Class 9 Exam  >  Class 9 Questions  >  Explain the statement "there should be suffic... Start Learning for Free
Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections?
Verified Answer
Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal ...
This statement  is  elections must be held correctly and the existing govt. don't use unfair means , opposition is required .
it criticizes the existing govt. for its failures , thus it makes a balance in democracy and power do not remains in one hand .

This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Class 9 courses
Most Upvoted Answer
Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal ...
Introduction:

Before elections take place, it is crucial to establish sufficient rules for normal political activity. These rules serve as a framework to ensure fair and transparent elections, prevent the misuse of power, and protect the democratic process. Without such rules, the electoral system can be vulnerable to manipulation, corruption, and the erosion of public trust.

Importance of Sufficient Rules:

1. Fairness and Equality: Sufficient rules ensure that all political parties and candidates have an equal opportunity to participate in the electoral process. This promotes fairness and prevents any particular group from dominating the political landscape.

2. Transparency: Rules provide guidelines for campaign financing, disclosure of political contributions, and reporting requirements. These measures help to maintain transparency and prevent illicit activities such as bribery, money laundering, or the use of illegal funds during elections.

3. Preventing Electoral Fraud: Sufficient rules help to prevent electoral fraud by establishing procedures for voter registration, ballot counting, and result verification. These rules ensure that each vote is counted accurately and minimize the risk of tampering or manipulation.

4. Public Confidence: Well-defined rules contribute to building public confidence in the electoral process. When people perceive the elections to be fair and free from manipulation, they are more likely to trust the outcomes and actively participate in the democratic process.

5. Protection of Civil Liberties: Rules safeguard the rights and liberties of individuals involved in the political process. They ensure freedom of expression, assembly, and association, allowing citizens to voice their opinions, engage in political activities, and form political parties without fear of persecution or discrimination.

6. Preventing Political Violence: Clear rules help prevent political violence by establishing boundaries for political campaigns and public gatherings. They prohibit hate speech, incitement to violence, and any form of intimidation or harassment, fostering a peaceful environment during the electoral period.

7. Accountability: Rules hold political parties and candidates accountable for their actions during the campaign period. They establish mechanisms for reporting and addressing violations, allowing for appropriate consequences when rules are breached.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, having sufficient rules for normal political activity before elections is essential for the smooth functioning of a democratic system. These rules promote fairness, transparency, and accountability, ensuring that elections are conducted in a manner that upholds the principles of democracy and protects the rights of citizens. By establishing a level playing field and preventing misconduct, these rules contribute to the legitimacy and integrity of the electoral process.
Community Answer
Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal ...
Mm4..mmh J crrB r. m r denim my Dr 6 .4:-P*\0/*}:‑) vi
Attention Class 9 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 9 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 9.
Explore Courses for Class 9 exam

Similar Class 9 Doubts

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Assertion (

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Does the given source explain the significance of which feature of democracy?

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Which of the following makes Zimbabwe undemocratic

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.What does the example of Zimbabwe show?

Question No. 53 to 58 are based on the given text. Read the text carefully and answer the questions:Zimbabwe attained independence from White minority rule in 1980. Since then the country has been ruled by ZANU-PF, the party that led the freedom struggle. Its leader, Robert Mugabe, ruled the country since independence. Elections were held regularly and always won by ZANU-PF. President Mugabe was popular but also used unfair practices in elections. Over the years his government changed the constitution several times to increase the powers of the President and make him less accountable.Opposition party workers were harassed and their meetings disrupted. Public protests and demonstrations against the government were declared illegal. There was a law that limited the right to criticise the President. Television and radio were controlled by the government and gave only the ruling party’s version. There were independent newspapers but the government harassed those journalists who went against it. The government ignored some court judgments that went against it and pressurised judges. He was forced out of office in 2017. The example of Zimbabwe shows thatpopular approval of the rulers is necessary for a democracy, but it is not sufficient. Popular governments can be undemocratic. Popular leaders can be autocratic. If we wish to assess a democracy, it is important to look at the elections. But it is equally important to look before and after the elections. There should be sufficient room for normal political activity, including political opposition, in the period before elections. This requires that the state should respect some basic rights of the citizen. They should be free to think, to have opinions, to express these in public, to form associations, to protest and take other political actions. Everyone should be equal in the eyes of law. These rights must be protected by an independent judiciary whose orders are obeyed by everyone.Q.Which of these features is/are necessary to provide the basic rights to the citizens?

Top Courses for Class 9

Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections?
Question Description
Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? for Class 9 2024 is part of Class 9 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 9 exam syllabus. Information about Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? covers all topics & solutions for Class 9 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections?.
Solutions for Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 9. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 9 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections?, a detailed solution for Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? has been provided alongside types of Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Explain the statement "there should be sufficient rule for the normal political activity before the elections? tests, examples and also practice Class 9 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 9 exam

Top Courses for Class 9

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev