What are two merits and dermerits of electoral competition?

Question

Answer

Merits
1 competitions will benefit for the citizens...
2 citizens can choose their leaders who create more economic growth...
3 this leads to the foundation of well developed society ...
4regular electoral competition provide incentives to political parties and leaders .....

demerits

1 It creates a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality.....
2 Different political parties and leaders often level allegations against one another .....
3 parties nd candidates often use dirty tricks...
4 small parties who want to give for the society do not do anything .....
5 misuse of govt money by current govt leaders.....

Answer

Demerits:

1)It creates disunity & factionalism

2)Candidates often use dirty tricks to discredit their opponents & win elections

Merits:

1) It creates competition among parties to serve the people better.

2)People will have lot of options among various leaders.....

Answer

Demerits
•It create a sense of disunity and factionalism in every locality.
•Parties and candidates often use dirty triks to win the election.

Merits
•Regular electoral competition provides incentive to political parties and leaders.
•If any party is motivated only by desires to be in power, even then it will be forced to serve the people
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
hope it may help u,,,

Answer

< b='' />Merits and Demerits of Electoral Competition< />

Merits:

1. Accountability and Representation:
Electoral competition plays a crucial role in fostering accountability and representation within a democratic system. It ensures that political leaders and parties are answerable to the electorate, as they need to win the trust and support of voters to gain or retain power. This accountability helps in preventing the abuse of power and promotes responsive governance. Additionally, electoral competition ensures that a diverse range of political perspectives and interests are represented, giving citizens the opportunity to choose leaders who best reflect their values and priorities.

2. Stimulates Public Participation:
Electoral competition encourages active citizen engagement and enhances the democratic process by promoting political participation. Competing political parties and candidates engage in campaigns, rallies, and debates, which stimulate public interest and discussion on important issues. This involvement of citizens in the electoral process fosters a sense of ownership and empowerment, as they have the ability to shape the direction of their nation through their votes. Moreover, electoral competition provides a platform for citizens to express their opinions, concerns, and aspirations, contributing to a vibrant public discourse and fostering social cohesion.

Demerits:

1. Negative Campaigning and Polarization:
One of the drawbacks of electoral competition is the potential for negative campaigning and polarization. In an attempt to gain an advantage over their opponents, political parties and candidates may resort to mudslinging, character assassination, or the propagation of divisive ideologies. This can lead to a decline in the quality of political discourse and a loss of focus on substantive policy issues. Additionally, intense electoral competition can exacerbate social divisions and deepen polarization among different segments of society, undermining social cohesion and hindering the formation of consensus on important matters.

2. Financial Burden and Corruption:
Competing in elections often requires significant financial resources, which can create an uneven playing field and limit the participation of candidates without access to substantial funding. This financial burden can lead to the influence of money in politics, fostering an environment where candidates rely on wealthy donors or special interest groups to finance their campaigns. This can give rise to corruption and the perception that political decisions are driven by financial interests rather than the welfare of the electorate. Moreover, the high costs associated with electoral competition can divert resources away from other important government priorities, such as healthcare, education, or infrastructure development.

In conclusion, while electoral competition brings several merits such as accountability, representation, and public participation, it also has its demerits, including negative campaigning, polarization, financial burden, and corruption. Striking a balance between healthy competition and ensuring the integrity of the democratic process is crucial in harnessing the potential benefits of electoral competition while mitigating its drawbacks.

Similar Class 9 Doubts

What are the merits of electoral competition

What are the merits to have electoral competition?

What are the merits and demerits of political competition?

What are demerits of political competition ?

What are the merits and demerits of democracy?

Top Courses for Class 9View all

Science Class 9

Social Studies (SST) Class 9

Mathematics (Maths) Class 9

English Class 9

English Grammar Advanced

Top Courses for Class 9

Top Courses for Class 9

Suggested Free Tests

Related Content

Class 9 Study Material

Class 9 Subjects

Competitive Examinations for Class 9

NCERT Books

NCERT Solutions

Reference Books for Class 9

Other Popular Exams

Company