What condition is NOT required for a resource to be considered economically feasible?a)It must be abundant in nature.b)It must be affordable to use.c)It must respect cultural beliefs.d)It must be easy to obtain.Correct answer is option 'A'. Can you explain this answer?

Question

Answer

A resource does not need to be abundant; even scarce resources can be economically feasible if they can be used profitably and affordably.

Answer

Understanding Economic Feasibility
Economic feasibility of a resource refers to its viability in terms of cost, accessibility, and social acceptance. To determine if a resource is economically feasible, several conditions must be met, but abundance in nature is not one of them.
Key Conditions for Economic Feasibility

Must be Affordable to Use: The resource should be within a cost range that allows it to be utilized without excessive financial burden on users. If the cost is too high, even abundant resources may not be considered feasible.
Must Respect Cultural Beliefs: The use of resources should align with the values and beliefs of the communities involved. If a resource violates cultural norms, its acceptance and use may be hindered, impacting its feasibility.
Must be Easy to Obtain: Accessibility is crucial. A resource that is difficult to obtain or requires excessive labor or technology will diminish its economic feasibility, regardless of its availability in nature.

Why Abundance is Not Required
While abundance can enhance the attractiveness of a resource, it does not ensure economic feasibility. A resource can be plentiful but still impractical to use if:

It is too expensive to extract or process.
It conflicts with local cultural practices.
It poses logistical challenges in obtaining or utilizing it.

Thus, while abundance might be advantageous, it is not a necessary condition for a resource to be considered economically feasible. Economic viability ultimately hinges on affordability, accessibility, and social acceptance.

Answer

Ok thanks 👍

Answer

A) It must be abundant in nature because a resource doesn't have to be everywhere for us to use it profitably. In fact, some of our most 'economically feasible' resources are quite rare!
Here is a breakdown of why abundance isn't a requirement, while the other factors are:
1. Why Abundance (a) is NOT required
Economic feasibility is about the balance between cost and value.
Gold and Diamonds: These are incredibly scarce (the opposite of abundant), yet they are highly feasible resources because their market value is much higher than the cost of mining them.
Scarcity creates value: Often, the rarer a resource is, the more 'feasible' it becomes to develop expensive technology to go get it.
2. Why the other options ARE required
To classify something as a 'resource' in a formal sense, it usually needs to meet these criteria:
Affordability (b): If it costs $100 to extract 1kg of iron, but you can only sell that iron for $50, it is not economically feasible. You'd go out of business!
Cultural Acceptance (c): Even if a resource is cheap and easy to get, if using it violates the beliefs or laws of the local community (e.g., mining in a sacred mountain), it faces social barriers that make it 'unfeasible' to develop.
Ease of Access/Technology (d): We must have the 'technological accessibility' to reach it. If a resource is buried 50 miles under the Earth's crust where no drill can reach, it isn't a feasible resource yet.

Top Courses for CTET & State TETView all

CTET (Central Teacher Eligibility Test) Mock Test Series 2026

Child Development and Pedagogy for CTET Preparation

How To Study For CTET

CTET Previous Year Question Papers

Social Studies & Pedagogy Paper 2 for CTET & TET Exams

Top Courses for CTET & State TET

Top Courses for CTET & State TET

Related Content

Main Subjects

Revision

Teaching Exams

Competitive Exams

Schools