Question Description
Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for Banking Exams 2024 is part of Banking Exams preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Banking Exams exam syllabus. Information about Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Banking Exams 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Banking Exams. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Banking Exams Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Direction: In the question below are given three statements followed by two conclusions. You have to take the given statements to be true even if they seem to be at variance with commonly known facts. Read all the conclusions and then decide which of the given conclusions logically follows from the given statements disregarding commonly known facts.Statement:I. Some hockey is tennisII. All football is basketballIII. No football is hockeyConclusions:I. Some tennis is not footballII. Some basketball is hockeya)Only conclusion I followsb)Only conclusion II followsc)Either conclusion I or II followsd)Neither conclusion I or II followse)Both conclusion I and II followsCorrect answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Banking Exams tests.