What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

EduRev

All Courses

Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity

Open App

UGC NET Exam > UGC NET Questions > What is the fundamental difference between in...

Join the Discussion on the App

What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?

a)
Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.
b)
Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.
c)
Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.
d)
Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.

Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

FREE This question is part of

Test: Inductive & Deductive Reasoning

Attempt Test

Attempt this Test

Most Upvoted Answer

What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and ded...

Inductive reasoning utilizes a set of specific observations to arrive at a comprehensive conclusion, contrasting with deductive reasoning, which starts with broader premises to prove a specific conclusion. Inductive reasoning is focused on making predictions, creating generalizations, and analyzing cause and effect based on the likelihood that the conclusion fits the premises. On the other hand, deductive reasoning aims to demonstrate that the conclusion necessarily follows from the given premises.

Answered by JKL Classes · View profile

Attention UGC NET Students!

To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed UGC NET study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in UGC NET.

UGC NET Mock Test Series 2024

UGC NET Past Year Papers

Crash Course for UGC NET Education

Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude for UGC NET

View all answers Start learning for free

< Previous Question Next Question >

Explore Courses for UGC NET exam

Similar UGC NET Doubts

How does deductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?

View answer

How does abductive reasoning differ from inductive reasoning?

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the question.The phrase “What is it like?“ stands for a fundamental thought process. How does one go about observing and reporting on things and events that occupy segments of earth space? Of all the infinite variety of phenomena on the face of the earth, how does one decide what phenomena to observe? There is no such thing as a complete description of the earth or any part of it, for every microscopic point on the earth’s surface differs from every other such point. Experience shows that the things observed are already familiar, because they are like phenomena that occur at home or because they resemble the abstract images and models developed in the human mind.How are abstract images formed? Humans alone among the animals possess language; their words symbolise not only specific things but also mental images of classes of things. People can remember what they have seen or experienced because they attach a word symbol to them.During the long record of our efforts to gain more and more knowledge about the face of the earth as the human habitat, there has been a continuing interplay between things and events. The direct observation through the senses is described as a percept; the mental image is described as a concept. Percepts are what some people describe as reality, in contrast to mental images, which are theoretical, implying that they are not real.The relation of Percept to Concept is not as simple as the definition implies. It is now quite clear that people of different cultures or even individuals in the same culture develop different mental images of reality and what they perceive is a reflection of these preconceptions. The direct observation of things and events on the face of the earth is so clearly a function of the mental images of the mind of the observer that the whole idea of reality must be reconsidered.Concepts determine what the observer perceives, yet concepts are derived from the generalisations of previous percepts. What happens is that the educated observer is taught to accept a set of concepts and then he/she sharpens or changes these concepts during a professional career. In any one field of scholarship, professional opinion at one time determines what concepts and procedures are acceptable, and these form a kind of model of scholarly behaviour.Q.According to the passage, human beings have mostly in mind

View answer

Directions: Read the following passage carefully and answer the question.The phrase “What is it like?“ stands for a fundamental thought process. How does one go about observing and reporting on things and events that occupy segments of earth space? Of all the infinite variety of phenomena on the face of the earth, how does one decide what phenomena to observe? There is no such thing as a complete description of the earth or any part of it, for every microscopic point on the earth’s surface differs from every other such point. Experience shows that the things observed are already familiar, because they are like phenomena that occur at home or because they resemble the abstract images and models developed in the human mind.How are abstract images formed? Humans alone among the animals possess language; their words symbolise not only specific things but also mental images of classes of things. People can remember what they have seen or experienced because they attach a word symbol to them.During the long record of our efforts to gain more and more knowledge about the face of the earth as the human habitat, there has been a continuing interplay between things and events. The direct observation through the senses is described as a percept; the mental image is described as a concept. Percepts are what some people describe as reality, in contrast to mental images, which are theoretical, implying that they are not real.The relation of Percept to Concept is not as simple as the definition implies. It is now quite clear that people of different cultures or even individuals in the same culture develop different mental images of reality and what they perceive is a reflection of these preconceptions. The direct observation of things and events on the face of the earth is so clearly a function of the mental images of the mind of the observer that the whole idea of reality must be reconsidered.Concepts determine what the observer perceives, yet concepts are derived from the generalisations of previous percepts. What happens is that the educated observer is taught to accept a set of concepts and then he/she sharpens or changes these concepts during a professional career. In any one field of scholarship, professional opinion at one time determines what concepts and procedures are acceptable, and these form a kind of model of scholarly behaviour.Q.The relation of Percept to Concept is

View answer

Consider a dataset A with 55 distinct observations. A new dataset C is created by adding 2023 to all observations in dataset A. Which of the following is NOT true?

View answer

Top Courses for UGC NETView all

UGC NET Mock Test Series 2024

UGC NET Past Year Papers

Crash Course for UGC NET Education

Mathematical Reasoning and Aptitude for UGC NET

Teaching Aptitude for Teaching Exam

Top Courses for UGC NET

View all

What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Share with a Friend

Answer this doubt

Question Description
What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? for UGC NET 2025 is part of UGC NET preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the UGC NET exam syllabus. Information about What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for UGC NET 2025 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?.

Solutions for What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for UGC NET. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for UGC NET Exam by signing up for free.

Here you can find the meaning of What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice What is the fundamental difference between inductive reasoning and deductive reasoning?a) Inductive reasoning starts with specific observations to reach a comprehensive conclusion, while deductive reasoning employs premises to prove a conclusion.b) Inductive reasoning begins with a general premise to reach a specific conclusion, while deductive reasoning uses specific observations to make a broad conclusion.c) Inductive reasoning aims to prove a conclusion, while deductive reasoning is intended to predict a conclusion.d) Inductive reasoning always leads to a definite answer, while deductive reasoning provides a probable explanation.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice UGC NET tests.

Explore Courses for UGC NET exam