Consequences of all three organs of government being controlled by the same group
The concentration of power in one group controlling all three organs of the government - the legislative, executive, and judiciary branches - can lead to a number of negative consequences for a country and its citizens.

1. Lack of checks and balances
When one group controls all three organs of government, there is no separation of powers to provide checks and balances. This can result in abuse of power, corruption, and erosion of democratic principles.

2. Limited accountability
Without separate branches of government holding each other accountable, the group in control can act with impunity. This can lead to a lack of transparency and accountability, making it difficult for citizens to hold their leaders responsible for their actions.

3. Suppression of dissent
A group that controls all three branches of government may suppress dissent and limit freedom of speech and expression. This can lead to a lack of political pluralism and a stifling of democratic debate and discourse.

Real-life examples
One real-life example of all three branches of government being controlled by the same group is in countries with authoritarian regimes, where the ruling party or leader exerts control over the legislature, executive, and judiciary. This concentration of power can result in human rights abuses, lack of political freedoms, and widespread corruption.
In such situations, citizens often have limited avenues for recourse and may face repression if they speak out against the ruling group. This can lead to a climate of fear and intimidation, where dissent is not tolerated and opposition voices are silenced.
Overall, the concentration of power in one group controlling all three organs of government is a dangerous situation that can have far-reaching negative consequences for a country and its people. It is essential to uphold the principles of separation of powers and checks and balances to ensure the protection of democracy and the rule of law.