UGC NET Exam > UGC NET Questions > Directions: In making decisions about an impo...
Start Learning for Free
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between 'strong' arguments and 'weak' arguments. 'Strong' arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. 'Weak' arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' argument(s) and which is/are 'weak' argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.
The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are 'strong' argument(s) and which is/are 'weak' argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.
Q. Should there be a silver bullet solution for the 'Kashmir problem'?
Arguments:
I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.
II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.
Arguments:
I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.
II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.
- a)Only argument I is strong.
- b)Only argument II is strong.
- c)Either I or II is strong.
- d)Both I and II are strong.
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
| FREE This question is part of | Download PDF Attempt this Test |
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is des...
A 'silver bullet solution' refers to 'immediate solution to an intractable problem'.
Argument I refers to many problems along with the problem of Kashmir. But this does not mean that no silver bullet solution should be there to the Kashmir problem.
Argument II is strong. There are many internal problems in Kashmir and each requires separate solution as a holistic approach and not a silver bullet solution. So, option 2 is the correct answer.
Argument I refers to many problems along with the problem of Kashmir. But this does not mean that no silver bullet solution should be there to the Kashmir problem.
Argument II is strong. There are many internal problems in Kashmir and each requires separate solution as a holistic approach and not a silver bullet solution. So, option 2 is the correct answer.
Free Test
FREE
| Start Free Test |
Community Answer
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is des...
Strong and Weak Arguments: Kashmir Problem
Strong Argument: No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.
- This argument directly addresses the complexity of the Kashmir issue by highlighting the various underlying problems such as governance issues and polarizing politics.
- It emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach towards solving the Kashmir problem, recognizing that a one-size-fits-all solution may not be effective.
- By acknowledging the multifaceted nature of the problem, this argument shows a deep understanding of the challenges involved in resolving the Kashmir conflict.
Weak Argument: No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.
- While this argument acknowledges the existence of multiple Kashmir-related problems, it does not provide a clear roadmap for addressing them.
- It does not delve into the specifics of the disparate problems or offer any concrete solutions, making it a weaker argument compared to the second one.
- Focusing on the need for divergent means and different stages without elaborating on what these means or stages entail weakens the overall argument.
Therefore, in the context of finding a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem, argument II is the stronger one as it recognizes the intricate nature of the issues involved and the need for tailored solutions to address them effectively.
Strong Argument: No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.
- This argument directly addresses the complexity of the Kashmir issue by highlighting the various underlying problems such as governance issues and polarizing politics.
- It emphasizes the need for a nuanced approach towards solving the Kashmir problem, recognizing that a one-size-fits-all solution may not be effective.
- By acknowledging the multifaceted nature of the problem, this argument shows a deep understanding of the challenges involved in resolving the Kashmir conflict.
Weak Argument: No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.
- While this argument acknowledges the existence of multiple Kashmir-related problems, it does not provide a clear roadmap for addressing them.
- It does not delve into the specifics of the disparate problems or offer any concrete solutions, making it a weaker argument compared to the second one.
- Focusing on the need for divergent means and different stages without elaborating on what these means or stages entail weakens the overall argument.
Therefore, in the context of finding a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem, argument II is the stronger one as it recognizes the intricate nature of the issues involved and the need for tailored solutions to address them effectively.
Attention UGC NET Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UGC NET study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UGC NET.
|
Explore Courses for UGC NET exam
|
|
Top Courses for UGC NETView all
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2024 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET.
Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of
Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an
ample number of questions to practice Directions: In making decisions about an important question, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between strong arguments and weak arguments. Strong arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. Weak arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.The given question is followed by arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is/are strong argument(s) and which is/are weak argument(s) and mark your answer accordingly.Q.Should there be a silver bullet solution for the Kashmir problem?Arguments:I. No, there is not just one Kashmir problem in the country, but many, and each requires redressal by divergent means and at different stages.II. No, there is a set of disparate problems of governance and of a communal, polarising and disruptive politics, each demanding a separate solution.a)Only argument I is strong.b)Only argument II is strong.c)Either I or II is strong.d)Both I and II are strong.Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.
|
|
Explore Courses for UGC NET exam
|
|
Suggested Free Tests
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
|
© EduRev
|
Education Revolution
|
Follow Us
|
Signup to see your scores
go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup