Due to thes reasons Pakistan under general pervez Musharraf is not called democracy:- a) In Pakistan General Parvez Musharraf led a military coup in October, 1999. He overthrew democratically elected government and declared himself the chief executive of the country. (b) Later he changed his designation to president and in 2002 held a referendum (voting). He used dirty tricks and malpractices to win the referendum. (c) In August, 2002 he issued an order to amend the constitution of Pakistan so that he is able to enjoy more powers. The power to take final decision was given to military officers and General Musharraf himself.

Introduction:
Pakistan is a country with a history of military coups and dictatorships. General Pervez Musharraf was one of the military rulers who ruled Pakistan for almost a decade. However, his regime was not considered a democracy despite the holding of general elections during his tenure.

Suppression of media and opposition:
During Musharraf's regime, media censorship was widespread, and critical journalists were harassed and intimidated. The opposition parties were also suppressed, and their leaders were either put under house arrest or detained without trial. The judiciary was also kept under pressure, and the Supreme Court was attacked to prevent it from becoming independent.

Restriction of civil liberties:
Musharraf's regime also imposed restrictions on civil liberties, including freedom of speech and assembly. The government used draconian laws to curb dissent, and human rights abuses were widespread.

Manipulation of elections:
Although Musharraf held general elections during his tenure, they were widely believed to be rigged. The opposition parties were not given a level playing field, and the government used state resources to influence the outcome of the elections.

Lack of accountability:
Musharraf's regime was also marked by a lack of accountability. Corruption was rampant, and the government was accused of misusing public funds for personal gain. The military establishment enjoyed undue influence, and there was a lack of transparency in government dealings.

Conclusion:
In conclusion, despite the holding of general elections, Musharraf's regime was not considered a democracy due to the widespread suppression of media and opposition, restriction of civil liberties, manipulation of elections, and lack of accountability. A true democracy requires the protection of civil liberties, the rule of law, and the accountability of those in power.