All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 11 Exam  >  Class 11 Questions  >  Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer c... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Atomic no. is the base of -
(i) Lother meyer curve
(ii) Newland octave rule
(iii) Modern periodic table
(iv) Doeberiener triad rule
(v) Long form of periodic table
  • a)
    (i), (ii), (iv)
  • b)
    (iii), (v)
  • c)
    (i), (iv)
  • d)
    (i), (iii), (v)
Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave r...
Modern periodic table and long form of periodic table are same. Both are based on atomic number rather than atomic mass.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave r...
Moseley explain modern periodic table by atomic number and atomic number also prepared long form of periodic table .
Free Test
FREE
Start Free Test
Start Free Test
Community Answer
Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave r...
Atomic number or proton number is the base of modern periodic table which is also known as long form of periodic table
Attention Class 11 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 11 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 11.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Class 11 exam

Similar Class 11 Doubts

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In Greek, “atom” means

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In ancient Greece, who is best known for his atomic hypothesis?

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. Which of the followings was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert?

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In which biography the size of the atoms was estimated close to the modern estimate

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. The kinds of atoms which were propounded in ancient India are

Top Courses for Class 11View all

Top Courses for Class 11

Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 11 2024 is part of Class 11 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 11 exam syllabus. Information about Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 11 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 11. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 11 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Atomic no. is the base of -(i) Lother meyer curve(ii) Newland octave rule(iii) Modern periodic table(iv) Doeberiener triad rule(v) Long form of periodic tablea)(i), (ii), (iv)b)(iii), (v)c)(i), (iv)d)(i), (iii), (v)Correct answer is option 'B'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 11 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 11 exam

Top Courses for Class 11

Explore Courses
Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Follow Us
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup