In what ways was Pataliputra different from Mohenjodaro?
Difference between Pataliputra and Mohenjodaro: Pataliputra: This is a large and beautiful city. It is surrounded by a massive wall. It has 570 towers and 64 gates. The houses, of two and three storeys, are built of wood and mud brick. The king's palace is also of wood, and decorated with stone carvings. It is surrounded with gardens and enclosures for keeping birds." Mohenjodaro: There was no king, hence there was no palace. The city was divided into two parts—the citadel and the surrounding area. The houses were single storeyed and made of bricks.
This question is part of UPSC exam. View all Class 6 courses
In what ways was Pataliputra different from Mohenjodaro?
Pataliputra vs Mohenjodaro
Introduction:
Pataliputra and Mohenjodaro are two ancient cities that existed in different time periods and geographical locations. While both cities played significant roles in the history of the Indian subcontinent, they differed in various aspects, including their time of existence, urban planning, cultural practices, and political significance.
Time of Existence:
- Mohenjodaro: It was a major urban center of the Indus Valley Civilization, which flourished around 2600-1900 BCE.
- Pataliputra: It emerged as a prominent city during the Mauryan Empire around the 5th century BCE and continued to be a significant city during the Gupta Empire in the 4th century CE.
Urban Planning:
- Mohenjodaro: The city was meticulously planned and had advanced sanitation systems, including a complex network of underground drains and a sophisticated water supply system. The buildings were made of baked bricks and were constructed on raised platforms.
- Pataliputra: The city was strategically located near the confluence of the Ganges and Son rivers. It had well-organized streets, residential areas, and public buildings. The city's fortifications were strengthened with wooden palisades and moats.
Cultural Practices:
- Mohenjodaro: The people of Mohenjodaro were proficient in crafts such as pottery, metallurgy, and bead-making. They had a system of writing, which remains undeciphered to this day. The city also had a well-developed trade network.
- Pataliputra: Pataliputra was known as a center of learning and attracted scholars from various parts of the world. It was the birthplace of various schools of philosophy, including Buddhism and Jainism. The city was also renowned for its art and architecture.
Political Significance:
- Mohenjodaro: The city did not have a centralized political authority but instead had a system of local governance. The absence of monumental structures suggests a relatively egalitarian society.
- Pataliputra: Pataliputra served as the capital of several powerful empires, including the Mauryan and Gupta empires. It was a hub of political, economic, and cultural activities and exerted significant influence over the Indian subcontinent.
Conclusion:
In summary, Pataliputra and Mohenjodaro were distinct ancient cities with their own unique characteristics. While Mohenjodaro was an advanced city of the Indus Valley Civilization, Pataliputra emerged as a prominent city during the Mauryan and Gupta empires. The two cities differed in terms of their time of existence, urban planning, cultural practices, and political significance. Understanding the differences between these two cities helps provide insights into the diverse historical and cultural developments of the Indian subcontinent.
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 6 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 6.