CAT Exam  >  CAT Questions  >  Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together... Start Learning for Free
Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be
[2023]
  • a)
    20
  • b)
    17
  • c)
    16
  • d)
    21
Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Most Upvoted Answer
Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more t...
Let the work done by Rahul, Rakshita, and Gurmeet be a, b, and c units per day, respectively, and the total units of work are W.
Hence, we can say that 7(a + b + c) < W ( Rahul, Rakshita, and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job).
Similarly, we can say that 15(a + c) > W ( Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job)
Now, comparing these two inequalities, we get: 7(a + b + c) < W < 15(a + c)
It is also known that they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job.
Therefore, the total units of work done is: W = 6(a + b + c) + 3b
Hence, we can say that 7(a + b + c) < 6(a + b + c) + 3b < 15(a + c)
Therefore, (a + b + c) < 3b ⇒ a + c < 2b, and 9b < 9(a + c) => b < a + c
⇒ a + b + c < 3b => 7(a + b + c) < 21b , and 15b < 15(a + c)
Hence, The number of days required for b must be in between 15 and 21 (both exclusive).
Hence, the correct option is D
Free Test
Community Answer
Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more t...
Given Data:
- Rahul, Rakshita, and Gurmeet working together would have taken more than 7 days to finish the job.
- Rahul and Gurmeet working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job.
- They all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita working alone for 3 more days to finish the job.

Solution:

Let's assume:
- Rahul's 1 day work = R
- Rakshita's 1 day work = A
- Gurmeet's 1 day work = G

Calculation:
- Rahul, Rakshita, and Gurmeet worked together for 6 days, so their total work done in 6 days = 6(R + A + G)
- Rakshita worked alone for 3 more days, so her total work done in 3 days = 3A
Given that all of them together took more than 7 days to finish the job, we have:
6(R + A + G) + 3A > 1 (Total work)
Given that Rahul and Gurmeet together took less than 15 days to finish the job, we have:
6(R + G) + 3A < 1="" (total="" />
Since Rakshita worked alone for 3 more days, the remaining work would be completed by her alone:
1 - 6(R + A + G) = 3A

Now, we need to solve these equations to find the number of days Rakshita would have taken to finish the job:
- 6(R + A + G) + 3A > 1
- 6(R + G) + 3A < />
- 1 - 6(R + A + G) = 3A
By solving these equations, we can determine that Rakshita would have taken 21 days to finish the job if she had worked alone. Therefore, the correct answer is option 'D' (21 days).
Attention CAT Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed CAT study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in CAT.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Similar CAT Doubts

Directions: Read the following passages carefully and answer the questions that follow.The term "herd behaviour" comes from the behaviour of animals in herds, particularly when they are in a dangerous situation such as escaping a predator. All of the animals band closely together in a group and, in panic mode, move together as a unit. It is very unusual for a member of the herd to stray from the movement of the unit.The term also applies to human behaviour, and it usually describes large numbers of people acting the same way at the same time. It often has a connotation of irrationality, as people's actions are driven by emotion rather than by thinking through a situation. Human herd behaviour can be observed at large-scale demonstrations, riots, strikes, religious gatherings, sports events, and outbreaks of mob violence. When herd behaviour sets in, an individual person's judgment and opinion-forming process shuts down as he or she automatically follows the group's movement and behaviour.Herd behaviour in humans is frequently observed at times of danger and panic; for example, a fire in a building often causes herd behaviour, with people often suspending their individual reasoning and fleeing together in a pack. People in a crisis that requires escape will attempt to move faster than normal, copy the actions of others, interact physically with each other, and ignore alternative strategies in favour of following the mass escape trend.Another commonly cited example of human herd behaviour is the phenomenon of stock market bubbles. Large stock market trends often begin and end with a mass frenzy of buying (bubbles) or selling (crashes). Many observers see these stock market trends as examples of herding behaviour because individuals are driven by emotion rather than reason to "join the crowd"; greed drives mass buying frenzies, and fear drives crashes.A more obvious example of human herd behaviour occurs in dense public crowds or mobs. Crowds that gather because of a grievance or protest can involve herding behaviour that becomes violent, especially if confronted by an opposing racial or ethnic group. The Los Angeles Riots of 1992, New York Draft Riots, and Tulsa Race Riot are infamous examples of herding behaviour that turned violent. Psychologists posit that a "group mind" can overtake a mob and embolden people to act in ways they would not individually, increasing the likelihood that situations become violent.Sporting events can also create herd behaviour on a violent scale. The football hooliganism prevalent in Europe in the 1980s is a well-known example of sports-related herding behaviour and violence. Overzealous fans of football teams often engaged in unruly or destructive behaviour in the name of supporting their team and intimidating the rival team, to the extent that people involved could be badly injured or even killed.Some historians believe that Adolf Hitler purposefully took advantage of herd behaviour psychology by planting a significant number of undercover German officers in the crowds at his speeches. These officers would enthusiastically cheer for Hitler, and the rest of the crowd followed suit, making it seem as if the entire crowd supported Hitler. These speeches would then be broadcast to a larger public audience, magnifying the effect.Herd behaviour does not always have such harmful effects; it can be influential in people's everyday, simple decisions. For example, suppose that a family is walking down the street looking for a restaurant to have dinner. If they pass a restaurant that is empty and one that is relatively crowded with patrons, they are far more likely to choose the crowded one, on the assumption that it's better because there are more people there. Herding can be subtle in this way; it simply involves people's tendency to follow a crowd rather than carve out an individual path in many situations.Choose the sentence/s conveying the same meaning as the sentence given below."When herd behaviour sets in, an individual person's judgment and opinion-forming process shut down as he or she automatically follows the group's movement and behaviour."I. Herd behaviour stops an individual's judgement and opinion-forming process and makes him or her automatically follow the group's behaviour and movement.II. When herd behaviour sets in, an individual person's judgement and opinion-forming process sharpen as he or she automatically follows the group's behaviour and movement.III. An individual person's intuition and opinion-forming process stop working as the herd behaviour sets in, and he or she automatically follows the group's movement and behaviour.

Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? for CAT 2024 is part of CAT preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the CAT exam syllabus. Information about Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for CAT 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for CAT. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for CAT Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Rahul, Rakshita and Gurmeet, working together, would have taken more than 7 days to finish a job. On the other hand, Rahul and Gurmeet, working together would have taken less than 15 days to finish the job. However, they all worked together for 6 days, followed by Rakshita, who worked alone for 3 more days to finish the job. If Rakshita had worked alone on the job then the number of days she would have taken to finish the job, cannot be[2023]a)20b)17c)16d)21Correct answer is option 'D'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice CAT tests.
Explore Courses for CAT exam

Top Courses for CAT

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev