Why Pakistan under general pervej Musharraf of can not be called democracy?

Question

Answer

We can not say that that is democracy because the people in democracy chose there representative but there they can chose but representative have not in power all power is in hand of army so this is not called democracy .

Answer

One of the features of democracy is that the final decision making power must rest with those elected by the people . and in case of Pakistan under Musharraf , due to the legal framework order this feature was not practised as the powers rested with army officials and Musharraf and none of them were elected by people. Hence,Pakistan under Musharraf cannot be called democracy.

Answer

Jammu and Kashmir

Answer

Pakistan under general Musharraf can not be called democratic because, people elected their representatives by election which were held regularly but the decisions were not taken by them. The final decision is with general Musharraf and not with the elected representatives

Answer

Introduction:

Under the leadership of General Pervez Musharraf, Pakistan cannot be called a democracy due to several reasons. Despite the facade of democratic processes, the Musharraf regime was characterized by authoritarianism, suppression of civil liberties, and manipulation of political institutions.

Lack of Political Freedom:

One of the key indicators of a democracy is the presence of political freedom, including the right to freely express opinions, form political parties, and participate in elections. However, during Musharraf's rule, these fundamental democratic rights were severely curtailed.

- Restrictions on Freedom of Expression: Musharraf's regime imposed strict censorship on the media, limiting the ability of journalists to criticize the government or report on sensitive issues. This led to a stifling of dissenting voices and a lack of transparency in governance.
- Suppression of Opposition: The Musharraf regime cracked down on political opponents, arresting and detaining opposition leaders, and suppressing their ability to mobilize support. This created an environment of fear and intimidation, undermining the democratic process.
- Manipulation of Elections: Musharraf manipulated the electoral process to maintain his grip on power. The 2002 elections were marred by allegations of rigging and the exclusion of key opposition figures, ensuring a weakened opposition in the parliament.

Lack of Accountability:

A crucial element of democracy is the presence of strong institutions that ensure accountability and transparency in governance. However, under Musharraf, the accountability mechanisms were weakened, allowing for unchecked power and corruption.

- Weakening of Judiciary: Musharraf undermined the independence of the judiciary by dismissing and replacing judges who were seen as a threat to his regime. This weakened the ability of the judiciary to hold the government accountable and protect citizens' rights.
- Lack of Transparency: The Musharraf regime lacked transparency in decision-making processes, with important policies being formulated behind closed doors without public consultation. This lack of transparency eroded trust in the government and hindered democratic accountability.

Military Dominance:

Another factor that undermined democracy in Pakistan under Musharraf was the dominance of the military in political affairs. Musharraf himself was a military general who came to power through a coup, and this military influence permeated throughout his regime.

- Role of Army in Governance: The military played a significant role in decision-making processes, with military officials occupying key positions in the government. This military dominance undermined civilian institutions and limited the scope for democratic governance.
- Suppression of Civil Society: The Musharraf regime also suppressed civil society organizations, making it difficult for them to operate independently and advocate for democratic reforms. This further consolidated the power of the military and limited the space for democratic discourse.

Conclusion:

In conclusion, Pakistan under General Pervez Musharraf cannot be called a democracy due to the lack of political freedom, accountability, and the dominance of the military in political affairs. Despite the appearance of democratic processes, the regime was characterized by authoritarianism and a suppression of civil liberties.

Similar Class 9 Doubts

Why Pakistan under general pervez Musharraf in not called democracy? SST?

Why is Pakistan under general pra not called a democracy?

Top Courses for Class 9View all

Science Class 9

Social Studies (SST) Class 9

Mathematics (Maths) Class 9

English Grammar Advanced

English Class 9

Top Courses for Class 9

Top Courses for Class 9

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

Class 9 Study Material

Class 9 Subjects

Competitive Examinations for Class 9

NCERT Books

NCERT Solutions

Reference Books for Class 9

Other Popular Exams

Company