filter wealth through communities has been a major argument in its favor. The tourists spend money on accommodation, food, and souvenirs, bringing income to the suppliers of these goods and services whose money in turn circulate through the economy. But if the hotels are foreign-owned, local people have little to gain. Nor are they better off if tourists stay among them but come prepared to be self-sufficient. In both cases, tourists are often strongly resented by locals, who see huge increases in prices as the only tangible result of tourism's economic effects.Job creation is another spin-off from tourism. Government subsidy tourism projects in the expectation of increasing employment opportunities in the new hotels and restaurants. But such work is frequently poorly paid. Local people may be neither willing to do demeaning unskilled jobs nor highly trained enough to be managers and entrepreneurs, they stand only on the sidelines while expatriate staff and migrants fill the vacancies. Social tensions, surface all too easily in such situations. Any kind of change brings tension and economic development tends to exaggerate the generation gap as the young master new skills and the older generation finds its traditions devalued or rejected. Tourists bring with them very different cultures and ideas demonstrated by the way they dress and behave, and these may be very attractive to the younger generation.A country's culture is often a major attraction, particularly when it is combined with sun, sea, and sand. In Thailand, as in many countries with a rich heritage, tourist demands have given a much-needed boost to local arts and crafts. The phenomenal growth in Arts festivals from Edinburgh to Hongkong has brought tourists to festival towns and given some of their inhabitants access to global culture. But, tourists are seen polluting and spoiling the environment, which is a huge demerit of tourism.Q. How does economic development exaggerate generation gap?a)Older generation is skilled and younger generation is unskilledb)Both generations consider culture and traditions equallyc)Younger generation is skilled while the older generation clings to traditional values mored)Economic development does not create any generation gapCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice SSC CGL tests.
Explore Courses for SSC CGL exam

Top Courses for SSC CGL

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev