Answer:

The statement is False. The Supreme Court of India has indeed taken several steps to address the issue of manual scavenging and has made efforts to ban this inhumane practice.

Supreme Court's role:
The Supreme Court of India has been actively involved in addressing the issue of manual scavenging and has played a crucial role in efforts to eradicate this practice. Here are some key actions taken by the Supreme Court:

1. Judicial Pronouncements: The Supreme Court has made several judicial pronouncements highlighting the need to abolish manual scavenging and recognizing it as a violation of human rights. In 1993, the Court declared that manual scavenging is a practice that strikes at the core of human dignity and is therefore unconstitutional.

2. Monitoring and Directives: The Supreme Court has issued various directives to the government and local authorities to take necessary steps for the eradication of manual scavenging. The Court has also set up committees to monitor the implementation of these directives and to ensure the welfare and rehabilitation of manual scavengers.

3. Legislative Actions: The Supreme Court has directed the government to enact specific legislation to deal with the issue of manual scavenging. In response to these directives, the Prohibition of Employment as Manual Scavengers and their Rehabilitation Act, 2013 was enacted, which criminalizes the practice of manual scavenging and provides for the rehabilitation of manual scavengers.

4. Public Interest Litigations: The Supreme Court has entertained several public interest litigations (PILs) filed by various organizations and individuals highlighting the issue of manual scavenging. The Court has used these PILs as a platform to raise awareness about the practice and take necessary actions to eliminate it.

Conclusion:
Contrary to the statement given, the Supreme Court of India has taken significant steps to ban the practice of manual scavenging. Its efforts include judicial pronouncements, monitoring and directives, legislative actions, and entertaining public interest litigations. These actions demonstrate the Court's commitment to addressing the issue and eradicating this dehumanizing practice.