How different tribal groups described the Dikus
- Colonial rulers as 'Dikus':
- The tribal groups often referred to the colonial rulers as 'Dikus', a term that signifies outsiders or oppressors.
- They saw the colonial rulers as exploiters who took away their lands, forests, and resources without any regard for their rights or well-being.
- Exploitative nature of Dikus:
- The tribal groups described the Dikus as exploiters who enforced harsh laws and imposed heavy taxes on them.
- They felt marginalized and oppressed by the Dikus, who controlled their lives and exploited their resources for their own benefit.
- Impact on tribal way of life:
- The Dikus' presence disrupted the traditional way of life of the tribal communities, leading to loss of land, livelihoods, and cultural practices.
- The tribes felt a sense of loss and alienation as their way of life was threatened by the intrusion of the Dikus.
- Struggle against the Dikus:
- Many tribal groups resisted the Dikus' presence through various forms of protest and rebellion.
- They fought to protect their lands, forests, and rights from the encroachment of the Dikus, showcasing a strong sense of unity and solidarity among themselves.
- Aspirations for a golden age:
- Despite the hardships faced due to the Dikus, the tribal groups held onto a vision of a golden age where they would regain their lost lands and freedom.
- They hoped for a future where they could live in harmony with nature, free from the oppression of the Dikus, and reclaim their cultural heritage and autonomy.