In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

Software Development Exam > Software Development Questions > In India, some people feel that there should ...

In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:

a)
It would be free from corruption
b)
It would not have to face an organised opposition
c)
It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all people
d)
It would be most conscious of its obligations

Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Join for Free

Join for Free

Verified Answer

In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliament...

If the advice of party-less parliamentary democracy is adopted in India, it would have a positive effect on the working of the government as it would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all people. Instead of party-less democracy, the representatives of people should only form the Government which would be more stable and will make decisions that will benefit the citizens of the country, hence promoting every aspect of development. This avoids the growing corruption and other ill-practices employed by the various party leaders.

View all questions of this test

View all answers Start learning for free

Explore Courses for Software Development exam

Similar Software Development Doubts

Read the given passage and answer the following questions.The concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) has gained traction in recent years as a radical approach to redefining societal welfare and addressing income inequality. UBI proposes that every citizen, regardless of employment status, wealth, or social standing, receives a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government. This revolutionary idea challenges traditional welfare systems, which are often conditional, bureaucratic, and stigmatizing to recipients. By suggesting a model that is universal and unconditional, UBI raises intriguing moral and rights-based questions about societal obligations, individual freedom, and the nature of social justice.Advocates argue that UBI embodies a recognition of basic human rights, ensuring that every person has the means to secure a minimum standard of living. In a world where technological advancement threatens to disrupt labor markets and exacerbate unemployment, UBI is seen as a tool to safeguard individuals against economic uncertainties, granting them the freedom to pursue education, engage in creative endeavors, or care for family members without the fear of extreme poverty.Critics, however, question the morality of providing individuals with income unlinked from work, suggesting it could undermine the work ethic and create disincentives for productive engagement in society. They also raise concerns about the financial sustainability of such programs and the potential for inflationary effects that could erode the actual value of the income provided.The UBI debate, therefore, not only examines the mechanics of implementing such a program but also delves into deeper philosophical inquiries about what societies owe their members, the role of government in securing economic stability, and the definitions of freedom and dignity in the modern world.Which statement is accurate regarding the UBI debate?

View answer

Read the given passage and answer the following questions.The concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) has gained traction in recent years as a radical approach to redefining societal welfare and addressing income inequality. UBI proposes that every citizen, regardless of employment status, wealth, or social standing, receives a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government. This revolutionary idea challenges traditional welfare systems, which are often conditional, bureaucratic, and stigmatizing to recipients. By suggesting a model that is universal and unconditional, UBI raises intriguing moral and rights-based questions about societal obligations, individual freedom, and the nature of social justice.Advocates argue that UBI embodies a recognition of basic human rights, ensuring that every person has the means to secure a minimum standard of living. In a world where technological advancement threatens to disrupt labor markets and exacerbate unemployment, UBI is seen as a tool to safeguard individuals against economic uncertainties, granting them the freedom to pursue education, engage in creative endeavors, or care for family members without the fear of extreme poverty.Critics, however, question the morality of providing individuals with income unlinked from work, suggesting it could undermine the work ethic and create disincentives for productive engagement in society. They also raise concerns about the financial sustainability of such programs and the potential for inflationary effects that could erode the actual value of the income provided.The UBI debate, therefore, not only examines the mechanics of implementing such a program but also delves into deeper philosophical inquiries about what societies owe their members, the role of government in securing economic stability, and the definitions of freedom and dignity in the modern world.Identify the part of speech for the word "unconditional" as used in the passage.

View answer

Read the given passage and answer the following questions.The concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) has gained traction in recent years as a radical approach to redefining societal welfare and addressing income inequality. UBI proposes that every citizen, regardless of employment status, wealth, or social standing, receives a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government. This revolutionary idea challenges traditional welfare systems, which are often conditional, bureaucratic, and stigmatizing to recipients. By suggesting a model that is universal and unconditional, UBI raises intriguing moral and rights-based questions about societal obligations, individual freedom, and the nature of social justice.Advocates argue that UBI embodies a recognition of basic human rights, ensuring that every person has the means to secure a minimum standard of living. In a world where technological advancement threatens to disrupt labor markets and exacerbate unemployment, UBI is seen as a tool to safeguard individuals against economic uncertainties, granting them the freedom to pursue education, engage in creative endeavors, or care for family members without the fear of extreme poverty.Critics, however, question the morality of providing individuals with income unlinked from work, suggesting it could undermine the work ethic and create disincentives for productive engagement in society. They also raise concerns about the financial sustainability of such programs and the potential for inflationary effects that could erode the actual value of the income provided.The UBI debate, therefore, not only examines the mechanics of implementing such a program but also delves into deeper philosophical inquiries about what societies owe their members, the role of government in securing economic stability, and the definitions of freedom and dignity in the modern world.The correct answer is 'Which word is an antonym of "safeguard" as used in the passage?

View answer

Read the given passage and answer the following questions.The concept of Universal Basic Income (UBI) has gained traction in recent years as a radical approach to redefining societal welfare and addressing income inequality. UBI proposes that every citizen, regardless of employment status, wealth, or social standing, receives a regular, unconditional sum of money from the government. This revolutionary idea challenges traditional welfare systems, which are often conditional, bureaucratic, and stigmatizing to recipients. By suggesting a model that is universal and unconditional, UBI raises intriguing moral and rights-based questions about societal obligations, individual freedom, and the nature of social justice.Advocates argue that UBI embodies a recognition of basic human rights, ensuring that every person has the means to secure a minimum standard of living. In a world where technological advancement threatens to disrupt labor markets and exacerbate unemployment, UBI is seen as a tool to safeguard individuals against economic uncertainties, granting them the freedom to pursue education, engage in creative endeavors, or care for family members without the fear of extreme poverty.Critics, however, question the morality of providing individuals with income unlinked from work, suggesting it could undermine the work ethic and create disincentives for productive engagement in society. They also raise concerns about the financial sustainability of such programs and the potential for inflationary effects that could erode the actual value of the income provided.The UBI debate, therefore, not only examines the mechanics of implementing such a program but also delves into deeper philosophical inquiries about what societies owe their members, the role of government in securing economic stability, and the definitions of freedom and dignity in the modern world.What type of clause is '....which are often conditional, bureaucratic, and stigmatizing to recipients'?

View answer

Which of the following statements about the Foreign Trade Policy 2023 is correct?

View answer

Top Courses for Software DevelopmentView all

How to become an Expert of MS Excel

ChatGPT for Everything: How to Use ChatGPT?

Basics of Python

GATE Computer Science Engineering(CSE) 2025 Mock Test Series

Company Wise Preparation

Top Courses for Software Development

View all

In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Software Development 2025 is part of Software Development preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Software Development exam syllabus. Information about In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Software Development 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Software Development. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Software Development Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice In India, some people feel that there should be a partyless parliamentary democracy. If this advice is accepted and implemented its effect on the working of the Government would be that:a)It would be free from corruptionb)It would not have to face an organised oppositionc)It would work on clear-cut policy lines in the interests of all peopled)It would be most conscious of its obligationsCorrect answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Software Development tests.

Explore Courses for Software Development exam