Which of the following was/were not part/parts of the RIN Mutiny?1. In...
Indian National Army and Lord Irwin were not associated with the RIN Mutiny.
Important Points
- On February 18, 1946, a section of non-commissioned officers and sailors, serving in the Royal Indian Navy, mutinied against the British Officers.
- The mutiny of the "ratings” of the HMIS Talwar and the Royal Indian Navy (RIN) Signal School in Bombaystarted as a hunger strike by the sailors (ratings)to protest against the hardships faced by them.
- The RIN strike came at a time of violent upsurges over the INA trials.
Which of the following was/were not part/parts of the RIN Mutiny?1. In...
The correct answer is option 'C' - 1 and 4. Let's understand each option in detail:
1. Indian National Army (INA): The Indian National Army (INA) was indeed a part of the RIN Mutiny. The RIN Mutiny, also known as the Royal Indian Navy Mutiny, took place in February 1946, when Indian sailors of the Royal Indian Navy revolted against the British naval officers and authorities. The INA, led by Subhas Chandra Bose, was an armed force established with the aim of liberating India from British rule. While the INA played a significant role in the Indian independence movement, it was not directly involved in the RIN Mutiny.
2. HMIS Talwar: HMIS Talwar was a ship of the Royal Indian Navy. During the RIN Mutiny, several ships and establishments of the Royal Indian Navy, including HMIS Talwar, were involved in the revolt. Therefore, HMIS Talwar was indeed a part of the RIN Mutiny. It is incorrect to say that HMIS Talwar was not a part of the mutiny.
3. Hunger strike by naval ratings: The hunger strike by naval ratings was one of the key aspects of the RIN Mutiny. The sailors went on a hunger strike to protest against their poor working conditions, low pay, racial discrimination, and lack of opportunities for promotion. The hunger strike was an integral part of the mutiny and contributed to the demands and grievances of the naval ratings.
4. Lord Irwin: Lord Irwin, also known as Edward Frederick Lindley Wood, was not directly related to the RIN Mutiny. He served as the Viceroy of India from 1926 to 1931, and his tenure was marked by significant political developments, including the signing of the Gandhi-Irwin Pact in 1931. However, Lord Irwin's role or involvement in the RIN Mutiny is not mentioned in historical records, making it incorrect to consider him as a part of the mutiny.
In conclusion, the options that were not part of the RIN Mutiny are 1. Indian National Army (INA) and 4. Lord Irwin. The mutiny involved the revolt of Indian sailors, including those on HMIS Talwar, and the hunger strike by naval ratings.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed BPSC (Bihar) study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in BPSC (Bihar).