All Courses
Explore Courses UPSC Exam UPSC Test Series Free Notes EduRev Infinity Get the App Login Join for Free
Sign in Open App
Class 11 Exam  >  Class 11 Questions  >  Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic... Start Learning for Free
SaveJoin the Discussion on the App
Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.
The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.
If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by mass
of X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.
  • a)
    14
  • b)
    42
  • c)
    70
  • d)
    84
Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
FREE This question is part of
Download PDF Attempt Test
Download PDF Attempt this Test
Verified Answer
Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form...
In B, 32 parts of x combine with y=84 parts16 parts of x will combine with y =42parts
Now, the number of parts of x in both B and C is of equal masses of y which combine with a fixed mass of x in B and C in the ratio 3:5mass of y in Bmass of y in C =3542 partsmass of y in C=35
mass of y in C=53x42 =70 partsIn B, 32 parts of x combine with y=84 parts16 parts of x will combine with y =42parts
Now, the number of parts of x in both B and C is of equal masses of y which combine with a fixed mass of x in B and C in the ratio 3:5mass of y in Bmass of y in C =3542 partsmass of y in C=35mass of y in C=53x42 =70 parts



Hence option C is correct.
View all questions of this test
Most Upvoted Answer
Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form...
In B, 32 parts of x combine with y=84 parts
16 parts of x will combine with y =42parts
Now, the number of parts of x in both B and C is of equal masses of y which combine with a fixed mass of x in B and C in the ratio 3:5
Attention Class 11 Students!
To make sure you are not studying endlessly, EduRev has designed Class 11 study material, with Structured Courses, Videos, & Test Series. Plus get personalized analysis, doubt solving and improvement plans to achieve a great score in Class 11.
< Previous Question Next Question >
Explore Courses for Class 11 exam

Similar Class 11 Doubts

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In Greek, “atom” means

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In ancient Greece, who is best known for his atomic hypothesis?

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. Which of the followings was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert?

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. The kinds of atoms which were propounded in ancient India are

Attempt All sub parts from each question.Atomic Hypothesis in Ancient India and Greece Though John Dalton is credited with the introduction of atomic view point in modern science, scholars in ancient India and Greece conjectured long before the existence of atoms and molecules. In the Vaisheshika school of thought in India founded by Kanada (Sixth century B.C.) the atomic picture was developed in considerable detail. Atoms were thought to be eternal, indivisible, infinitesimal and ultimate parts of matter. It was argued that if matter could be subdivided without an end, there would be no difference between a mustard seed and the Meru mountain. The four kinds of atoms (Paramanu — Sanskrit word for the smallest particl e) postulated were Bhoomi (Earth), Ap (water), Tejas (fire) and Vayu (air) that have characteristic mass and other attributes, we re propounded. Akasa (space) was thought to have no atomic structure and was continuous and inert. Atoms combine to form different molecules (e.g. two atoms combine to form a diatomic molecule dvyanuka, three atoms form a tryanuka or a triatomic molecule), their properties depending upon the nature and ratio of the constituent atoms. The size of the atoms was also estimated, by conjecture or by methods that are not known to us. The estimates vary. In Lalitavistara, a famous biography of the Buddha written mainly in the second century B.C., the estimate is close to the modern estimate of atomic size, of the order of 10–10 m. In ancient Greece, Democritus (Fourth century B.C.) is best known for his atomic hypothesis. The word ‘atom’ means ‘indivisible’ in Greek. According to him, atoms differ from each other physically, in shape, size and other properties and this resulted in the different properties of the substances formed by their combination. The atoms of water were smooth and round and unable to ‘hook’ on to each other, which is why liquid /water flows easily. The atoms of earth were rough and jagged, so they held together to form hard substances. The atoms of fire were thorny which is why it caused painful burns. These fascinating ideas, despite their ingenuity, could not evolve much further, perhaps because they were intuitive conjectures and speculations not tested and modified by quantitative experiments–the hallmark of modern science.Q. In which biography the size of the atoms was estimated close to the modern estimate

Top Courses for Class 11View all

Top Courses for Class 11

Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?
Question Description
Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? for Class 11 2024 is part of Class 11 preparation. The Question and answers have been prepared according to the Class 11 exam syllabus. Information about Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? covers all topics & solutions for Class 11 2024 Exam. Find important definitions, questions, meanings, examples, exercises and tests below for Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?.
Solutions for Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? in English & in Hindi are available as part of our courses for Class 11. Download more important topics, notes, lectures and mock test series for Class 11 Exam by signing up for free.
Here you can find the meaning of Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? defined & explained in the simplest way possible. Besides giving the explanation of Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer?, a detailed solution for Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? has been provided alongside types of Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? theory, EduRev gives you an ample number of questions to practice Two elements X (atomic mass 16) and Y (atomic mass 14) combine to form compounds A, B and C.The ratio of different masses of Y which combines with a fixed mass of X in A, B and C is 1:3:5.If 32 parts by mass of X combines with 84 parts by mass of Y in B, then in C, 16 parts by massof X will combine with___ parts by mass of Y.a)14b)42c)70d)84Correct answer is option 'C'. Can you explain this answer? tests, examples and also practice Class 11 tests.
Explore Courses for Class 11 exam

Top Courses for Class 11

Explore Courses

Suggested Free Tests

Signup for Free!
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days! Learn & Practice with 1000+ FREE Notes, Videos & Tests.
10M+ students study on EduRev
Get App
© EduRev
Education Revolution
Signup to see your scores go up within 7 days!
Access 1000+ FREE Docs, Videos and Tests
Takes less than 10 seconds to signup