Explain: The problem with the periodisation of Indian history that James mill offers?

Question

Answer

James mill was a stupid He divided the Indian history in 3 parts Islamic Hindu nd British. But where are Buddhism and jaisninsm because buddihissm and jaisninsm started from India so this is the main highlighted point that James mill poreidisation is totally baseless

Answer

James mill periodisation was not accepted as it showed only the characters of the rulers , their life etc. if it would have been accepted then there would be an ignorance towards the life of common people at that time . The periodisation was done as: hindu, muslim, british. There was one more problem for what it could not be divided like that because religion as a rule could not be chosen and if it would have been accepted then the rulers of other religions would get inferior.

Answer

In 1817 James mill offered a highly sustainable periodization but unfortunately his periodization came to be a great failure he stated that Hindu Muslim British Now u can just name the period by looking at the religion of the rulers at that time..They need a proper periodization but James mill can't offer that so his periodization was full of failure.

Answer

The Problem with the Periodisation of Indian History that James Mill Offers

James Mill was a British historian who wrote extensively about India, and his work 'The History of British India' is considered one of the most influential books on Indian history. However, his periodisation of Indian history has been widely criticised for its Eurocentric bias and lack of understanding of Indian culture and traditions.

Eurocentric Bias

One of the main problems with James Mill's periodisation of Indian history is that it is based on a Eurocentric perspective. Mill divided Indian history into three periods: the Hindu period, the Muslim period, and the British period. This division is based on the idea that India was stagnant and unchanging until the arrival of the Muslims and the British, who brought progress and development to the country. This view completely ignores the rich and complex history of India before the arrival of these foreign powers.

Lack of Understanding of Indian Culture and Traditions

Another problem with James Mill's periodisation of Indian history is that it shows a lack of understanding of Indian culture and traditions. Mill believed that India was a primitive and backward society, and that its culture and traditions were obstacles to progress and development. He saw the British as the civilising force that would bring modernity and enlightenment to India.

This Eurocentric view of Indian culture and traditions has been criticised by many historians, who argue that India has a rich and diverse culture that has made significant contributions to world civilisation. They point out that India has a long history of science, mathematics, medicine, and philosophy, and that many of the ideas that we take for granted today originated in India.

Conclusion

James Mill's periodisation of Indian history has been widely criticised for its Eurocentric bias and lack of understanding of Indian culture and traditions. While his work has had a significant influence on the study of Indian history, it is important to recognise its limitations and to strive for a more nuanced and complex understanding of India's rich and diverse history.

Top Courses for Class 8View all

Science Class 8

Mathematics (Maths) Class 8

Social Studies (SST) Class 8

English Class 8

Improve Your Calculations: Vedic Maths (English)

Top Courses for Class 8

Top Courses for Class 8

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

Class 8 Study Material

Class 8 Subjects

Competitive Examinations for Class 8

NCERT Solutions

Reference Books for Class 8

Other Popular Exams

Company