Question Description
Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for GMAT 2024 is part of GMAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the GMAT exam syllabus. Information about Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for GMAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for GMAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for GMAT Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Sasha: Handwriting analysis should be banned in court as evidence of a person’s character: handwriting analysts called as witnesses habitually exaggerate the reliability of their analyses.Gregory: You are right that the current use of handwriting analysis as evidence is problematic. But this problem exists only because there is no licensing board to set professional standards and thus deter irresponsible analyst from making exaggerated claims. When such a board is established, however, handwriting analysis by licensed practitioners will be a legitimate courtroom tool for character assessment.Gregory does which one of the following in responding to Sasha’s argument?a)He ignores evidence introduced as support for Sasha’s recommendation.b)He defends a principle by restricting the class to which it is to be applied.c)He abstracts a general principle from specific evidence.d)He identifies a self-contradictory statement in Sasha’s argument.e)He shows that Sasha’s argument itself manifests the undesirable characteristic that it condemns.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice GMAT tests.