CLAT Exam > CLAT Questions > Directions: Read the given passage carefully ... Start Learning for Free
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.
Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.
It is also known that
(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same
(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game
(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level
(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game
(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels
(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earned
(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game
(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level
(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game
(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels
(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earned
How many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?
1. Connor
2. Richard
3. Poppy
4. Mason
1. Connor
2. Richard
3. Poppy
4. Mason
- a)3
- b)2
- c)1
- d)0
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Verified Answer
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question t...
Given,
Richard earned a total of 22.5 points and he was not the first in any level. The only way he can win 22.5 points without being first in any level is if he earned 7.5 in two levels, 5 in one level and 2.5 in another level.
From (2), Connor and Poppy did not win the highest points in the game.
From (6), Sarah also did not win the highest points in the game.
From (4), one of the persons was the first in two levels and this person did not win the highest points. This person must have earned a minimum of 10 + 10 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 25 points in the game. The person who earned the highest points must have earned more than this. From this, we can infer that Richard also cannot be the person who earned the highest points.
Hence, only Mason can be the person who earned the highest points.
From (5), Mason was the first in one level. He is not the third in any level. Also, Richard was the second in two levels (since he earned 7.5 in two levels). Hence, the maximum points that Mason can win = 10 + 7.5 + 7.5 + 2.5 = 27.5 points.
Since Mason has to win more than 25 points, he must have earned 27.5 points. The person who was first in two levels must have earned 25 points (this is the only way for him to have earned less points than Mason).
From (2) and (6), Poppy and Sarah cannot be the person who earned 25 points.
Hence, Connor must be the person who earned 25 points. This is possible if he was the first in two levels and fourth/fifth in two other levels.
From (2), Poppy must have earned 20 points. This is possible only if Poppy was the first in one level, the third in another level and fourth/fifth in two levels (Poppy cannot be the second in any level because Richard and Mason are second in two levels each). The points that Poppy wins in this case = 10 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 20 points.
Sarah must have been the third in two levels and fourth/fifth in two levels. The total points that Sarah earned = 5 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 15 points.
The following table presents the positions of the five persons in the four levels and the total points earned by them in the game.
Connor earned 2.5 points in two levels. In these two levels, Sarah could have got 2.5 points. Hence, we cannot say that Connor definitely earned more than Sarah in at least three levels.
Richard could have earned 2.5 points in the same level that Sarah earned 2.5 points. In the level that Richard earned 5 points, Sarah could have earned only 2.5 points (since two persons could not have earned 5 points). In the other two levels that Richard earned 7.5 points, Sarah would have got less points than Richard. Hence, Richard would have definitely earned higher points than Sarah in three levels. Poppy earned 2.5 points in two levels. In these two levels, Sarah could have earned 2.5 points. Hence, we cannot say that Poppy definitely earned more than Sarah in at least three levels. Mason earned 10 points in one level and 7.5 points in two levels. In all the three levels, Mason would have earned higher points than Sarah. Hence, the given condition is satisfied for two persons, Richard and Mason.
Richard earned a total of 22.5 points and he was not the first in any level. The only way he can win 22.5 points without being first in any level is if he earned 7.5 in two levels, 5 in one level and 2.5 in another level.
From (2), Connor and Poppy did not win the highest points in the game.
From (6), Sarah also did not win the highest points in the game.
From (4), one of the persons was the first in two levels and this person did not win the highest points. This person must have earned a minimum of 10 + 10 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 25 points in the game. The person who earned the highest points must have earned more than this. From this, we can infer that Richard also cannot be the person who earned the highest points.
Hence, only Mason can be the person who earned the highest points.
From (5), Mason was the first in one level. He is not the third in any level. Also, Richard was the second in two levels (since he earned 7.5 in two levels). Hence, the maximum points that Mason can win = 10 + 7.5 + 7.5 + 2.5 = 27.5 points.
Since Mason has to win more than 25 points, he must have earned 27.5 points. The person who was first in two levels must have earned 25 points (this is the only way for him to have earned less points than Mason).
From (2) and (6), Poppy and Sarah cannot be the person who earned 25 points.
Hence, Connor must be the person who earned 25 points. This is possible if he was the first in two levels and fourth/fifth in two other levels.
From (2), Poppy must have earned 20 points. This is possible only if Poppy was the first in one level, the third in another level and fourth/fifth in two levels (Poppy cannot be the second in any level because Richard and Mason are second in two levels each). The points that Poppy wins in this case = 10 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 20 points.
Sarah must have been the third in two levels and fourth/fifth in two levels. The total points that Sarah earned = 5 + 5 + 2.5 + 2.5 = 15 points.
The following table presents the positions of the five persons in the four levels and the total points earned by them in the game.
Connor earned 2.5 points in two levels. In these two levels, Sarah could have got 2.5 points. Hence, we cannot say that Connor definitely earned more than Sarah in at least three levels.
Richard could have earned 2.5 points in the same level that Sarah earned 2.5 points. In the level that Richard earned 5 points, Sarah could have earned only 2.5 points (since two persons could not have earned 5 points). In the other two levels that Richard earned 7.5 points, Sarah would have got less points than Richard. Hence, Richard would have definitely earned higher points than Sarah in three levels. Poppy earned 2.5 points in two levels. In these two levels, Sarah could have earned 2.5 points. Hence, we cannot say that Poppy definitely earned more than Sarah in at least three levels. Mason earned 10 points in one level and 7.5 points in two levels. In all the three levels, Mason would have earned higher points than Sarah. Hence, the given condition is satisfied for two persons, Richard and Mason.
Most Upvoted Answer
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question t...
Understanding the Scenario
In the racing game, five players earned points based on their rankings across four levels. The scoring system rewards positions as follows: 10 points for 1st, 7.5 for 2nd, 5 for 3rd, and 2.5 for the remaining players.
Key Information from the Passage
- No two players had the same total points.
- Connor earned 5 points more than Poppy, and neither was the highest scorer.
- Richard scored a total of 22.5 points, finishing last in one level and not being first in any.
- One player was first in multiple levels but did not have the highest total points.
- Mason was never 3rd, and he was 1st in one level.
- Poppy outscored Sarah.
Analyzing the Points
1. Richard's Points: With a total of 22.5, Richard's placement indicates he likely finished 2nd or 3rd in some levels, given he never ranked 1st.
2. Mason's Performance: Since Mason was 1st in one level and not 3rd in any, his score must be relatively high, which contributes to the idea that he could have earned more than Sarah.
3. Connor and Poppy: Connor's score, being higher than Poppy's, positions them below the highest scorer but still allows for varied rankings that could surpass Sarah's score.
Conclusion
Given that Poppy has more points than Sarah, and Mason is likely to have a significant score along with Connor, the two players (Mason and Poppy) definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three levels.
Thus, the answer is 2 players (Mason and Poppy) who scored higher than Sarah, leading us to option B.
In the racing game, five players earned points based on their rankings across four levels. The scoring system rewards positions as follows: 10 points for 1st, 7.5 for 2nd, 5 for 3rd, and 2.5 for the remaining players.
Key Information from the Passage
- No two players had the same total points.
- Connor earned 5 points more than Poppy, and neither was the highest scorer.
- Richard scored a total of 22.5 points, finishing last in one level and not being first in any.
- One player was first in multiple levels but did not have the highest total points.
- Mason was never 3rd, and he was 1st in one level.
- Poppy outscored Sarah.
Analyzing the Points
1. Richard's Points: With a total of 22.5, Richard's placement indicates he likely finished 2nd or 3rd in some levels, given he never ranked 1st.
2. Mason's Performance: Since Mason was 1st in one level and not 3rd in any, his score must be relatively high, which contributes to the idea that he could have earned more than Sarah.
3. Connor and Poppy: Connor's score, being higher than Poppy's, positions them below the highest scorer but still allows for varied rankings that could surpass Sarah's score.
Conclusion
Given that Poppy has more points than Sarah, and Mason is likely to have a significant score along with Connor, the two players (Mason and Poppy) definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three levels.
Thus, the answer is 2 players (Mason and Poppy) who scored higher than Sarah, leading us to option B.
 | Explore Courses for CLAT exam |  |
Top Courses for CLATView all
Top Courses for CLAT
Question Description
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2026 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for CLAT 2026 is part of CLAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CLAT exam syllabus. Information about Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CLAT 2026 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CLAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CLAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Directions: Read the given passage carefully and answer the question that follows.Connor, Richard, Poppy, Mason and Sarah were playing a racing game which consisted of 4 levels. In each level, the persons who stood first, second and third were awarded 10, 7.5 and 5 points, respectively. The remaining two persons were awarded 2.5 points each.It is also known that(1) the total points earned by no two friends in the game were the same(2) Connor earned 5 more points than Poppy and neither of them earned the highest total points in the game(3) Richard, who was the last in one of the four levels, earned a total of 22.5 points in the game, but he was not the first in any level(4) one of the five persons was the first in more than one levels and he did not win the highest points in the game(5) Mason was not the third in any of the four levels, but he was the first in one of the four levels(6) the points that Poppy earned in the game were more than the points that Sarah earnedHow many of the following definitely earned higher points than Sarah in at least three of the four levels?1. Connor2. Richard3. Poppy4. Masona)3b)2c)1d)0Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CLAT tests.
| Explore Courses for CLAT exam | |
Top Courses for CLAT
Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
